Suddenly, OTP solutions look quite attractive (stumbled over this one recently); NIST has not exactly my trust when it comes to Lysenkoism.
Reading this article about how governments want to be able to decode encrypted messages, and knowing that the trust relies on the veracity of certain mathematical theorems which make assumptions that only hold true until disproven due to the complexity of the matter obscure to the uninitiated, I would like to bring to the attention of those who know not yet that this exists, the One Time Pad encryption protocol, the only one known to be 100% mathematically safe. I enclosed a link to a simple, transparent Python script that attempts to alleviate a a weakness of OTP, namely, that it is cumbersome and impractical. Especially since, ever after NIST's disastrous report on the collapses of the World Trade Center buildings which prove their loyalty to the government rather than the scientific method, it is not advisable to trust their specifications.
who ?
Or maybe you just failed the Turing Test yourself :)
yeah, that must be that
I apologize, that was rude.
I'll decode the randomness for you.
Reading this article about how governments want to be able to decode encrypted messages, and knowing that the trust relies on the veracity of certain mathematical theorems which make assumptions that only hold true until disproven due to the complexity of the matter obscure to the uninitiated, I would like to bring to the attention of those who know not yet that this exists, the One Time Pad encryption protocol, the only one known to be 100% mathematically safe. I enclosed a link to a simple, transparent Python script that attempts to alleviate a a weakness of OTP, namely, that it is cumbersome and impractical. Especially since, ever after NIST's disastrous report on the collapses of the World Trade Center buildings which prove their loyalty to the government rather than the scientific method, it is not advisable to trust their specifications.