You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 2nd Amendment Traitor Matt Walsh - As Bad As A Rapist In His Own Words
The leaps in logic here are quite impressive.
Matt Walsh sucks because he comments on topics he writes! He belittled people based on how many followers they have (likely a character flaw)
Let's talk about an anti Trump tweet from 19 months ago...
Somehow you're talking about 2nd Amendment rights and extrapolating Hillary's nuclear fallout (Russia/Syria), lol. Logic fail.
Let's title this post and compare him to a rapist....
Dude. There's no journalistic integrity here.
I quit reading after "he totally conspired to blacklist (no method, just calling them out I guess) of Trump supporters". (No proof). Immediately followed by "this hardline stance should be especially rejected by 2nd Amendment supporters..."
And you admit you didn't read the whole article, then criticise the title. Well, here is the article which was not linked but named in my article where Walsh says a false rape accusation is as bad as rape:
http://themattwalshblog.com/2014/12/09/false-rape-accusations-just-evil-rape/
I know you will make excuses because you've exposed your stupidity by commenting and admitting you didn't read, but most people will find it inconsistent that Walsh regurgitates phony rape accusations and writes articles like this.
Sorry, the links didn't paste in with the story. There were links to the Breitbart article about the effort made by Amanda Carpenter and Matt Walsh to create a blacklist. You are pretty lazy, as I would certainly have googled it before I made a comment like yours.
"Somehow you're talking about 2nd Amendment rights and extrapolating Hillary's nuclear fallout (Russia/Syria), "
strawman logic fail on your own part buddy. Anyone who read that (and didn't just skim and try to act like they read it) would understand I was making the point that Walsh argued that there was no functional difference between Hillary and Trump for him. Trump is literally the only person who has kept us out of war in Syria. I doubt you even understand the Petrodollar and why so many neocons want a war in Syria. (so that Quatar/Saudi can get its NG pipeline through Syria and break the Russian monopoly on NG into Europe). If it is too big a leap for you to understand that that one candidate wants to go to war with a nuclear power over the middle east makes a difference to a voter, then maybe it does make no difference to you.
But here is the final proof that you don't even merit a response from a person like me you use a quote "he totally conspired (sic forgot to end your quote). That is something that I never wrote in my article. Here is the link with the proof for anyone who cares about the truth http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/18/gop-smart-set-plots-blacklist-of-trump-supporters/
The proof that you are way too simple to get what is going on and properly advocate for the libertarian principle you claim to espouse is contained in your response. You really should stop and wait until you are a little more awake, because a person like you is just going to help the bad guys without meaning to.