MSM Finally Concedes Defeat On Yemen, Ceases Blackout Of Coverage

in media •  2 months ago

Last month, an article by Fair.org went viral in republications by popular alternative media outlets ranging from Salon to Zero Hedge to Alternet to Truthdig, among many others. The article was initially titled "ACTION ALERT: It’s Been Over a Year Since MSNBC Has Mentioned US War in Yemen", but many subsequent republications went with variations on the more attention-grabbing headline, "MSNBC has done 455 Stormy Daniels segments in the last year — but none on U.S. war in Yemen".

The centerpiece of the article was the following graphic, which I saw shared on its own many times in my social media feeds:

That's about as in your face as it gets, isn't it?

Ever since the Saudi-led assault on Yemen began in March of 2015, alternative media outlets everywhere have been repeatedly and aggressively decrying the mainstream media in the US and UK for their spectacular failure to adequately and accurately cover the violence and humanitarian disaster with appropriate reporting on who is responsible for it. After the 2016 US election, journalist Michael Tracey wrote an essay documenting how throughout the entire year and a half that Americans were pummeled with updates from the mass media about candidates and their campaigns, not one single question about Yemen was ever asked by any mainstream outlet of any candidate.

This is of course outrageous, but because of how media coverage works, mainstream attention was never drawn to the problem. It hasn't been a total media blackout, but because it only turns up in mainstream media reports every once in a while with little if any emphasis being placed on who is behind the devastation, it occupies a very peripheral place in western consciousness. The average American would probably be able to tell you that some parts of their government appear to be concerned about Russia, Syria, Iran and North Korea, because those rival nations have been the subject of intense mass media coverage, but if you asked them about Yemen you'd likely be told something like "I think there's some kind of humanitarian crisis there?", if anything.

This has all changed in the last few days. Suddenly, the atrocities being inflicted upon the people of Yemen are being pushed into mainstream attention by the mass media outlets which have been ignoring them for more than three years. The Washington Post editorial board published an op-ed titled "End U.S. support for this misbegotten and unwinnable war". CNN did some actual, real journalism for a change with a viral exclusive documenting which American war profiteers were behind some of the more devastating Saudi bombings. And yes, MSNBC finally did cover the violence in Yemen, breaking its year-long silence to report on a US-supplied bomb which killed 40 children with such urgent condemnation of those responsible you'd never know they'd been consistently ignoring such incidents which have been going on for years. Now politicians and celebrities everywhere are shoving the horror of their government facilitating the slaughter of innocents into mainstream attention.

What's interesting here is that nothing at all has changed except for the coverage. US-supplied bombs have been dropping on marketplaces, hospitals and funerals and slaughtering civilians in far more deadly incidents for years, and the US has also been providing extensive assistance to Saudi airstrikes, as well as attacking Yemeni targets directly. The only thing that has changed is that now it's being reported with an urgency and volume that is appropriate for such a horrific incident instead of an occasional low-profile mention with little or no mention of responsibility.

Nobody with their eyes open believes that the mainstream media have just suddenly developed a conscience and now deeply care about the mass murder of Middle Eastern civilians. So why the change? If you ask some of the Trump supporters I've seen responding to the shift, it's because their president can now be unfairly blamed for a military campaign which began long before he took office. But that doesn't really hold water, does it? I mean, the aforementioned year in which MSNBC didn't cover Yemen took place entirely during this administration, and every American with cable TV knows that MSNBC markets itself as the anti-Trump network. If they'd wanted to use Yemen as another angle from which to criticize this administration they would have done so, instead of not doing so at all. The entirety of mainstream media have been grossly neglecting this issue up until the last week despite having every opportunity to condemn Trump for it.

For the record, while we're on the subject, I personally don't much care if Trump gets all the blame for the Yemen catastrophe at this point. I've spent 2017 and 2018 fighting the insane corporate liberal notion that all American depravity began in January of last year, but at this point I'm happy with literally anything that just ends the death and devastation. A year into the war, the 30-year CIA veteran Bruce Riedel said that "if the United States of America and the United Kingdom tonight told King Salman that this war has to end, it would end tomorrow, because the Royal Saudi Airforce cannot operate without American and British support.” If using this as an opportunity to attack Trump creates the necessary political pressure to end the bombings, blockades, starvation and disease that is killing untold thousands of Yemeni civilians, then fine, whatever, I'm all for it.

But again, from what I'm seeing right now I don't believe that this is about Trump. Not directly anyway. From what I can see right now, I think what we are witnessing is a clear instance in which alternative media successfully caused the establishment to lose control of the narrative on an important issue.

In the US, criticism of Saudi Arabia is nearly as taboo as criticism of Israel. As we saw explained in a leaked State Department memo last year, it is standard US policy to use human rights abuses as a bludgeon with which to attack rival governments, while sweeping the atrocities committed by allies under the rug. Because of its lucrative petrodollar deal with the US, and because its opaque and unaccountable monarchy makes it capable of nefarious maneuvers to advance geopolitical agendas that an ostensible democracy would have a hard time getting away with, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is one of America's most important allies. And the plutocrat-owned media, whose controllers have a vested interest in protecting the establishment upon which their kingdoms are built, consistently fall right in line with that same State Department policy.

This, and the fact that the control of a key strategic region is at stake, is why we've been seeing the Saudi war crimes in Yemen and the US facilitation thereof downplayed for years by the mass media. And they would surely remain downplayed indefinitely were it possible.

But it wasn't possible. The story kept getting pushed toward mainstream consciousness year after year, and eventually the fact that an outlet which upholds itself as the flag bearer of Trump's opposition has been completely ignoring this administration's facilitation of war crimes was made viral. At a certain point a Dem-voting audience which is being told day in and day out that Trump presents a unique and unprecedented level of danger to the world will lose trust in the outlets which market themselves to that demographic if they refuse to make a big deal about the fact that this administration is helping tyrants murder busloads of children.

For this reason, western mainstream media have been forced to finally report on the cruelty being inflicted upon the people of Yemen by Saudi Arabia and its allies in order to avoid losing credibility. The story got out, and the story about their lack of coverage of that story got out, and now they're all reporting on it like they've been doing so this entire time. Which, if it continues, will make it very difficult for the US/UK/Saudi war machine to retain the consent of the governed for its mass slaughter.

In my opinion, we can safely call this a win for alternative media. The voices who aren't beholden to the empire and its geopolitical agendas refused to let this story die, and eventually succeeded in overtaking the dominant narrative. Not because media-controlling oligarchs like Brian L Roberts and Jeff Bezos gave them permission to, but because unauthorized truth was spoken and carried by many ordinary people into mainstream consciousness via Facebook shares, Twitter retweets and speaking out loud and proud wherever possible. A people's information battle was fought and won by the people.

If things go as I am hoping they will go, we will see more and more such populist hijackings of dominant narratives in the future, and ultimately a failure of the oligarchs to continue manufacturing consent for their omnicidal, ecocidal, Orwellian agendas. We will have to be aggressive, we will have to be creative, and we will have to be interesting enough to catch the eye of the casual citizenry, but the fact that trust in the mass media is at an all-time low and our ability to network and share information is at an all-time high combines with the fact that we have truth on our side to create some very exciting possibilities. I find this all very encouraging.


The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to get on the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I rarely disagree with the main ideas of @caitlinjohnstone's work.

I disagree with the apathy of motive expressed in this piece, though. I think there's something else afoot.

I personally don't much care if Trump gets all the blame for the Yemen >catastrophe at this point. I've spent 2017 and 2018 fighting the insane corporate liberal notion that all American depravity began in January of last year, but at this point I'm happy with literally anything that just ends the death and devastation.

Appears you read my mind

Even the dead little children did not make it to the news here in Netherlands. I watch R&U channel on YouTube so am up to date albeit one sided.

For this reason, western mainstream media have been forced to finally report on the cruelty being inflicted upon the people of Yemen by Saudi Arabia and its allies in order to avoid losing credibility. ...

In my opinion, we can safely call this a win for alternative media.

This is part of some bigger strategy going on here... not from pressure of the alt media.
This has been screamed about by alt media since it began - with total disregard by the MSM... until now.

They are doing it now for another reason....(imo)

Time to use war for profit. Shift the narrative. Pretend to cover "real news" and blame it on Drumpf.

The corporate media is so screwed. They've lost all sense of legitimacy.

Too little too late, I hope.

It's great that it is now in the news and has the attention it deserves in the mainstream. Unfortunately though, this is a common tactic with the media. They ignore these stories deliberately until it's too late and then they start covering the story after hundreds of thousands are already dead (if not millions). To Me it almost feels orchestrated in a way for them to redeem their reputation amongst some of those who may be critical of their efforts.

·

I think there is a play going on here somehow.
They don't suddenly start reporting this after years of silence, because of the alt media..
They are doing this for something bigger, to suit _their_agenda...

·
·

Heh... Agreed!

·
·

Yes, I agree...I think it has a lot to do with the election cycle!

·
·
·

Ah yes I didn't think of that. The election cycle. The pundits will be talking about it in the mid-term elections coming up in America. Can't let go of a good tragedy for politicizing. How awful.

this is why I dropped a follow some time ago.
resteem

A bus filled with children has been bombed. A red line has been crossed.

It's great that they are covering the atrocities but like others I am suspicious. What's their end-game? They always have one. They don't just cover humanitarian crises because those who oppose war and killing have been talking about it forever. I am grateful more people have seen it but I am just waiting for the metaphorical other shoe to drop.

Wow Caitlin,
I hope you're right. "I think what we are witnessing is a clear instance in which alternative media successfully caused the establishment to lose control of the narrative on an important issue." I've been pondering the same theories, whether the MSM just suddenly decided to go after this issue in their hatred of President Trump, or what could be the cause of the sudden shift. If your theory is true, then maybe, just maybe there's hope that we will finally shine a light on the atrocities we've committed in Syria.

I feel the exact same way as your statement: "I personally don't much care if Trump gets all the blame for the Yemen catastrophe at this point. I've spent 2017 and 2018 fighting the insane corporate liberal notion that all American depravity began in January of last year, but at this point I'm happy with literally anything that just ends the death and devastation."

A Yemeni in my newsfeed posts cries for help every single day. It didn't just happen. He's been posting them for as long as he's been on my friends list. And the Syrians have been posting their pleas in my newsfeed to deaf ears since 2013.

The world is a better place because of truth tellers like you. Keep doing what you're doing. Much love. XO

The comparison of Stormy with Yemen also applies to how MSM reports on wikilieaks related news. Julian is silenced to death just like Yemen. the MSM entertain people to death with the use of what ever they can come up with. Stormy Trumpy Russia Putin BS they blow out of proportion. All couch potatoes get outraged about meaningless shit. And they eat the shit like sweet cookies. Trump made a lewd comment WHAAAAAAAAAA. But at the same time those very people are surfing the web for Stormy weather. Triggered by the MSM, distracted by the entertainment industry. Stormy's 'owner' is the one getting rich of 'milking' her work. As she most likely has a contract that owns her. This is just one example of how they do this time and time again. In every country they have another spin of this. Sometimes they blow up a meaningless political dispute between a Prime Minister and an anti muslim opponent.
Other times they use a celebrity scandal. Not even a real scandal, they cook it up. Or judt use the latest Trump Russia BS. The whole of Europe is 'occupied' worse with Trump Russia crap then wall street ever was with protesters. Occupy wall street was only a short event, Occupy Europe's media is 24/7 for 2 years already.