Ladies and gentlemen? I just caught a typographical error here in my article. There is a paragraph therein that reads: [That is, eventually there will exist a favorable psychiatric terms that will be coined as “type 1 hebephilia” that will deem adults who are sexually attracted to adolescents between 11 and 14 years of age as being normative in their behavior, and there will also exist an adverse diagnosis that will be coined as “type 2 hebephilia” that will deem adults who are sexually attracted to youngsters between 11 and 14 years of age as being individuals that suffer from a paraphilia depending on each case-by-case situation.]

That same paragraph is supposed to read: [That is, eventually there will exist a favorable psychiatric term that will be coined as “type 1 hebephilia” that will deem adults who are sexually attracted to adolescents between 11 and 14 years of age as being normative in their behavior, and there will also exist an adverse diagnosis that will be coined as “type 2 hebephilia” that will deem adults who are sexually attracted to youngsters between 11 and 14 years of age as being individuals that suffer from a paraphilia depending on each case-by-case situation.]

I have bolded the word that I have corrected in that paragraph or rather is to be corrected. I apologize for any confusion this typo may have caused. I'm crossing my fingers that Steemit will soon someday provide an unlimited amount of time for any of us to edit our articles whenever we catch a typo or two in one of them.