I've used Wildspark past 3 days, spent 2 AMP and only got 0.1 AMP. Its like Belacam where I spent Bela to vote so the voted got Bela. I don't know whether it got any interest like holding Steem. Rightnow, Steem and LBRY give more via sharing content. We'll just wait and see how Wildspark can perform, still too early to judge.
I think content creators are going to make the most money on the platform(especially at the begining). The team has MILLIONS of dollars. To the disbelief of all the haters they haven't spent ANY of the money(the addresses are there for all to see). They clearly state in there interview that they plan on using some of this money in the near future to bring in BIG USERS from other platforms such as youtube. Things could get very interesting .
Well more people have to watch those videos and amplify it after you I think.
So it's kind of like a pricing game, people have to anticipate the most trending videos and amplify those before others do.
It's just like curation on Steemit, except on Steemit curation is collectivized (your create Steem shared with other's value), on Wildspark it's out of individual pockets.
So in this sense Wildspark provides a better pricing mechanism for popular videos.