You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The use of 33 in mainstream media

in #msm6 years ago (edited)

Fascinating and very tempting to get suspicious. However, I am afraid that because of the sheer amount of information available today, one might find evidence for anything.
I could not resist and look into this a bit further and googled some numbers in "News".
I wanted to find a higher occurrence of 33 in news articles. Unfortunately I drew a blank here...

30 About 62,700,000 results (0.38 seconds)
31 About 62,600,000 results (0.44 seconds)
32 About 64,100,000 results (0.37 seconds)
33 About 63,700,000 results (0.34 seconds)
34 About 49,500,000 results (0.35 seconds)
35 About 49,000,000 results (0.32 seconds)
36 About 72,600,000 results (0.34 seconds)
37 About 55,200,000 results (0.32 seconds)
38 About 60,800,000 results (0.35 seconds)
39 About 63,300,000 results (0.36 seconds)
40 About 52,600,000 results (0.31 seconds)

EDIT:
@fakenewsreport made a great point about this. Just the fact that the number itself has no higher occurrence does not mean that it is not used to a higher extend in specific stories. There might very well be a there there :)

Sort:  

It's use in media psyops is astonishingly high. It's most commonly used in fake narratives as a nod and a wink to the illuminated.

Good point. Maybe there is something about it after all. The worldwide pedophilia over decades suggests the same issue. So hard to find out what's true...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 66735.55
ETH 3509.76
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.71