You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Julian Assange — Measure of Freedom and Gagging the Truth!
Excuse my question, I am not trying to be difficult here, but how do you reconcile the fact that Mr Assange is " annoyed by 9/11 conspiracy theorists"?
I don't know if wikileaks is legitimate or not. But if it was not a tool for the CIA or Mossad, something like it must be invented.
"Leak" information which is supposed to come out, control the narrative, act as a gatekeeper and use it as a "catch all" for real whistleblowers.
Mr Assange's past and CIA connections are more than scetchy, he is a superhero in the MSM and the most brilliant move was to introduce the transgender agenda with Mr/Mrs Manning. What's your take???
You don't have to ask an excuse @herrleeb, it's a pleasure to have a discussion with you.
If CIA had the idea that all the whistleblowers will go through Wikileaks, then it is their dumbest idea ever. So far, the only whistleblower, connected with Wikileaks and jailed was Bradley (Chelsea) Manning — and (s)he wasn't arrested because someone from Wikileaks has squeaked on him (her), but because he was in charge of the published material, and (s)he new what will be the consequence when (s)he gave the documents to Assange.
Edward Snowden leaked his knowledge on PRIZMA program through Brazilian based journalist Glenn Greenwald, and now is informing public by himself.
Ex-CIA Officer John Kiriakou brought his “unauthorized disclosure” of torture program to ABC News.
William Binney, a former highly placed intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) turned whistleblower and go to the U.S. Defense Department Inspector General to to investigate the NSA for allegedly wasting "millions and millions of dollars" on Trailblazer, a system intended to analyze mass collection of data carried on communications networks such as the Internet. Binney has also been publicly critical of the NSA for spying on U.S. citizens, saying of its expanded surveillance after the September 11, 2001 attacks that “it's better than anything that the KGB, the Stasi, or the Gestapo and SS ever had”.
Here is one comprehensive list of whistleblowers and they certainly did not went to Assange and Wikileaks first.
As for the “annoyed by 9/11 conspiracy theorists”, I would like to see the context of that statement, so we could know what we are talking about.
I am not aware of his CIA connections, you can tell me more about that, but always have in mind that ALL the whistleblowers from the list were members of US intelligence community, and then in certain moment their consciousness kicked in.
I would also like to see which MSM promote Assange as a superhero, because I don't follow MSM. Could you post a link please?
And do not forget — easiest way to compromise an inconvenient witness, is to slap him a label of a “CIA collaboator”. It can really be pure rubbish. The quantity and quality of the published documents speaks in favour of Assange better than any mediator could :)
Could have made a post out of this ;)
All the best
LOL. Yes, there are so many rabbit holes to write posts about it.
Unfortunately I do not have any sources available, that's why I rather ask questions than making accusations. I am interested in so many topics and read so much stuff or watch videos that it becomes impossible for me to keep track.
But to make my point a quick search got me this clip:
Talking about how bad the media is on FOX. LOL. (All the media except FOX, I assume)
Exactly the narrative they want to push in order to "divide and conquer". As most of his "revelations".
Ask yourself: Would he really be on MSM if whatever he has to say was dangerous for the cabal?
I seriously doubt that. It's all theater in my view.
My prime Red Flag is the 9/11 thing. He does not want to talk about stuff which could incriminate certain people.
Personally, I have a very bad feeling about this guy, as I said, if wikileaks did not exist, it would have to be invented.
But again, I simply don't know. But I don't know many things...
That's why I ask questions. And for whatever is presented in the MSM we don't have to ask what are they saying but: Why are we supposed to have this information NOW.
We get to hear only what we are SUPPOSED to hear.
But hey, who really knows? Who can tell what's real or not nowadays?
Maybe I need only a bigger tin foil hat...
Somehow, I have expected to get a link to FOX News in response from you :)
That's not making Assange a superhero. That's using him for their own narrative. The rule is simple: If the true does not bother you, then use it!
No, you are going into the other extreme. The World is too big and complicated for anybody to keep such tight control.
All that you can see now in the alter-media and here on Steemit, is a clear sign of loosing control big time!
Well, let's hope you are right. My perspective is so negative that I truly hope that I am wrong. I'd rather live in your world than mine, seriously. I'm just an old grumpy fart :)
Oh, and btw, I do not watch tv, for years. And specially not FOX. I used to be a bleeding heart liberal all my life...