Divide and Conquer – Music Theories

in #music6 years ago

In the scientific study of music, we encounter several distinct yet interconnecting categories of music theory. For my students, I wrote this list on the classroom white board, and assigned them to copy it into their notebooks:

  1. chord theory (a.k.a. “theory of harmony")
  2. rhythm theory
  3. melody theory
  4. polyphony theory (a.k.a. “theory of counterpoint")
  5. orchestration theory
  6. theory of form (and analysis)

The above six studies fall under the overall domain of "music theory." Perhaps you will think of others to add to the list. (?)

In "real" music, however, none of these disciplines exists as a separate entity, since there is a certain measure of overlap and co-dependence between them. But all six fall under the big umbrella of “music theory.”

Let’s demonstrate a few of the overlapping co-dependences:

  1. There can be no polyphony without the individual melodic lines.
  2. In a polyphonic passage, a type of harmony is produced by the interaction of simultaneous melodic lines – our ears deduce a “chord progression” from the combination of bass line, top “melodic” line, and moving inner voices, even though there are no horizontally-conceived chords per se.
  3. Furthermore, all melodies have a built-in, distinctive rhythm. ‘No rhythm, no music,’ as classical and jazz trumpeter Wynton Marsalis once remarked.
  4. Orchestration has to do with the manipulation and combination of the sonic colors of the various musical instruments – say, the violin, flute, trumpet, or balafon – and requires a knowledge of instrument pitch and dynamic ranges, and also of their limitations. Hence, the melodic aspect enters again.
  5. Finally, form refers to musical structure, unfolding over time – music is art expressed through time. A few examples of musical form would include fugue, minuet, sonata, song, and rondo form. These forms are often delineated by changes in harmonic, rhythmic, or melodic structure, as well as orchestral dress and texture.

Study and listen to the example below, which illustrates how four, independent melodic lines can be combined to create what sounds like a progression of harmonies, though there are no actual chords, in the vertical block sense:

Quadruple Subjects - Art of Fugue_0002.png
Tap or Click Link to Listen to this Example: https://dsound.audio/#/@monadnock/quadruple-subjects-of-j-s-bachs-art-of-fugue

Although we acknowledge all the above “theoretical disciplines,” a divide-and-conquer strategy is useful while attempting to master the various facets of this broad suite of disciplines known collectively as "music theory" – harmony, rhythm, melody, counterpoint, orchestration, and form. In future installments, we will focus on them individually, as well as on their mutual co-dependence.

If you appreciated reading through this little exposé, be sure to Follow, Resteem, Share, and Comment. I’ll also answer music-theory related questions posted in the comment box (perhaps in exchange for Upvotes!). Thank you for reading!

IMAGE CREDITS
Fugue excerpt based on J. S. Bach’s Art of Fugue, the realization of the four themes in simultaneous exposition, inspired by Erich Bergel’s modern completion of the unfinished, final fugue of Bach’s masterpiece.

BachBust.jpg

Bust of J.S. Bach, by vxla (downloaded 2017_09_10; mods and commercial use allowed): https://flic.kr/p/7iZuJU

Creative Commons License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode

My Music Theory Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/fundamentalstofugue

Sort:  

Hey @manadnock ... how's it going?
Thanks for the great education about the scientific study of music. I appreciate your time and effort in sharing this information with us. Keep up the good work and I'll visit your blog often.

Your appreciative comments are ... much appreciated! I was just thinking this info might be helpful to someone, somewhere. - monadnock

thanks for this contribution. Very well done. I'll be following.

Thanks for the follow (which is AWESOME!), and for your kind comments.

like that I like to see, can imitate .. ??

Enjoyed your post--especially the bits about independent melodic lines and co-dependences.

I'm endlessly fascinated with independent lines creating a progression of harmonies. There's a life and fluidity with this type of approach, whereas a strict block-chord approach to supporting a melody can be confining. Depends on the form and type of music, of course.

Just this morning, I was reading about orchestration, and specifically about considerations for the foreground, middle ground, and background in a piece. As you mentioned, it's necessary to know the ranges and limitations of the instruments you are writing for. It's impossible to try and study orchestration without considering these overlapping co-dependences, as you put it.

>I'm endlessly fascinated with independent lines creating a progression of harmonies.
This is actually the original way of creating harmonies, called counterpoint. Even today, much of the "rules" one studies in music theory courses - e.g., watching out for parallel octaves, perfect fifths, and doubled leading tones, etc. - these prohibitions describe and are derived from that earlier discipline of the Middle Ages and Renaissance style periods. The crystalized concept of a "chord progression," a series of vertical blocks of notes, came along a few centuries later.

That said, a thorough study of counterpoint - in theory and in practice - should be part and parcel of every musician's harmonic/melodic "bag of tricks."

[Edit:] Very good that you are learning about principles of orchestration, the three 'grounds', etc. What textbooks on orchestration have you been examining? Personally, Samuel Adler is a good place to begin. There is also an excellent YouTube channel on orchestration that you might want to follow. Link: https://www.youtube.com/user/OrchestrationOnline

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.12
JST 0.029
BTC 66216.02
ETH 3547.44
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.01