Thoughts manifest reality - they can be aligned with truth, or not, and still effect reality. A thought does not have to be a belief, but can include belief. Thoughts can be based in knowledge.

(Please don't tell me you also believe it is impossible to know anything.)

I fully realize the principle of polarity and was relating it to actions, which are an expression of energy. Polarity is the expression of the vibratory state of a specific form of energy, not a unified idea. "Hot" is heat energy vibrating at a higher frequency than "cold". "Right" is action expressed at a higher vibration than "wrong". The unified idea is the energy form being considered, the "polar label" is used to describe the vibratory state of that energy. It is necessary to look at this with a whole brain perspective - which is why philosophy and science were one and the same subject.

I assume nothing about you, only respond to what I have seen here. I do not begin to think I know you from a single paragraph, that is impossible. All my points were brought up as supporting evidence to the principles discussed.

..."we can not allow our experiences and understanding of reality get in the way of how we treat others."

I agree, that's because our perceptions are subjective and we must be able to maintain a level of objectivity in their midst. And what better to base your objectivity on than the laws of nature?

"We think the righteous should be esteemed and those who harm should be punished."

Not I. Incorporation of the sacred right of self-defense into an overall understanding of the energetic laws of human actions would have any injustice dealt with in real time. This would increase the rate of human development exponentially. This principle also covers your next point, which I agree with;

Can not an act of destruction create beauty and evolution?

Yes all things are one, but at this point in the expression of consciousness we are individuated, as I used the sign wave / helix to describe.

This where you totally separate action from everything else for no apparent reason;

"An action cannot be considered positive or negative, nor can the results be considered positive or negative as we can never know beyond our limited scope of understanding how that action affected the universe at large."

Every single expression of energy (or combination thereof) including emotions and thoughts, expresses vibratory states, but not actions? I do not know how lighting a huge bonfire effects every single molecule in our reality, but can still describe it's vibratory state as "hot". Not knowing the full ramifications does not negate the possibility of distinction through what is apparent.

Yes we are discussing something that pushes into "philosophy", which is really the attempt to understand unseen principles using what we can see and do know. As these laws correlate through every form of measurable energy and physical matter, how can we isolate action from such?

If you've tested and confirmed that all actions are neutral, we have no will, and there is no possible distinction between positive and negative action please provide any sort of evidence supporting this that is not circumstantial or anecdotal. How does this correlate with our reality in any way?