MOL Moore Chain Academy - Why are the top tycoons in the world not optimistic about Bitcoin?

MOL Moore Chain Academy: From Buffett's shareholder meeting to public events attended by various rich people, people from time to time will ask people what they think about Bitcoin. Catch Gates asked Gates, caught Ma Yun and asked Ma Yun, and then every time he was fermented into big news. Up to now, at least 90 of the top 100 in the world's rich list have publicly expressed their views on Bitcoin. But these people are "not waiting to see" bitcoin without exception, and it seems that the more the top ranking, the more "not waiting". The least important thing to see in Bitcoin is Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, the two who have long dominated the top two Forbes rich list.

Bill Gates once said, "Bitcoin is purely speculative, who buys who is stupid." Even he said that if he can, he will short the bitcoin. The "stock god" Buffett's attitude toward Bitcoin is "more extreme". As soon as the bitcoin price just broke through $100, Buffett publicly stated that "bitcoin is a rat poison, and must stay away from bitcoin." Even later, bitcoin prices soared to nearly $20,000, and Barr’s father never wavered.

At the Berkshire Hathaway shareholders meeting in May 2018, a reporter from FOX asked Buffett that the price of bitcoin had risen from $100 to more than 9,000 dollars at that time. His view on "bitcoin is a rat poison" Is it a change? Buffett replied, "The current bitcoin should be the square of the rat drug."

First of all, Buffett's answer is no problem, because the square of 100 is indeed equal to 10,000. But as the world's top investment guru, why is Buffett so "not to be seen" for Bitcoin.

In fact, our top domestic richest people have no good attitude towards Bitcoin. Whether it is the Jack Ma of Repentance Ali or Ma Huateng of the ordinary family, they have publicly stated that they are "not interested in Bitcoin."

As we all know, today's Bitcoin is no longer an early "technical circle game", it has attracted more and more people to participate in it, there are technical geeks, there are financial elites, there are commercial big coffee, there are ordinary aunts. Even after the US Congress hearings on serious political issues were broadcast live, some people would hold a sign behind them and enter the picture, saying "Buy Bitcoin."

These people have different identities, and in the case of "impossible collusion", "bitcoin is constantly being promoted" in various occasions. Intuitively, a thing that attracts so many different levels, different industries, and different identities to "force" is obviously not something "bad things." But why are the top tycoons “not waiting to see” bitcoin? Today, the founder of the Moore Chain MOL, Qian Haitao, will discuss the "secret" behind this.

Bitcoin code is very "simplistic" (not defamatory), but the gameplay is very colorful. Just like on social networks, if some forked coins are provoked by bitcoin, then basically there are 1000 kinds of black paragraphs and spoofs. Every day, there can be no heavy samples. It seems that there is a kind of decentralization. Horror, is there?

Many people may not know what this "decentralization" means. Just think about it, a thing that even "the founders are running", but once you "black" it is likely to attract a variety of "contempting eyes", even a group of people's "spoken words", And there are a lot of people in this group who still have big faces and faces. What kind of "magic power" can dominate so many people to defend it.

Today, I will tell you the answer. This kind of "magic power" is a straightforward statement, which is a kind of "掀 table" attribute, and Bitcoin has always retained this attribute.

Human society (because of the ghosts) has always been difficult to form effective consensus and action, and Bitcoin, as a social experiment, has made a major breakthrough in solving this problem. At two levels: at the code level, it enables participants to consistently book accounts; at the level of social operations, it can form socially concerted actions.

At Buffett and Gates's "meal table", if 51% of the people at the dinner table take concerted action, they can smash the table and then divide the wealth of others (choose not to slap the table); otherwise, if the table is not The wealth of these people on the table will be divided by others. Then, at this table, if you can rank on the rich list, you will not participate in the table (because the loss is big). Therefore, the results of the entire meal run, Buffett and Bill Gates must be more and more rich, which is in fact in line with the reality of our society.

But the discerning person should be able to see that on this table, as long as they are not the top ranked people, they have the original motivation to smash the table. When Bitcoin came out, it was mainly the technical geeks who were playing at the beginning, and then quickly became speculative. The key reason is here. Because everyone found out that it is more than just a technical game, but also comes with the "掀 table" attribute.

For the top tycoons, they won’t have much interest in betting on things with this attribute, but some sub-rich or sub-rich people may be involved because they are doing it for them. After ambushing, it seems that the table is not bad, and the two bets are precisely what these people are best at. It should be said that this is actually more rational, so the table is peaceful, no one is talking about the table, but someone under the table secretly bets and fired it.

This explains why people like Ma Yun and Ma Huateng are “not waiting to see” bitcoin, while Xu Xiaoping, Cai Wensheng, Xue Manzi, Chen Weixing and others directly rushed up. In fact, looking at the big money in the entire currency circle, including the “three o'clock community”, which is known as the accumulated trillions of worth, is probably at such a level of “more motivation for the table”, because it seems that they are not doing this, they Those positions that are expected to be top-notch are really unmovable, and this has nothing to do with technology. The first is the need for such a "squatting table", and then what kind of thing with this attribute will attract them.

Of course, as everyone knows, people with such needs, more people at lower levels (such as me), this is more sadly reminded, I am not willing to mention, but many have This "lower level person" who needs the table, often because of this demand, has been led astray and harvested many times.

In Buffett’s statement, it actually includes this meaning, that is, “If you see someone else making a fortune and then killing it, you want to make a fortune against something that has no value. The result is often not sorrowful.”

Bitcoin has been unswervingly taking the “decentralization” route and putting “decentralization” first, because this decentralized feature continues to convey the feeling of the table, that is Core competitiveness. I don’t know what to say, but the feeling itself is very important. So we can see that there is no unified command, but everyone has worked hard in the same direction, and has worked out such an effect. So the secondary and secondary rich have begun to bet, and some of them are more emotional. Actively jumped out and shouted.

For Buffett, he himself has always admitted that although he is working hard to get rich in a relatively fair environment, many people can only live a poor life in the third world because they do not have the same growth environment as him. So he also made a will and will donate 99% of the property behind him.

On the moral level, Buffett is of course in a relatively high position, and has always been an icon of many of us and an example of learning. He hopes that the whole society should work hard in the direction of "creating value". Individuals will change their destiny by their own efforts. The three views are very positive.

But the operation of society often does not shift with the subjective will of the individual. Probably speaking, there will always be a lot of young people, because they have to work hard (bad luck) but they don't get positive feedback, so they may gradually "black". If the society can't be very energetic and generates a large number of vertical mobility opportunities, then it will lead to the accumulation of "prominent fierce redistribution of wealth".

So, Buffett, Bill Gates, Ma Yun, Ma Huateng are really "not to see" bitcoin? Or is the statement that "bitcoin is a rat poison" is really "smearing" bitcoin? No, they also said a lot of meaningful words, but many people don't care.

We have always turned a blind eye to the major changes that have taken place in many societies. When we have undergone earth-shaking changes, we have come back and found that we have no sense of participation. Therefore, I regret that I have missed the great opportunity.

For most people, insight and involvement in participating in social change is indeed an effective way to achieve class leap. But wanting to “see and invest” requires a macro view and micro-insight, as well as a reserve of expertise.

In fact, Zhao Changpeng, Guo Hongcai, Shuai Chu····················································································· Then, now I am buying the bitcoin that I once sold at a high price.

We feel that we are accustomed to all kinds of subtle changes. In fact, we are always revealing the signals of great social changes. These "signals" will trigger tremendous changes in the whole society, resulting in a series of chain reactions, and there are also various kinds of responses. Opportunities and risks.

The ancients, the people who do not seek the overall situation are not enough to seek a thing. It is a common lesson that we generally lack to have a clear insight into the overall changes and historical processes of society as a whole, and then to find out how to find a way to settle down. That is, Lei Jun said that busy work is nothing more than tactical hard work to cover up the strategic laziness.

Many young people are often instilled with the idea of ​​“career planning”, but we often find that for mature professionals who have been working for 10 or 20 years, even after losing their jobs, they often don’t know why. This lack of strategy in life is comprehensive and universal, with no standard answers.

When you often regret that you "have not been able to seize a certain opportunity", have you ever thought about how to make a breakthrough in the basic strategy of knowledge network and how to capture and capture such opportunities. Maybe hearsay, you can get together and have a good time, but if you know it, you will probably fall into the net designed by others and become a prey.

The blockchain is of course a great invention, and of course it offers great opportunities for people like me who want to "squat the table" or want to "move the stool", but can you see where the "opportunity" is? Can you clearly locate your location? If not, why talk about "opportunities"!

Finally, I shared a paragraph from Mo Hailin’s founder, Qian Haitao: “I firmly believe that cryptocurrencies will change the world, replace the stock market, most currencies, and pay for machine-to-machine, Internet of Things, streaming media, and forecasting the market. Power, governance systems, voting systems, and even everything on the Internet. Having said that, cryptocurrencies still have a long way to go, and most of these areas are still at a very early stage."