# Who built the Moon?

in moon •  5 months ago

There are few official 'explanations' how Moon came to existence. Two most common theories thought as truth in schools are either Moon came into existence by fission from Earth's crust through centrifugal force or it came into existence when Earth and Mars sized body (named Theia) had huge impact and blasted material into Earth's orbit and created the Moon. Even those theories are presented as truth, there is no evidence they are the truth. Just the opposite, the Moon have so many anomalies pointing in direction that it might be artificial body. In this article I will present some of evidence supporting that theory...
Source

### I knew a lot information before I started writing this article, but while researching I end up reading whole "Who built the Moon?" book 😛. Along other evidence, in this article I will present the best mathematical 'coincidences' from the book.

In 2005, Christopher Knight & Alan Butler wrote book "Who built the Moon?" where they presented amazing mathematical and geometrical correlations between Earth-Moon-Sun. Those correlations with many other evidence strongly indicate that Moon might be artificial craft. Authors start from fact that from our perspective on Earth, the Sun and the Moon appear to be as equal discs even Moon is tiny compared to the Sun. Odds that happening by chance are really low. Number coincidences start with Moon being smaller then Sun by 400 times, in same time the Moon is 1/400th of the distance between the Earth and the Sun. (Only one of many 400 coincidences) Moon's and Sun's movement is astonishing correlated: the Moon manages precisely to imitate the perceived annual movements of the Sun each month. So, when the Sun is at lowest and weakest point in mid winter, the full Moon is at it's highest and brightest, and in mid summer, when the Sun is at highest and brightest, the Moon is at it's weakest. What are the odds of that? Authors continue to present more number 'coincidences':

The diameter of the Sun is estimated at 1,392,000 km and as the average diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km, so it follows that 109.245 Earths could be placed side by side along the diameter of the Sun. This is not a number that stands out for any reason – at least not immediately. But when we looked at the number of Sun diameters in the Earth’s aphelion (its greatest distance to the Sun) we found that there are 109.267, effectively an identical value because the estimate of the Sun’s diameter is within this tiny margin. How strange. There are the same number of Earth diameters in the Sun’s diameter as there are Sun diameters between the Earth and the Sun. This is a near perfect echo that does not work for any other planet in the solar system.

As we reflected on what we had found, the number play involved in the Earth–Moon–Sun system was nothing less than staggering. We were amused by the charm of this virtual machine especially when using the metric system. We looked at this little equation using kilometers:

(Moon x Earth)/100
= Sun

This means that if we multiply the circumference of the Moon by that of the Earth, the result is 436,669,140 km. If we then divide this figure by 100 we arrive at 436,669 km, which is the circumference of the Sun, correct to 99.9 %. Of course, if we divide the circumference of the Sun by that of the Moon and multiply by 100 we get the polar circumference of the Earth. And, as we have pointed out, if we divide the size of the Sun by the size of the Earth and multiply by 100 we get the size of the Moon.

The Moon has a sidereal rotation period of 655.728 hours, which means it rotates once every 27.322 Earth days. Given that the Moon has an equatorial circumference of 10,920.8 kilometers, this means that the Moon is turning at 400 kilometers per Earth day!

The Earth is rotating at 40,000 kilometers a day and the Moon is turning at a rather precise 100 times less. The Moon always faces the Earth as it travels on its orbit around our planet and yet the average distance is such that the equatorial rotational speed is precisely 1% of an Earth day. These figures are entirely checkable and indisputable. How could all this be accidental?

### Then they continue about Earth–Moon relationship:

The duration of the Moon’s orbit (sidereal – fixed star to fixed star) is 27.322 Earth days (27.396 rotations of the Earth). This number is extraordinarily close to the size relationship of the Moon to the Earth, being 27.31 per cent of the Earth’s size. The Earth currently turns on it's axis 366.259 times for each orbit around the Sun. This number is extraordinarily close to the size relationship of the Earth to the Moon, being 366.175% larger than the Moon.

The Moon turns through an unimpressive sounding 10,920.8 kilometers every 27.3217 days. This converts to 400 km per Earth day – to an accuracy greater than 99.9 per cent. Again this is a factor that only exists in the human period of existence. The number 400 is already central to human appreciation of the Moon because it is 400 times closer to us than the Sun, and it is 400 times smaller. The use of 400 kilometers per current Earth day could be a message that the architect of the Moon knew we would use kilometers and mean solar days. Metric units apart, the Moon is turning at a rate that is almost exactly one per cent of the Earth’s rotation. Or to reverse the factor, the Earth is turning 100 times as fast as the Moon. All curiously round values! To add to the idea that this is a deliberate piece of metric design, the Moon is also travelling on its journey around the Earth at a steady rate of 1 km/s! This speed varies a little as it travels but does not drop below 0.964 km/s and does not exceed 1.076 km/s. And there is something else very special about the kilometers as regards the Moon. To understand it we need to realize that there are 109.2 Earth diameters across the Sun’s diameter. There are also 109.2 Sun diameters between the Earth and the Sun at it's furthest point of orbit. The circumference of the Moon is 109.2 x 100 kilometers. Is that not odd in the extreme?

Issac Asimov(1920-1992), American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University did a lot research about the Moon and in one of his book concluded that Moon shouldn't be where it is:

"We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the Moon by rights ought not to be there. The fact that it is, is one of the strokes of luck almost too good to accept… Small planets, such as Earth, with weak gravitational fields, might well lack satellites... In general then, when a planet does have satellites, those satellites are much smaller than the planet itself. Therefore, even if the Earth has a satellite, there would be every reason to suspect… that at best it would be a tiny world, perhaps 30 miles in diameter. But that is not so. Earth not only has a satellite, but it is a giant satellite, 2160 miles in diameter. How is it then, that tiny Earth has one? Amazing. The Moon, which has no atmosphere and no magnetic field, is basically a freak of nature"

# EVIDENCE SUGGEST THE MOON IS HOLLOW

As part of research about the Moon, authors of the book "Who built the Moon?" also present evidence that suggest Moon is hollow. They present two occasions when Moon was blasted with lunar modules:

In November 1969 the Apollo 12 crew had sent their lunar module crashing into the Moon following their return to the command craft after their lunar landing mission. That lunar module had struck with a force of 1 tonne of TNT causing the shock waves to build up to a peak in 8 minutes and then continue for nearly an hour.

##### Many NASA and other scientist who worked on 'Moon' project at the time, said that evidence suggest the Moon might be hollow:

Maurice Ewing, a co-director of seismic experiment for NASA said this on press conference just after the experiment:

"As for the meaning of it, I rather not make an interpretation right now, but it is as though someone has struck a bell, say, in in the belfry of a church, a single blow and found that the reverberation from it continued for more then 30 minutes"

Dr. Frank Press, scientist from Massachusetts Institute of technology:

"For a rather small impact compared to object hit, to produce effect which lasted fro more then 30 minutes was quite beyond the range of our experience"

Dr. Sean C Solomon, scientist from Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"The Lunar Orbiter experiments had vastly improved knowledge of the Moon’s gravitational field and indicated the frightening possibility that the Moon might be hollow."

#### Even bigger crash was from Apollo 13:

The seismic signals produced by the impact from Apollo 13 were 20-30 times greater and lasted 4 times longer than those resulting from the earlier LM crash. This time, peak intensity occurred after 7 minutes and the reverberations lasted for 3 hours and 20 minutes, travelling to a depth of 25 miles, leading to the conclusion that the Moon has an unusually light core or possibly no core at all. At the time Houston remarked to the Apollo 13 crew: ‘By the way, Aquarius, we see the results now from 12’s seismometer. Looks like your booster just hit the Moon, and it’s rocking a little bit.’ NASA reports how the information from these two artificial moon-quakes led to a reconsideration of theories proposed about the lunar interior. Among the puzzling features, they say, are the rapid build-up to the peak and the prolonged reverberations, because nothing comparable happens when objects strike Earth.

When Chris (co-author of the book) was in Seattle a few years ago he had a meeting with Ken Johnston who had worked for Brown-Root and Northrop, which was a consortium between the Brown-Root Corporation and the Northrop Corporation at the Lunar Receiving Laboratory. The company was one of the prime contractors for NASA at the time of the Apollo missions and Ken was supervisor of the data and photo control department. Ken told Chris that at the time of the impact created by the Apollo 13 launch vehicle the scientists were not only saying that ‘the Moon rang like a bell’, they also described how the whole structure of the Moon ‘wobbled’ in a precise way, ‘almost as though it had gigantic hydraulic damper struts inside it.’

# GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

In 1970, Michail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, two russian scientist from Russian Academy of Sciences wrote article "Is the Moon the creation of alien intelligence?". In the article they represent hypothesis that Moon is an artificial satellite put into orbit by some intelligent beings, supported with many geological evidence:

The outer surface of the Moon is extremely hard and contains minerals like titanium. Moon rocks have been found to contain processed metals, including brass and mica, and the elements uranium 236 and neptunium 237 that had never been found to occur naturally. Uranium 236 is a long-lived radioactive nuclear waste and is found in spent nuclear fuel and reprocessed uranium. Neptunium 237 is radioactive metallic element and by-product of nuclear reactions and production of plutonium. Some lunar rocks have been found to contain 10 times more titanium then titanium rich rocks on Earth.

American scientists have found chromium, titanium and zirconium in lunar rocks. A combination of them all would have enviable resistance to heat and the ability to stand up to means of aggression. These are all metals with refractory, mechanically strong and anti-corrosive properties. If material had to be devised to protect a giant artificial satellite from the unfavorable effects of temperature, cosmic radiation and meteorite bombardment, the experts would probably have hit upon this exactly these refractory metals, because refractory metals are super resist to heat and wear. In that case is it not clear why lunar rock is such a extraordinarily poor heat conductor. Wasn't that what designers of this Super-Sputnik of the Earth were after? From the engineer's point of view, this spaceship of ages long past which we call the Moon is supremely construed.

### Their reference to hollow Moon:

If you are going launch to make artificial Sputnik, then it is advisable to make ti hollow. At the same time it would be naive to imagine anyone capable of such a tremendous space projects would be satisfied simply with some kind of giant empty trunk hurled into near Earth trajectory. It is more likely that what we have here is a very ancient spaceship, the interior of which was filled with fuel for the engines, materials and appliances for repair work, navigation instruments, observation instruments and all manner of machinery...in other words, everything necessary to enable this 'caravelle of the universe' to serve as a Noah's Ark of intelligence, perhaps even as the home of a whole civilization envisaging (thousands or millions of years) existence and long wanderings trough space.

Naturally, the hull of such a spaceship must be super tough in order to stand up to the blows of meteoroids and sharp fluctuation between extreme heat and extreme cold. Probably the shell is a double layered affair - the basis of dark armoring of about 20 miles (32 km) in thickness and outside it some kind of more loosely packed covering (thin layer averring 3 miles (5 km)). In certain areas like craters and what we call 'seas of Moon' the layer is so thin, in some ares non existing.

# MOON CRATERS

One of many unexplained phenomena's about the Moon are the craters. For some reason, no matter how wide in diameter craters are, pretty much all have same universal depth 1.2-2 miles (1.9-3.2 km). The biggest crater is with diameter of 1600 miles (2600 km), but depth of it is only 3.7 miles (6 km). With such a wide diameter, you would think that depth will be deeper for sure, but it seems that there is impregnable layer beneath 2 mile (3 km) protective layer, so no matter how big impact it is, it can't go thru impregnable layer (estimated 20 miles/30 km). One of proofs they are impregnable layer beneath protective layer is they found crates where bottom of crater is convex following curve of the lunar surface.

# STRUCTURES ON THE MOON

Thankfully for many insiders, we have many photos from NASA where they blur out everything they don't want public to see. (I posted only fraction of them). On those photos, it's obvious they blur out large structures, some measured over few miles/km. It's hard to tell what is blur out, but it is obvious they wouldn't blur out something just for fun.

There are many people who worked for NASA and witness manipulating of photos. One of them is Karl Wolfe, Precision Electronic Photographic Engineer. During 60's he was invited to NASA facility because they had technical problems. While working there, one of guys who worked there showed him some photos. In Karl Wolfe words:

"...then he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base which had geometric shapes that were towers. They were spherical buildings, they were very tall towers and things that look more like radar dishes, but they were large structures. If I compare it with what I seen now, because I do have photographs that have artefacts in them that are similar to what I saw, they are massive. Some of structures are half mile in size (800 m), so they are huge structures. Some of the buildings seemed to have very reflective surfaces on them. Couple of structures that I saw reminded me of cooling towers at power generating plants. They had that sort of shape; some of them were very, very straight and tall with flat top. Some of them were round, some of them looked like Quonset Hut, with a dome, kind of like greenhouse. Particular shot that I saw, there were several clustered together over the landscape, a fairly large landscape."

### Karl Wolfe describing his experience:

One of guys who is also exposing NASA is Richard C. Hoagland. He worked as consultant for NASA during 60's. He is most famous for describing how they manipulated photos and showing glass structures that are deleted by various techniques. I recommend watching all 3 parts of this Project Camelot interview, I will post only part where he shows the most examples of glass structures on the Moon:

# ANCIENT MYTHS

There a lot ancient myths saying that Moon is not what we are told. Most of them say that Moon came to the Earth, therefore it is a spaceship. I will mention two myths;

### ZULU LEGEND

The Zulu legend say that Moon was brought here 'hundreds generations ago' by two brothers , Wowane and Mpanku, who the leaders of Chitauri (Anunnaki). They were known as 'Water Brothers' and had scaly skin like fish. Zulu legends say how Wowane and Mpanku stole the Moon in form of an egg from the 'Great Fire Dragon' and emptied out the yolk, until it was hollow. They then 'rolled' the Moon across the sky to the Earth and caused cataclysmic events on this planet. They threaten people, that if they don't obey, they will move the moon and cause great catastrophe again.

### MAYAN AND AZTEC LEGENDS

Few years ago there was serial on Croatian TV "Children of the Sun". Host of the show explored various aspects of the light. Research led him to Central America where he visited Aztec successors. During interview (25:30-38:30 ▶️ video below), one of chief successors told him their legend about the Moon. If you understand spanish, you can watch his explanation from 29:30-35:50) If not, translation is after the video:

13747 years ago (13752 now) we were witnesses of event that change the Earth. Big catastrophe happen. According to our tradition, catastrophe happen when Moon came to Earth for the first time. The moon pushed Earth to the five days making total darkness, big earthquakes and floats in all directions. So we can survive, we went into one cave where we stayed until catastrophe stop. When the Sun show up again, it show up from opposite position. That position was the winter solstice. From that day we returned every year to the place where we witnessed this, so we can see is the Sun in same position.

Because of that, large animals and plants used to exist before. Animals and plants used o grow huge because the Moon wasn't here. But, because of that event 13747 years ago, Earth changed, a lot of people and animals died. We were recovering for many years. We had to find many ways to survive. Caves help us because it filtered water for thousands of years and the water wasn't contaminated. We could drink it and stay alive.

Long time ago, asteroid which we call the Moon now, pass the Earth close by for 3 more times. I n every of those occasions, it leaved trails. We use to talk that is a female warrior which is aiming Earth with arrow and because of it it change Earth's face. We have this stored in our memory. This happen 4 times.

Those things dancers are caring on their feet represent sound of the Moon before it become our satellite. We call it "Coyolxauhqui". Coyol represent the bell, xauhqui represent shiny sand. That sand produce this sound (34:00) which represent sound approaching Earth. That sound was deafening and it put great fear into you.

After that event, the Sun stopped the Moon. The Sun had some kind of electromagnetic charge which calmed the Moon and force it to spin around the Earth. That big electromagnetic charge we call Xiuhcoatl (shiny snake). They say it was the loudest sound human could ever hear. You could feel it for a long time on the Earth.

With this ceremony we remember this catastrophe. We repeat this every year and have same moves in ceremony every time. By this way we hold stability which was lost 13747 years ago.

# CONCLUSION

It is quite obvious that the Moon is not natural body. It's not like only ancient myths are saying something strange about Moon, so you could discard it like strange myth. There is so much evidence suggesting the Moon is put in this place, not by accident, instead deliberately by intelligence beings. What are the chances that Moon will be same size as the Sun viewed from Earth? Very very little. What are the chances that the Moon will manage precisely to imitate the perceived annual movements of the Sun each month? Also very very little. When the Sun is at lowest and weakest point, the Moon is exactly opposite every time. Odds for that? Close to zero.

Why we can see only one side of the Moon? That is really strange. It's like someone put it such a precise orbit, so viewed from Earth, you will never see the other side. Reasons are obvious why is that, there is something on other side...

Do I have to mention all the mathematical 'coincidences' mentioned in "Who built the Moon" book? What are the odds all those numbers coming together exactly? Let be honest..it's not coincidence obviously!

Moon's quakes clearly show that the Moon is hollow. If it wasn't hollow, it would have quakes pretty similar to earthquakes. As we know from our experience, if you hit hollow wall or any object it can ring a little bit, just the opposite from 'full' objects.

Geological evidence show that materials the Moon is made of do not origin naturally. So if materials don't exist naturally, someone had to bring them up. Not only that, what are the odds Moon's out layer is made of exact perfect materials you would put on artificial body?

Craters are showing odd patterns. Some of craters with hundreds of miles/kilometers in diameter, have only few miles/kilometers in depth. Also some crater bottom's don't have shape of crater, instead the bottom of crater is convex following curve of the lunar surface. That clearly show that there are two different layers of the Moon. Protective with materials just for that and hard inner layer under it.

NASA deleting and censoring stuff is well known thing. I for fun watched live feed from ISS for only 5 minutes. In the moment some light came from space, suddenly live feed was cut off...wow how strange for NASA...and they only want truth 😜. From the censoring of video feed, bluring photos, laying about existence of UFO's (I saw one by close distance) to endless inside witnesses exposing them. Millions had seen some kind of UFO and the NASA don't have any clue about it...😀 😀 😀 Same for the Moon...They have info about structures on the Moon, but intentionally don't want to say it publicly. Luckily for us, we have people like Karl Wolfe, Richard C. Hoagland and many other who are ready to expose NASA lies.

# THE MOON IS MUCH MORE...

I intentionally didn't want to mention my whole theory about the Moon. I don't think the Moon is just base for aliens or whoever. I think it is much more. My opinion this that moon is some kind of 'machine' which is holding humanity and whole existence on Earth is low frequency by beaming certain frequency which suppress our DNA. It is long story for one paragraph, so I will describe it in one of following articles...

Sort Order:

Thank you for this wonderful write-up on the moon debate. I have always wondered if it was more than just a simple dusty space rock or not. In any case it is very shiny and I hope humans can visit there soon.

·

It quite obvious it's not just some rock. I don't know about visitations because the Moon is full with activity, especially on side we can't see.

God. It's a light in the sky.

next.

·

Very good argument! Keep blowing my mind...

·
·

if you really believe this is a 'space rocket' taking off 'from the surface of the moon' then you have no mind left to blow i'm afraid. watch the video on youtube for even more obvious fakery. it's a light in the sky.

·
·
·

I don't know is this video filmed in studio or Moon. What evidence you have that is filmed in studio?

What is light in the sky? The Moon?

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by cmoljoe from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

I agree it is not natural. As explained in your great write up. Funny it is also the title of the latest Noel Gallagher album ""Who Built The Moon".

·

I noticed the name of album when I research the Moon. Most likely dude know something, but it is hard to talk about this stuff openly...

·
·

Yeah, I have heard Noel Gallagher say that he chose the title from the book you mentioned. He has read it.

·
·
·

Then, I assume this is his way to spread the word without openly talking about it.

You got a 35.83% upvote from @emperorofnaps courtesy of @cmoljoe!

Want to promote your posts too? Send 0.05+ SBD or STEEM to @emperorofnaps to receive a share of a full upvote every 2.4 hours...Then go relax and take a nap!

This was the best collection of data I've ever seen. Thank you for the Aztec Mythology!

·

Considering your name, it is funny you found my article 😁

Thank you for a very comprehensive article, I have not read the book but I was aware of some of the number correlations between earth/moon/sun and some of the legends of the moon being brought here. However I personally would question what an alien race advanced enough to reach us from even the nearest star would want with this planet.

The near side also basically has the yin-yang symbol on it. And I wish you had provided lots of sources ;)