You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An Existential Twist of the NPC MEME: The Fine Line Between Auto-Pilot and Cruise Control
Sorry, it's the first time I see the word careen. You're confusing two connotations of doubt. Yes, I cannot be certain at any moment in time, not 100%, that a car won't careen through my house. I can be certain within the limits of my reality that it won't happen. I'm not paranoid about it and if someone asks, I'll just say how unlikely it would be. But but it could happen if the conditions were right, and I obviously don't know if the conditions are right or not for that to happen.
Posted using Partiko Android
It seems you cannot be certain water will get you wet either in the same way that despite the abundant proof of "the realness of others" could simply be a spoof, no matter how unlikely or what a paranoid position that might be you cannot be certain.
Posted using Partiko Android
Yep, exactly.
Posted using Partiko Android
Real recognize real. Do you doubt your parents' reality or your siblings' your children's? Could you? Can something unreal beget something real, like you?
Posted using Partiko Android
of course
nope
If something unreal cannot beget something real why do you doubt anyone's realness, especially your parents?
Posted using Partiko Android
If they are not real, then they did not beget me and my origin is elsewhere but unknown. If they are real, they did. I assume they are real but I have to doubt it just like I doubt everything else.
Posted using Partiko Android
Your need to doubt it is quite needless 😀.
Here's the way for the proof you are seeming without any need for but necessitate it nonetheless:
By name I assume you're a woman (though I meet Sharon as a guy as well, which will make the experiment that much more problematic if you have a girls name 😋) and if you beget anyone than clearly, you'd have proof of their realness-as-you, and that the other person and their entire lineage going back to time immemorial, are also real, as real as your lineage. Another simpler test but not as veracious would be DNA, or more precisely, mDNA. If you cannot have children because guys are gross, maybe donating the egg would do? If all that is too much, fall back to getting a simple mDNA test done. Now comes the challenging part: will you be skeptical of the methodology of the testing as it will apply in a vast conspiracy to dupe you, to scam you, to pull a fast one on you for whatever reason if you chose the later?
Posted using Partiko Android
I'd say it's instead absurd to be content with being certain of something we lack evidence of.
Nope. I know I'm real because I think. I can't be certain that if I give birth to a child, the child's thoughts will be as real as mine because I will not be able to perceive them as I perceive mine. I'm not even certain I have hands, that I have a body, that I have a voice or that I can see. I am only certain that I think, that I exist, and that there is a reality (a reality with a nature that I cannot be certain of).