Very good question. I imagine people from different generations and in different parts of the world would give quite opposing answers. The answers people give will also be powerful indicators of their level of consciousness. Now, on to my (admittedly biased and based on speculation) answer.
I find the scenario of an actual "hot WW3" quite unlikely. We have reached a point where our weapons are simply so destructive that using them without restraint they would destroy all of humanity. This became clear from the day the first nuclear bomb was dropped, and since then technology has only accelerated. Most of what is practiced as "hot" war today is not all-out-carnage with supertechnological arms but either 1). Strategic, guerilla warfare like drone strikes, stealth bombing, etc. or2. tribal warfare like genocides in Africa and other places.
Now, war in its more general sense of conflict will exist forever, but it becomes more "civil/subtle" over centuries of the evolution of consciousness. At least, as an average. There will always be anomalies like serial killers that are caused by energetic aberrations. In general, warfare becomes more mental, psychological, and covert rather than physical, emotional, and overt. We see this occurring with the trend of people inventing terms like "microaggressions" which would have been completely laughable in past decades because it is an idea of harm on a subtle level. (Of course, it can also be the expression of false and toxic victimhood, but I am just using it as an example to show where we are at.) In the medieval ages we were literally stretching people's limbs until they snapped on horrendous torture machines to punish them for crimes.
This is an indicator that humanity as a whole is on the incline when it comes to becoming more sensitive and compassionate, though we have a very long way to go before you can say we're a "peaceful species." Much of the war occurring in the world today is growing pains of this hyperevolutionary process in which our collective intelligence continues to increase while our physical bodies do not change nearly as much. It also gets into speculation about DNA activation, where areas of our genetic code seem to be "coming online" gradually.
TL;DR In my view: huge, physical, global catastrophic war is becoming obsolete as humans accumulate more understanding of reality, even if it doesn't seem that way. The process is gradual and there are many obstacles along the way.
I can agree with you on the fact that we are less barbaric in the ways we conduct war nowadays but, not with how you said that we are getting more compassionate. I mean we, "the general population" are but, those in power, the ones orchestrating the wars aren't. Not even a tiny bit. They have been and will always try to push wars onto us as they bring insane profits for them.
Fascinating. That depends, there are a couple of circumstances that could cause World war 3
The South China Ocean
As should be obvious, a few nations have made covering cases toward the South China Ocean. Vietnam and China have just been to war, so we can't decide that out. On the off chance that war ejects between these countries, it could undoubtedly transform into a world war if America and different countries start advocating diverse countries. Pakistan would bolster China, India would contradict China, and this would be perilous.
2. India-Pakistan clashes
These have happened a few times. In the last one, Pakistan made arrangements to nuke India. That would turn into a destructive war. Pakistan is the main atomic country to not censure utilizing atomic weapons first. This is unsafe. On the off chance that war breaks out again between them, it will either resemble the last ones, or will turn into a world war.
3. India-China fringe clashes
There has been a persistent outskirt strife among China and India and if this heightens to savagery, at that point it could without much of a stretch turn into a world war, with Pakistan advocating China and America behind India (I expect).
4. China-Taiwan clashes
China as of late made dangers in regards to US support of Taiwan. They debilitated a compelling takeover of Taiwan if America sends its naval force to help the island. This would rapidly raise.
5. The breakdown of the EU and NATO
The EU is as of now confronting inner battles. It appears as though these will proceed with issues with Greece, Romania, and Poland, while the western bit spooks the eastern bit. Brexit demonstrates this as well, and Le Pen's battle in France additionally demonstrates this. On the off chance that individuals from the EU leave and furthermore leave NATO, at that point brutality is inescapable.
There are numerous more conditions, however I won't specify them. I don't figure North Korea will cause a world war however, perhaps a short war like Desert Tempest in Iraq, yet not a world war. I don't anyway figure a world war will break out in a couple of years, however its drawing nearer. Perhaps I'll live to battle in it, yet discretion still precedes war, in spite of the fact that this is by all accounts diminishing. Social orders are separating.
In spite of the fact that, I might want you to inquire about Mikhail Gorbachev. Not his association exposed War, but rather his ongoing commitments to governmental issues. He's encouraging collaboration among Russia and the US. In January of 2017, he likewise expressed, "It would appear that the world is planning for war." He's an intriguing man.
I expectation and feel that we are not almost a world war, but rather a great many people never know until its past the point of no return.
Considering the fact that tensions between America and North Korea gets worse every day and the relationship between the Russians and America is dicy at best I'd say we're not to far off from a third world war. All it takes is a misplaced statement from a certain blond haired head of state and the whole world could literally go to shit.
Despite all this, I'd like to believe that the world has come a long way and even though tensions are high, everyone knows the cost of war. With the level of technological advancements that exist in the world right now, a third world war would probably be the war to end all wars with the death toll higher than any war before it.
I don't think anybody is willing to push the "destroy the earth" button just yet so even though the third world war could be close by, all the involved parties know what's at stake and will probably not want to start it.
We are very far from the third world war. Gone are the days of wars. Extending an arm of friendship is the next thing now. We can see Kim Jong Un is already making peace talks. This is good news and I believe there won't be any issue for a long period of time that may warrant Third world war.
Gone are the days of wars? THere has been only a couple of years in human history when there hasn't been any wars worldwide. The past 100 years aren't one of them.
Very good question. I imagine people from different generations and in different parts of the world would give quite opposing answers. The answers people give will also be powerful indicators of their level of consciousness. Now, on to my (admittedly biased and based on speculation) answer.
I find the scenario of an actual "hot WW3" quite unlikely. We have reached a point where our weapons are simply so destructive that using them without restraint they would destroy all of humanity. This became clear from the day the first nuclear bomb was dropped, and since then technology has only accelerated. Most of what is practiced as "hot" war today is not all-out-carnage with supertechnological arms but either 1). Strategic, guerilla warfare like drone strikes, stealth bombing, etc. or 2. tribal warfare like genocides in Africa and other places.
Now, war in its more general sense of conflict will exist forever, but it becomes more "civil/subtle" over centuries of the evolution of consciousness. At least, as an average. There will always be anomalies like serial killers that are caused by energetic aberrations. In general, warfare becomes more mental, psychological, and covert rather than physical, emotional, and overt. We see this occurring with the trend of people inventing terms like "microaggressions" which would have been completely laughable in past decades because it is an idea of harm on a subtle level. (Of course, it can also be the expression of false and toxic victimhood, but I am just using it as an example to show where we are at.) In the medieval ages we were literally stretching people's limbs until they snapped on horrendous torture machines to punish them for crimes.
This is an indicator that humanity as a whole is on the incline when it comes to becoming more sensitive and compassionate, though we have a very long way to go before you can say we're a "peaceful species." Much of the war occurring in the world today is growing pains of this hyperevolutionary process in which our collective intelligence continues to increase while our physical bodies do not change nearly as much. It also gets into speculation about DNA activation, where areas of our genetic code seem to be "coming online" gradually.
TL;DR In my view: huge, physical, global catastrophic war is becoming obsolete as humans accumulate more understanding of reality, even if it doesn't seem that way. The process is gradual and there are many obstacles along the way.
I can agree with you on the fact that we are less barbaric in the ways we conduct war nowadays but, not with how you said that we are getting more compassionate. I mean we, "the general population" are but, those in power, the ones orchestrating the wars aren't. Not even a tiny bit. They have been and will always try to push wars onto us as they bring insane profits for them.
Fascinating. That depends, there are a couple of circumstances that could cause World war 3
The South China Ocean
As should be obvious, a few nations have made covering cases toward the South China Ocean. Vietnam and China have just been to war, so we can't decide that out. On the off chance that war ejects between these countries, it could undoubtedly transform into a world war if America and different countries start advocating diverse countries. Pakistan would bolster China, India would contradict China, and this would be perilous.
2. India-Pakistan clashes
These have happened a few times. In the last one, Pakistan made arrangements to nuke India. That would turn into a destructive war. Pakistan is the main atomic country to not censure utilizing atomic weapons first. This is unsafe. On the off chance that war breaks out again between them, it will either resemble the last ones, or will turn into a world war.
3. India-China fringe clashes
There has been a persistent outskirt strife among China and India and if this heightens to savagery, at that point it could without much of a stretch turn into a world war, with Pakistan advocating China and America behind India (I expect).
4. China-Taiwan clashes
China as of late made dangers in regards to US support of Taiwan. They debilitated a compelling takeover of Taiwan if America sends its naval force to help the island. This would rapidly raise.
5. The breakdown of the EU and NATO
The EU is as of now confronting inner battles. It appears as though these will proceed with issues with Greece, Romania, and Poland, while the western bit spooks the eastern bit. Brexit demonstrates this as well, and Le Pen's battle in France additionally demonstrates this. On the off chance that individuals from the EU leave and furthermore leave NATO, at that point brutality is inescapable.
There are numerous more conditions, however I won't specify them. I don't figure North Korea will cause a world war however, perhaps a short war like Desert Tempest in Iraq, yet not a world war. I don't anyway figure a world war will break out in a couple of years, however its drawing nearer. Perhaps I'll live to battle in it, yet discretion still precedes war, in spite of the fact that this is by all accounts diminishing. Social orders are separating.
In spite of the fact that, I might want you to inquire about Mikhail Gorbachev. Not his association exposed War, but rather his ongoing commitments to governmental issues. He's encouraging collaboration among Russia and the US. In January of 2017, he likewise expressed, "It would appear that the world is planning for war." He's an intriguing man.
I expectation and feel that we are not almost a world war, but rather a great many people never know until its past the point of no return.
Considering the fact that tensions between America and North Korea gets worse every day and the relationship between the Russians and America is dicy at best I'd say we're not to far off from a third world war. All it takes is a misplaced statement from a certain blond haired head of state and the whole world could literally go to shit.
Despite all this, I'd like to believe that the world has come a long way and even though tensions are high, everyone knows the cost of war. With the level of technological advancements that exist in the world right now, a third world war would probably be the war to end all wars with the death toll higher than any war before it.
I don't think anybody is willing to push the "destroy the earth" button just yet so even though the third world war could be close by, all the involved parties know what's at stake and will probably not want to start it.
We are very far from the third world war. Gone are the days of wars. Extending an arm of friendship is the next thing now. We can see Kim Jong Un is already making peace talks. This is good news and I believe there won't be any issue for a long period of time that may warrant Third world war.
Gone are the days of wars? THere has been only a couple of years in human history when there hasn't been any wars worldwide. The past 100 years aren't one of them.