Apologies, I ignored the first half or you "not arguing".

I discovered it 2 days ago when I wrote the post. I discovered it on the day that I discovered that you could buy upvotes from acidyo. I shared it on the day that I discovered it. My thinking went along these lines:

"@oppongk replied to my post about edmund.nef. He said that he was against plagiarism and he is a country representative for Ghana. Interesting, he receives strong steemcurator support. Surely a country representative should set an example to the community? Why's he upvoted a picture of a tree? That's odd. Why's he upvoted everything that martins-steem has posted? He must really like trees. After bid-bots too. Something's not right here. Let's look at martin-steem's wallet. Ohhhh, well I guess that makes more sense. @oppongk is a scammer, I wonder how I can articulate this in a way that presents the evidence clearly, leaving enough scope to be wrong. So that if there's a reasonable explanation, that @oppongk can share his side of the story."

That, my political opponent, is how we came to be here.

To be honest, I expected your side of the story to be more interesting. Perhaps involving Covid, a relative or your wife upvoting these posts without your knowledge.

You might believe that you are somehow important to my world. That you are somehow important to the future of Steemit. I don't believe that you are either.

You are simply another fool, in the long line of fools who has achieved a position of relative power, abused that position, and are upset to see all of that hard work come crashing down around you.

I'm sorry that I didn't catch you 3 weeks ago or earlier and then I could have saved us not arguing about the timing of my post.