Not One—BUT FOUR COPS—Cowered In Fear as Kids Were Murdered in FL Shooting

in #news6 years ago

Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson resigned this week after a video showed him cowering in fear while there was a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

Now it has been revealed that there were three other officers who were taking cover instead of trying to help. All of the officers who hid were apparently from the Broward County Sheriff’s office and were the first to arrive on the scene.

They apparently waited for reinforcements before doing anything, but according to officers with Coral Springs Police Department, the Broward County officers remained outside and did not immediately follow them to apprehend the suspect.

According to CNN, during a vigil after the tragedy, Coral Springs City Manager Mike Goodrum confronted Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel over the actions of his deputies, saying that it could have cost some of those children their lives. This issue has caused a bit of drama between the two police departments who are now both bitterly criticizing one another’s response to the shooting.

The two departments have since engaged in a childish finger pointing ritual.

Coral Springs Police Chief Tony Pustizzi wrote in an internal memo that “I understand that another agency has given the impression that it had provided the majority of the rescue efforts, and that the tremendous work of the Coral Springs Police and Fire Departments has not been recognized. Please know that this issue will be addressed, and the truth will come out in time.”

Meanwhile, Sheriff Israel hit back saying that Coral Spring Police showed up late and entered the school after the shooter had already escaped.

“We know it was approximately four minutes after the shooter departed the school when the first Coral Springs police officers arrived. We’re investigating every aspect of this,” Israel told the Miami Herald.

The poor response from many of the officers involved has sparked outrage across the country.

Donald Trump even called officer Peterson a “coward” saying that “He trained his whole life. When it came time to get in there and do something, he didn’t have the courage or something happened, but he certainly did a poor job, there’s no question about that. He was there for five minutes, for five minutes that was during the entire shooting. He heard it right at the beginning, so he certainly did a poor job. That’s a case where somebody was outside. They’re trained. They didn’t react properly under pressure or they were a coward.”

In light of this recent scandal, it is important to remember the precedent that was set in the 1981 Warren v. District of Columbia court case. In this case, it was revealed that the police actually have no duty to protect individuals, they just have some vague duty to uphold the law, which allows them to avoid any type of responsibility in situations like this.

According to the decision:

In a 4-3 decision, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial courts’ dismissal of the complaints against the District of Columbia and individual members of the Metropolitan Police Department based on the public duty doctrine ruling that “[t]he duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists”. The Court thus adopted the trial court’s determination that no special relationship existed between the police and appellants, and therefore no specific legal duty existed between the police and the appellants.

While the propaganda of our society portrays agents of the state as heroes, they are nothing more than average men and women, going to work to collect a paycheck, while cutting as many corners as possible in the process, like most of the rest of the world is. Only in their job, cutting corners is a matter of life and death.

(sources for article are hyperlinked at the site below)


http://thefreethoughtproject.com/not-one-four-cops-cowered-fear-kids-murdered-fl-shooting/
Please upvote, follow and resteem if you enjoyed my article and I will return the favor in the comments, even if you happen to disagree with me, I welcome and upvote all good discussion! John Vibes is an author and researcher who organizes a number of large events including the Free Your Mind Conference. He also has a publishing company where he offers a censorship free platform for both fiction and non-fiction writers. John just won a 3-year-long battle with cancer, and will be working to help others through his experience, if you wish to contribute to his medical bills consider subscribing to his podcast to support at https://www.patreon.com/johnvibes
Sort:  

The police have no obligation to protect anyone, they have guns so they can protect themselves, so should teachers. If you trust your teacher with your kids you should trust them with a gun.

We used to train our kids to shoot. It was an average site to see a stack of rifles in the corner of those little red school houses. Both for hunting diner on the way home or protection from wild animals, many young men carried their rifles.

Today, we can't trust kids or teachers with weapons. Only criminals and police.

Teach your children to shoot. Then they know proper fire arm safety, how to handle a weapon, what a gun actually does to something, and most importantly what to do with a found abandoned weapon.

all kids should learn age appropriate gun safety, there are still some school marksmanship programs. It makes no sense to teach them about strangers and drugs and sex but not a little bit of age appropriate gun safety. My friend's father took the Boston T to Sears to buy a rifle when he was 10 and that really was not that long ago.

This is all so tragic, and I hope it's an eye-opener for many who falsely believe law-enforcement will be there to help because clearly that is not the case. We, as individuals, are the only ones capable of saving ourselves, and instead of that being the lesson, we instead have half a nation practically begging for that to be taken away from us. What a mess, and I believe it's intentional... let me grab my tin-foil hat.

Maybe it's just that disarmament is the best way to combat gun violence, but don't worry, nobody's coming for anybody's guns in the good ole US of A. Everybody was whining about Obama coming for their guns and in 8 years nothing happened. Nothing Happened after Columbine, nothing happened after Sandy Hook and nothing happened after Vegas. You may get lucky now after Stoneman and some sensible gun regulation may get passed... but as long as the US government is owned by corporations, I wouldn't hold my breath either.

corporations are the ones protecting our gun rights? thank God

Not really. It takes a 10 minute research spell to understand corporate corruption does little else but undermine democracy, the free market and people's rights. Letting people on the terrorist watch list buy weapons is good for business for example. After mass shootings gun sales go up, so it's good business for example. The cost? Human lives. But hey, what's a life compared to maximizing profits, right?

But you said the gun industry was the ones protecting our civil rights so you seem to be contradicting yourself but in less than 10 minutes I found the gun industry was not even in the top 20 for lobbying
https://www.statista.com/statistics/257364/top-lobbying-industries-in-the-us/

Look who is, the industry whose products are required to carry labels that say "may cause suicidal thoughts or actions" that the shooter was using.

Letting people on the terrorist watch list buy weapons is good for business for example.

Do you imagine such people make up a significant portion of gun buyers? Let me get this right, you want to use secret lists of innocent people to strip them of their basic civil rights without due process? Leftists used to oppose secret lists of innocent Americans until they decided that they liked that idea a lot and the only problem was that not enough liberty was being stripped from innocent, mostly Muslim, citizens and residents.
Lets look at how you get on their secret lists, by saying or writing the wrong things, associating with the wrong people, or going to the wrong mosque, or just having the wrong name right?
On other words you get on the secret list of innocent people target to have their basic liberties stripped without due process by exercising your first amendment rights.
What you want would invalidate the 1st, 2nd, 5th and 14th amendment rights that Americans enjoy and you are saying the corporations who fight that are bad?
But the media industry, who is on that list, fighting against civil rights, is good?

After mass shootings gun sales go up, so it's good business for example.

That's not true, there are mass shootings all the time and no one cares, gun sales go up when the media and politicians choose a mass shooting that involves white people and legal guns and then use that to go on a push for more gun control. Pushes for more gun control spur gun sales, not mass shootings. Nobody bought a gun because of the Mattapan Massacre did they?

The cost? Human lives. But hey, what's a life compared to maximizing profits, right?

Legal guns don't cost lives, the gun industry is not really that profitable. Guns being legal allows people to save their lives.

Loading...

They really shouldve called a few crackheads instead.

For those of us who are aware of the high level of imorrality required to be an order follower stories like this are a tragic but effective tool for shaking & waking our slumbering brothers & sisters. Share it far & wide while being prepaired to push back when a blinded statest comes to the defence of these criminals in uniforms who wouldn't defend these innocent children & teachers. All orderfollowers are evil to the core.

Agree with your comments,"criminals in uniforms"the police should be ashamed of themselves!

Thank you. I do want to be clear when I say "criminals in uniform" I'm also talking about military people as well. It does go much further than that & includes anyone who believrs they can abdicate their personal responcibility for their actions to anyone else for any reason no matter what the order they recieved is. We have to think for our selves & act upon a moral foundation due to the fact that we'll all be called to account for our every thought, word & action.

But the officer feared for his life... Isn't that always their lame ass excuse.

We must protect ourselves independent of any state or group

That's why "coward" is the correct word for them.

there is just no other word that fits so perfectly

Cowardice is a prerequisition.

Hard to believe we continue to place our faith in the fat assed blue line.

They have killed so many innocents, and protected so many guilty people, all while acting as if they are above the law.

I say #FTP

Nice post thank for posting

Wow. Cops were afraid of a drill? Nice red herring.

They got exactly what they wanted:
a gun free zone where only the cops had guns - And People DIED!
"To serve and protect, themselves ".....

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.13
JST 0.029
BTC 57889.17
ETH 3155.19
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.42