Monsanto Is Paying Farmers To Use Its Controversial Pesticide

in news •  7 months ago

Corporate pesticide maker Monsanto, which has faced several recent lawsuits against its products, is paying farmers to use its controversial weedkiller XtendiMax with VaporGrip, an herbicide based on a chemical known as dicamba, Yahoo News reported.

The incentive to use XtendiMax aims to refund farmers over half the sticker price of the product in 2018 if they spray it on soybeans that Monsanto engineered to resist it, according to company data.

“We believe cash-back incentives for using XtendiMax with VaporGrip Technology better enable growers to use a management system that represents the next level of weed control,” said Ryan Rubischko, Monsanto product manager.

Monsanto faces bans and restrictions of its pesticides in several states due to damaged crops from its product which affected 3.1 million acres in nearly two dozen states, according to Reuters.

Reuters reported:

XtendiMax costs about $11 per acre to buy, and Monsanto is offering an extra $6 per acre in cash back to farmers when they apply it on Xtend soybeans, rather than using another seed-and-chemical combination to control weeds.

The rebate means farmers can receive up to $11.50 per acre in cash back next year when they use XtendiMax along with other approved chemicals, such as one called Intact that aims to prevent drift and costs $2.40 per acre, according to Monsanto.

Monsanto launched a program offering incentives to use multiple herbicides in 2010, according to Reuters.

On Monday of this week, Missouri stated it would ban spraying of XtendiMax in 10 counties after June 1, 2018, and statewide after July 15, 2018, STLPublicRadio reported.

Earlier last month, North Dakota said it planned to prohibit the use of dicamba herbicide formulations – XtendiMax, Engenia, and FeXapan after June 30th, 2018 or after the first bloom (R1 growth phase), whichever comes first, restricting the products’ use.

The North Dakota Department of Agriculture press release also noted that no applications may be made if air temperature of the field at the time exceeds 85 degrees Fahrenheit. The announcement added that applicators must maintain a speed of 12 miles per hour or less when applying products, and they can only apply the chemicals one hour after sunrise to one hour before sunset.

Additionally, last month Monsanto stopped the launch of a new chemical product in its line called NemaStrike designed to be applied to crop seeds to protect them from worms and other bugs after reports indicated that it caused strange rashes on people who came into contact with the chemical.

The EPA last year approved the use of a new version of Monsanto’s weed killer using dicamba on crops during last summer.

That product is also under fire by farmers for causing widespread damage to their crops that are not GMOs designed to resist the chemical. Dicamba was even banned in Arkansas by the Plant Board which Monsanto disputed and sued the group for acting outside its authority in prohibiting its herbicide’s use and failing to consider research Monsanto had submitted to federal regulators.

Dicamba is considered more toxic than glyphosate, but less toxic than 2,4-D, the third most common broadleaf herbicide. (Monsanto is working on crops that are resistant to 2,4-D, as well.) Yet, when used properly, dicamba is considered only mildly toxic to people, pollinators, wildlife, and aquatic organisms. There is no scientific consensus on whether it has cancer-causing properties, though the EPA says “Dicamba is not likely to be a human carcinogen.”

The difference between Roundup and Dicamba is that the latter is more volatile and can easily become airborne and drift from where it was sprayed.

Glyphosate was also listed as a carcinogen on California EPA’s Prop 65 list in July of 201, while a study published in January of 2017 proved that chronic consumption of low levels of Roundup (which contains glyphosate) caused fatty liver disease in animals.

The chemical was also deemed a “probable human carcinogen” by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer in March 2015, and has been recently found in five different brands of orange juice including top brands like Tropicana, Natural Blaze reported.

Monsanto is facing multiple pronged attacks against its dangerous products, finally being exposed for their cancer-causing elements in their chemicals and other health hazards in not one, not two, but three different commodities.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has mandated special training for dicamba users for 2018, requiring farmers to keep records proving they were complying with label instructions.

Written by @an0nkn0wledge for @ActivistPost

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Congratulations @activistpost, this post is the sixth most rewarded post (based on pending payouts) in the last 12 hours written by a User account holder (accounts that hold between 0.1 and 1.0 Mega Vests). The total number of posts by User account holders during this period was 2368 and the total pending payments to posts in this category was $2678.25. To see the full list of highest paid posts across all accounts categories, click here.

If you do not wish to receive these messages in future, please reply stop to this comment.

Watched many documentaries about this evil corporation. I always check the labels and never buy GMO. There are ways to feed the world and not to risk the famine if one seeds producer makes a mistake and miss something in design.


The @OriginalWorks BETA V2 bot has upvoted(0.5%) and checked this post!
Some similarity seems to be present here:
This is an early BETA version. If you cited this source, then ignore this message! Reply if you feel this is an error.

The more we become woke, the more we will become self sufficient. One can grow there own produce and find a local cruelty free butcher. We're doing research people are changing. What a wonderful time to be alive!

Well gee, this is what you get for freaking out and trying to ban the most non-toxic environmentally friendly herbicide on the market... Glyphosate. You made yourselves into Monsanto's little drones, because since it's off-patent, they don't really make a lot of money on it. Ironic, isn't it?

You're not really going to point to the Seralili "study" are you? Really? The one that used rats that develop tumors 80% of the time to prove that Roundup causes tumors? The one where they had to obscure the data with loads of purposeless graphs to hide the one thing it did show... that rats given Roundup in their water survived longer than ones without? Right... of course... because like every other activist out there you couldn't be bothered to read the bloody paper. What exactly is this "research" that you're always pushing people to do?

Geez this sounds very close to third-line forcing which is an illegal trade practice here in Australia.