Just when you thought you had the narrative running in your favor...

Who's this? This is Russian Ambassador Kislyak, the same that spoke with Sen. Jeff Sessions. That's him sitting with the Democrats during President Trump's address this week.

Why is this relevant? For the same reason the "Russian Interference" narrative is relevant. It maligns intent and casts guilt by implication.

Ain't psyops fun??

---

More Fun Counter-Narrative

via https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/6894
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05778339 Date: 12/31/2015
From: H [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 12:36 PM
To: '[email protected].
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Kislyak has requested to speak with the Secretary

I spoke w Kislyak. PIs be sure his message

---

So what did THEY speak about in 2010 privately? I know she was the Sec of State at the time, but why should that matter if Senator Sessions shouldn't be speaking with an Ambassador?

---

Interesting tweet --

Who developed this program? Former President Obama. Did he do this to set the stage for a 'Russian interference' narrative back in July so it would be easier to justify a hot war with Russia? I don't know. Just asking the question because narratives are a useful tool for psychological operatives!

Enjoy :D