You mean attacking media, universities and scientists for doing their work and being ahem... unfriendly to the citizens for which you should be a uniting figure is normal behavior for a democratic-striving leader?
I only know that from autocrats.
Attacking media is fascism? That's interesting...but now you seem to have switched from "fascism" (a position you clearly cannot support) to "autocratic" - like, er, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton?
Attacking media - those that criticize the leader - to undermine their credibility is very typical of autocrats (which yes, includes fascist per definition. Every fascist leader is an autocrat.) Like Trump: "much of the media is FAKE"
Did I mention Hillary and Obama anywhere? Why do you put them up? I don't need straw mans.
So you feel that exercising his First Amendment rights to criticize the statist media is "autocratic"? Hillary and Barry provide classic examples or arrogant autocrats. (You're welcome)
Statist? you mean state-owned? Because I don't think we are in theater now.
You can criticize the media all you wish. There is a lot to criticize. Like using the words Fake News or Alternative Facts when they should use the correct word "Lie"
But you have to show some proof that your accusations are right. If you don't do that, it not criticizing but slander(?) based on lies.
Anyway, the intention of critic from an autocrat not to better the media, but to get an upper hand on them. And that is behaviour Trump shows.
Hillary and Barry provide classic examples or arrogant autocrats
Barry = Obama? So I should Donald Trump Clowny now? ;)
No, Obama and Hillary are not (they may have wanted to be, I don't know) autocrats, at least not for their US, i don't know about their family.
Trump also is (for now) not an autocrat, but he works on that. What was it he said about the judges that smashed his laws?
Well, it surely looks like fascism is coming - as mostly almost - from the leader, in your case the president.
What, exactly, has Trump done that you consider fascist?
Trump’s first 100 days give conservatives a lot to celebrate
You mean attacking media, universities and scientists for doing their work and being ahem... unfriendly to the citizens for which you should be a uniting figure is normal behavior for a democratic-striving leader?
I only know that from autocrats.
Attacking media is fascism? That's interesting...but now you seem to have switched from "fascism" (a position you clearly cannot support) to "autocratic" - like, er, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton?
Attacking media - those that criticize the leader - to undermine their credibility is very typical of autocrats (which yes, includes fascist per definition. Every fascist leader is an autocrat.) Like Trump: "much of the media is FAKE"
Did I mention Hillary and Obama anywhere? Why do you put them up? I don't need straw mans.
So you feel that exercising his First Amendment rights to criticize the statist media is "autocratic"? Hillary and Barry provide classic examples or arrogant autocrats. (You're welcome)
Statist? you mean state-owned? Because I don't think we are in theater now.
You can criticize the media all you wish. There is a lot to criticize. Like using the words Fake News or Alternative Facts when they should use the correct word "Lie"
But you have to show some proof that your accusations are right. If you don't do that, it not criticizing but slander(?) based on lies.
Anyway, the intention of critic from an autocrat not to better the media, but to get an upper hand on them. And that is behaviour Trump shows.
No, Obama and Hillary are not (they may have wanted to be, I don't know) autocrats, at least not for their US, i don't know about their family.
Trump also is (for now) not an autocrat, but he works on that. What was it he said about the judges that smashed his laws?