You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: FORCED VACCINATIONS? The MOST Important Lesson For Humanity Now is to RESPECT & Understand FREE WILL.

in #news7 years ago

@ura-soul @lifeworship

Here I present things for and against;

  • In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that, among children born from 1994 through 2013, vaccination would prevent 322 million illnesses, 21 million hospitalizations, and 732,000 deaths

  • Vaccines that are recommended for children in the United States are fully tested in large numbers of subjects before they are licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). After they are licensed, they are monitored by the CDC and the FDA through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and the Vaccine Safety Datalink. When concerns are identified, the FDA issues news releases and may temporarily or permanently suspend the use of a specific vaccine

  • As vaccine-preventable diseases become less common and parents have little familiarity with the devastating effects of vaccine-preventable diseases, some parents may believe that vaccines are not necessary

  • However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of vaccines: They are neither 100 percent effective nor are they completely risk free. Although provision of this information helps to establish credibility, it must be placed in proper context, particularly for parents who tend to overestimate the risks of vaccines and underestimate the risks from vaccine-preventable diseases

  • Safety concerns include specific side effects (eg, Guillain-Barré syndrome, intussusception, pain) and more general concerns (eg, that too many vaccines overload the immune system, possibly causing autism, autoimmune disease, or increased susceptibility to infection). Concerns about safety are intensified by negative word of mouth and media messages

The conclusion is clear; there are many benefits from vaccination, but there are also risks related to its execution, however there is no scientific or epidemiological evidence to support the non-use of vaccines. Now if you are advocating for your right as a person not to be exposed to a vaccination system, there you are, your risk. Do not confuse a discussion of civil rights with scientific evidence.

Bibliography

https://www-uptodate-com/contents/standard-childhood-vaccines-parental-hesitancy-or refusal?source=machineLearning&search=vaccines&selectedTitle=3~150&sectionRank=1&anchor=H8#H8

Whitney CG, Zhou F, Singleton J, Schuchat A; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Benefits from immunization during the vaccines for children program era - United States, 1994-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Apr 25;63(16):352-5.

Sort:  

He is not confusing a discussion of civil rights with scientific evidence. The issue is two pronged, first, forcing vaccines onto people, second, the suitability or lack thereof of vaccines as medical treatment. The concerns raised about the second argument makes the first argument all the more necessary, and alarming.

For an individual to vaccinate or not, there is no big economic gain or loss either way. Either vaccines are safe and effective, in which case I would accept to take them, OR not, in which case I wouldn't. The decision will neither break my bank account nor make me rich. For the pharmaceutical industry, an untold amount of money is riding on whether millions of us choose to vaccinate or not, especially given how many decades, 100 years or more, they have built up their industry. Given all the influence they have, is it inconceivable they have corrupted the system, and made the scientific evidence supposedly gathered by third parties fit their agenda?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 59239.80
ETH 2662.03
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48