What drives our life to pleasure in displeasure?

If you're not willing to challenge conventional wisdom, stop reading. If you agree, what did Sigmund Freud mean by Beyond the Pleasure Principle?

The father of psychoanalysis wanted to understand the psychological apparatus. Our psyche functions. In his early work, he concludes that pleasure drives the psyche.

The unconscious had deep psychic aspects. A series of buried traumas. The person struggled with those memories.

However, in the conscious, it refers to the recognised and acceptable territory from which one can engage with the outer world and others.

Finally, preconscious elements could become conscious representations or sink into the unconscious.

These three systems created the psychological apparatus, which needed censorship to survive. Without it, repressed memories could enter consciousness unopposed.

Freud considered censorship necessary and permanent. It creates a selective barrier that prevents information from flowing between unconscious and preconscious-conscious processes. Repression begins with blocking unconscious desires and their formations from consciousness.

As mentioned, the pleasure principle supports psychic apparatus operation in this first scenario.

Three systems clashed when voltage entered the gadget. Freud believed tension was an energetic charge that disrupted the psyche and disturbed pleasure after a temporary loss.

The technology responded to this interruption by becoming pleasure-oriented. The goal is to release this energy and regain pleasure. He termed this discharge-guiding force a drive.

Returning to our original question, we can account beyond the pleasure principle.

The first theme to the second theme metapsychological transformation was caused by psychoanalytic clinic discoveries.

Sigmund Freud rethought his thesis in 1920. He admitted his mistake and created a new discussion on this function. In that period, the author distinguished two sorts of drives:

Passion for pleasure, love, and sexuality.
Sadomasochistic death drive, or thanatic, towards the worst place, violent and destructive.
These various traits and manifestations indicate two unethical impulses that are actually the same.

Both engines seek fulfilment. He believes in erotica with aggression or sensuous violence. The two drives aim to satisfy unconscious need.

The ideal ego or superego. Its framework includes self-observation, moral conscience, and ideal development.

Uncritical internalisation of moral, social, and cultural ideals forms the Superego. This internalisation occurs through successive identifications with parental ideals. The individual adopts a trait, quality, or attribute of another and changes himself to match him.

If a subject wants to claim his own destiny, he must find a balance between adapting to reality, responding to the instinctual demands of the id fueled by his archaic heritage, and cultural prescriptions and ideals, which try to impose themselves on the individual based on the Superego.

Because desire is unconscious, it is never erotic or thanatic. He cannot name or approach himself. Nor does it appear straightforward and easy to interpret. Our desire and life drive us.

I

---