This is a really interesting take. I always assumed that the principal argument against GMOs had more to do with them being somehow less healthy to eat, as opposed to how genetically modifying food can help a company to corner the market.

Out of curiosity, any ideas as to why the discussion isn't more commonly framed through the lens you use here?

You changed my mind on this topic, and I thank you for that. I hope you feel good that you did that for a person today :)