As Predicted, Violence Blasts the US After Trump’s Election - and This Is Just the Beginning
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://dollarvigilante.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/trumpriots-676x374.jpg)
The violent backlash has started, just as we predicted. The US is increasingly convulsed by anti-Trump public demos and riots. We’re supposed to believe it’s simply the result of a very close election and “passionate” voters. Hell, no.
We analyze trends, and we’ve already predicted a Trump presidency is going to be the subject of plenty of manipulations. There are very powerful people who intend to use his election to make things worse. No doubt the “crisis actors” are already out in force.
Like the military and economic trends we’ve spent the past two years analyzing and predicting, the current violence is part of a larger, targeted disintegration of the US and Western society in general. Today’s events are supposed to culminate in tomorrow’s global government.
But first there’s a lot of tearing down to do.
If you know what’s going on, it’s hard to keep a straight face. We’re supposed to believe that this woman - whose most recent catastrophe was engineering the genocidal downfall of an entire civilization, Libya, to line her own pockets, is worth a violent protest.
Of course given the violence and warmongering that surrounds her like a bloody blanket, maybe the current protests are actually quite fitting.
But nonetheless, it’s ludicrous.
Following newsfeeds (safely outside the empire) I’ve seen hundreds of thousands of people in cities across the US chanting, “Not my President!”
For an instant, I made the mistake of believing that sanity had settled on a portion of the electorate! I was so happy ...Yes! “He’s not our President! We own ourselves! Government is an immoral, criminal belief system!”
Was the individualist revolution happening? … Nope.
These protestors were just upset because they didn’t get the slave master they wanted. Many Americans were hoping for a female master instead.
But let’s roll it back a bit. The flames of division really started getting stoked toward the end of election night when black CNN political commentator and avowed communist Van Jones, began tearing up and started calling Trump’s win both a nightmare and a “whitelash”.
In the classic divide-and-conquer style, Jones helped to make this into a racial issue by saying this Trump’ victory was a “whitelash” against our black president and a changing country.
Fitting statements considering Jones is an employee of the divisive “communist news network.”
Of course it wouldn’t be a proper escalation of racial tension without Reverend Al Sharpton slinging some mud as well.
Outside NBC studios in NYC, Sharpton was asked what he thought about the election result, to which he replied, “He [Donald Trump] can’t deliver on half of what he says he will.” He went on to say “Saddle up Donald!” ... before asserting that Trump is going to have the “fight of his life”.
That’s one talent Sharpton has got ... sniffing incipient violence. Or maybe he’d just been tipped off to the riots and protests that soon started raging across the US in over 12 different major cities, including Manhattan, Chicago, Kansas City, Boston, Philadelphia, St. Paul, Des Moines, Dallas, Oakland, Los Angeles, Seattle - and whole regions such as New England.
As a result, Donald Trump is meeting with O’bomber at the White House to discuss how they can handle the outbursts which are going on throughout the nation, together.
Most Americans prior to this election would tell you (in typical misguided fashion) how wonderful and lucky they are to live in a “democracy.” But now that many haven’t gotten their way, they’re shattering storefront windows and burning American flags in “black lives matter” fashion.
Millennial Bernie Sanders fans are certainly starting to Feel the Bern. Not only did their favored socialist candidate lose the rigged American primary, but their party’s winning candidate Killary, managed to lose the general election despite having every possible advantage.
The mainstream media turned her criminality into “caring” and her psychopathic greed into “goodness.” Still it wasn’t enough. She lost the general election despite spending around double what Trump spent on his campaign, much of it donated by totalitarian, corrupt regimes in the Middle East who stand against everything that Hillary’s supporters stand for.
She couldn’t even win after the governor of Virginia released 60,000 convicts (and suggested they vote Democratic). Hillary won that state by just about 60,000 votes, by the way.
More Hillarity: She had her “spirit cooking” campaign chairman Podesta give a short concession speech on her behalf late in the evening. No doubt this was because she’d already started in on her reported non-stop (all night) crying jag - and was apparently drunk to boot.
Obviously Hillary’s biggest sorrow was that the US has been deprived of her economically dysfunctional leadership. And of course her loss is not her own responsibility!
Supposedly still addled, she weepingly called a friend in the wee hours of the morning, sputtering that The Defeat was James Comey’s fault - and that Obama himself was also responsible because he hadn’t shut Comey down soon enough.
Hillary’s certainty of her own indispensability is unfortunately shared, at that moment, by tens of millions of “supporters.” It only takes a tiny push to herd these small-brained signifiers in any violent direction one wishes and as suggested above, there’s no doubt this is being done.
As I write, thousands of Bostonians are walking through downtown chanting "Trump is a racist" and carrying signs that say "Impeach Trump" and "Abolish The Electoral College."
I wish they were pacing back and forth with signs that said “Abolish the Federal Reserve” or “End the Federal Government” One can only wish (peaceably of course).
Even if voting weren’t evil, what woman in their right mind would want the first female president to be a known and proven criminal who already had blood on her hands prior to the election?
We’re supposed to ignore such logical inconsistencies. All this unrest is exactly what the elites - who are the purveyors of division - want. This is just the beginning of the ongoing incitements and violence, worldwide, that we’ve spent years predicting.
On broadway in Oakland militarized police have armored vehicles on the streets. This is all part of an effort to stir up and incite violence to distract people from things like the war on cash which is raging on in India. To see more about this, view our last article.
All things considered, we’re witnessing a pretty bleak time in history where the media who are supposed to be on the side of the people, are totally infiltrated. The media is so controlled in fact that CNN is getting their own cameramen to act as a Hillary supporters. Check out this clip here where Don Lemon admits to knowing the interviewee who was supposed to be a “random guy off the street”.
None of this is ending. Much is just beginning. And surely, you’ll want to keep your and your family’s assets protected via investments both inside and outside the financial system. Subscribe to the TDV newsletter to receive the most up-to-date and pressing political and financial information on the internet.
When you become a member you will receive exclusive access to individual and specific stock and options picks included in our top yielding portfolio which is up around 200% so far in the last year.
We give all our picks to subscribers only. Including a recent ingenious pick by TDV’s Senior Analyst, Ed Bugos, which made subscribers money on Deutsche Bank whether it collapsed or if it was bailed out.
One subscriber commented on the win today in TDV’s private subscriber’s only Facebook Group:
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/https://dollarvigilante.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/tdvscreenshot.jpg)
But don’t stop with a subscription. This February, join us in Acapulco, Mexico, for Anarchapulco and the TDV Internationalization and Investment Summit as well. You will have a chance to listen to and mingle with the most brilliant minds in the business. It might be a good time to get to Mexico, anyway, before they get that wall up.
We predicted that Trump would win (and not for reasons that anyone else did) and that this fall would be the start of chaos plus we've earned our subscribers a lot of money over the last year in bitcoin, gold, silver and mining stocks.
Many have even used our worldwide group of dollar vigilantes, which you can see here at the Vigilante Expat Network, to get out before it’s too late.
Expect wild times ahead… but if you are prepared, they can also be enjoyable and profitable times. For those who aren’t aware of what is going on, they are going to unfortunately get hurt in this ongoing chaos.
![](https://img1.steemit.com/0x0/https://www.dollarvigilante.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Jeff-Berwick-The-Dollar-Vigilante-Steemit-Bio-1024x221.jpg)
Apparently democracy is great when your team win
I'm not at all hopeful that the Trump phenomena will noticeably get people to question the idea of a democracy, though. Democracy, just like the government in general, has been so successfully marketed to people that they so strongly believe in the concept that whenever it fails to deliver, it's never seen as a flaw in the concept, it's always something external that is keeping it from functioning properly. It just needs some fine tuning and, man, we're off to the races and utopia can finally be achieved. Rinse and repeat.
I think it's a terrible shame that this is happening. I'm also surprised since the popular vote was very close.
While Hillary did beat Trump by a slight margin with the popular vote, I would expect violence and riots only if she had beat him by a very large margin.
In this particular election, however, a lot of people were pretty quick to admit that they voted for a candidate not because they liked the candidate so much, but that they thought it was the best option of the two. The lesser of two evils, shall we say.
I think that these riots are going directly against what the leaders of our country want. President Obama and Hillary Clinton have both said that they want a smooth transition, and even Trump seems like he's prepared to work together with the Dems to tackle some of the countrys current serious problems.
I wish people would simply stop being so selfish and just start getting along and working together. Protesting and rioting is not going to change anything for the better. Trump is president-elect, and on January 20th he will be sworn in as our 45th president, no matter how many people protest.
I stay stop all the BS and let's start working together.
They don't have the attention span, it is already settling down.
Those riots where also present when George Bush junior won. This time they use the racial stupid argument to look for a change in the result. What do we need to do: to vote until they do not get the result they want ? So far, they do that in Europe, they force the people to vote until they do not get the answer: yes, we want to join the EU. If they vote against like in Brexit, there are riots asking to vote again and again and again until they get the result they want. Once, the elite got the right result no more vote is required. Democracy is close to be dead.
We are surronded by kids who do not know how to get a job, a life, an income
Incredibly well stated. My podcast guest this week said some of the same things in our pre-recorded interview (posting tomorrow night). I'm going to link to this article of yours as a supporting argument, thanks for the insights.
Best, Guy
I said right after the election result that I hope no one gets seriously injured the upcoming riots that are guaranteed to occur, since the left is always going to throw around their legos whenever things don't go the way they were supposed to.
While TDV's posts are utter bullshit at the best of times, maybe try to remember that conservatives were loading up on ammunition because Trump kept telling them the vote was rigged.
exactly.
The Republicans have been throwing around their legos for 8 years.
So much ridiculousness in your post, so I'll just be nitpicky here....
Cities like Manhattan? You mean New York City. Manhattan is a part (a borough to be exact) of NYCity. And "whole regions such as New England"? Do your homework. New England is a broad term that covers 6 states. There are actually large cities in New England like Boston, Hartford, Portland, Providence.
Anyway, these protests would have been happening if Clinton had won too, except those dopes would have brought their guns.
Unfortunately sir @dollarvigilante is fulfilling all his predictions, this and the markets down.
Interesting post happiness for another great post
Actually, the markets are up and doing remarkably well. Even Warren Buffet, who supported Hillary, said he's "100% optimistic" now. The TPP was even shot down as an added bonus. Best to actually check before repeating other people's bullshit. TDV's just nonsensical doom porn.
I appreciate your words, recommendations and your valuable time in answering my comment. thank you very much
I may be a fool for saying thing but i was reading through the comments and saw everyone ranting and raving about people being republicans and democrats. Why would anyone in their right minds want to put a title on themselves and wear that around? You people are crazy!!! Oh and by the way, why in sam hell would you need governors and tutors overlord over you? Trump, Billary, or mickey mouse, all the same in my book.....You all need someone to LORD over you because you can't run your own lives yourselves and you need guidance. Think about it and maybe it'll make sense. Oh and by the way, in my opinion, if you keep your nose off of the news for any length of time, you will damn near instantly become smarter, but just to keep on what's happening around the globe just look at the headlines once in awhile so you know what's going on. Riots or not, if it doesn't directly affect you, then what business do you have sticking your nose in it and getting all upset over it. People are crazy, that's all i have to say.
I was curious as to what country you live in. I don't know of any country that does not have politicians, police, governors, senators, parliament, or some other form of "lords."
It also doesn't matter if people can run their own lives or not. Politicians and people in power positions have always existed and always will. Whether or not people need them is up to the individual as far as I'm concerned.
Most people don't really know what people in power actually do, so they don't know whether or not they need them or not.
If you are advocating for anarchy, well, that's a nice idea, but in this violent world it would never work anywhere.
I actually live in America, as one of the people. I know that they have police and politicians and everything set up, saying that i know why people are out in the streets protesting. It's because the free train is going to end and the people who are doing the rioting know it. I've come to the conclusion that there is a happy medium for me to participate in the "system". I know that i can either use my person or person's or stay private. I know where i stand. I also know that if i ask something from someone that they can have a say in whatever i do. I ask nothing so i expect nothing. Here's the problem.... people have become so dependant on relying on the "government" to create the world that they live in that they might have to do it themselves and they don't even know where to start. And i'm wondering how saying any of this would lead to anarchy? I know this though.
Let me say this....I talked to a monk one day earlier this summer at a catholic church, was telling him what i thought and his answer to me was this. If the people out there in the world knew that if they knew that they didn't have to do any of what they are doing and knew it was a hogwash, it would be over. If the people knew that they could stop chasing money and keeping up with the Jone's and chasing the "American Dream" then the system would collapse and the truth would come out that it was all B.S. and they didn't have to do it. One way or another the way we are doing it is going to change wether forcefully or not, and nothing i will ever do will have any impact on that, but rather this dream everyone is chasing is unsustainable so it will eventually take care of itself.
I ask this question to you and all that see this. What will you do? There is a new world coming and will you embrace it or do you still like the old analog world? I know most don't know what i'm referring to but wether you know it or not they welcomed in a new online world, where you have a username. This username is who you are in the new world and that will create a seperation between who you are online and when you log off. There is no seperation out here in the analog world, so that's what the powers that be are trying to accomplish. How can i be a @gmail account name? There will be a clear seperation.
This isn't a cut and dry discussion at all, no straight answers to any of this, and everybody's views are different. I've made a total change from when i was slaving for money and when i thought that more stuff would make me happy, that i was chasing the wrong things that didn't really make me happy after all. Their looking for dreamers, will you be someone who can ask the question what can i do for you and what's not in it for me? We're entering a brave new world and most won't know what to do.
In a way we are a lot alike.
I learned a long time ago as well that working for someone else to build their business while I barely got by was certainly not the way I wanted to live my life.
I also came to the realization some 10 years ago now that most people were slaving away at 2 or even 3 jobs at a time so they could acquire more material things. For instance, they could work at one job for 40 hours a week and support themselves and their family just fine, but they had to pick up that second job and work another 20-30 hours per week so they could keep up with their neighbors and acquire more stuff. They foolishly believe that "stuff" is going to bring them happiness.
Meanwhile, they hardly see their family, friends, and loved ones because they are so obsessed with getting more material things and also more status; a bigger house, a better car, a job promotion, etc.
After a while when all of this new stuff doesn't make them happy, they finally realize that the real key to happiness is the simple things in life, watching your child get their first goal or hit, celebrating your marriage anniversary, etc. Usually, by this time it's too late.
People that have realized this early in their life are blessed. However, I also believe that the government doesn't want people to come to this realization. The government wants you to believe that you absolutely NEED them to live, when in fact, we really don't need them at to govern our lives. The government is actually supposed to be serving us and carrying out our will. I believe that in modern society it is the complete opposite. They wish to divide us so they can control us. Sadly, they are achieving this in a very swift and efficient manner.
I'm quite sure that the founding fathers of the United States would be completely ashamed if they were alive to see what's going on this country today. I'm sure that this is not what they intended when they crafted the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Good read! It's been interesting reading about the US election from Australia.
Without being a voter I wouldn't have much influence from here... but we had a similar situation happen with our electorates a few years ago, Julia Gillard (Labor) and Tony Abbott (Liberal). We have a two party system like the states, parties being liberal and labor.
Julia Gillard was voted in and she became Australia's first prime minister. She got there because people wanted to see a woman in parliament house, not because of any policies or laws or proposed bills of any sort. Tony Abbott on the other hand had very strong, christian values and based his views on what the bible taught. As it turned out, neither was a good choice...
Julia Gillard got the country into HUGE debt with the vet-fee HELP system, which is up to $90k in loans for higher education, and no repayments until you earn over $50k annually. Of course with no means testing we ended up billions of dollars in debt. Once she was voted out by a landslide the following election, and Abbott was sworn into power, everything Abbott did was against the liberal crowds here, however financially speaking he started making improvements.
We didn't really have a good choice either way... it reminded me of the south park mascot episode, having to vote between a giant douche or a turd sandwich.
I wonder why we aren't allowed to vote for a third option if no one is satisfied enough with the candidates... Do you think that if people could vote for A) Trump, B) Clinton, or C) bring in a third candidate... do you really think people would have still voted for either major candidate?
I mean it's just all a bit silly. How is it that these kinds of people have any sort of influence at all? Why is someone who has been a businessman be put into power, and why should someones genitals put them in a position of power either? It's just all silly