Journalists have expertise in certain things, and their expertise enables them to use their skills in their writing. @caitlinjohnstone, like all journalists, depends on her particular skill set. This is apparent in her dismissal of AGW skepticism, I note, as she is unlikely to have expertise in the field of meteorology, or any of the hard sciences that prove the alarmists are lying. 55mya CO2 was ~6000ppm, more than ten times what it is today, and life throve on the planet, including coral reefs, etc.. She probably doesn't know that, or why it matters to the AGW psyop. WUWT.com is a good place to learn actual facts regarding climate, and why it's impossible that people are changing it by emitting less CO2 in our entire history than one decent volcano unleashes in one blast.

Journalists with expertise in technical fields, a desire to surmount the hurdles deflecting from reporting such weapons, and an audience that will follow their work are scarce.

This is not only a natural phenomenon, but is actively capitalized on by those intent on effectively using those weapons. There are technical defenses for every technological weakness, and the more people aware of the weapons, the less effective those weapons become. We will all defend ourselves from an assailant weilding a knife openly while declaring their intent to attack us with it. If we neither know about the knife behind their back, nor their intent to attack us, we pose little defense.

There are mechanisms and devices deployed against voices that herald our people, and the kakacrats aren't shy about using them. Cody Wilson, who published plans to make a crappy plastic gun with 3D printers, won his cases at law regarding free speech and publishing such plans on the internet. So, he was - like Julian Assange - then prosecuted on a sex beef.

When you tilt at windmills, the windmill operators will stop you however they can.