[Math Talk #1]. Periodic Functions and Fundamental Period

in #math8 years ago (edited)

PeriodicFunction_1000.gif
Readers who are interested in mathematics already know what periodic functions are. But to be complete, here is the formal definition of periodic function.


Definition 1. (Periodic Function)

A function is said to be periodic if there exists such that


for all .   Any such is called a period of .


The most famous periodic functions are trigonometric functions, such as
or ; both are -periodic functions. Now the question is, does there exist such that


for all ? Well if does, then by trigonometric identity,

so that for integer . Therefore, there is no such between and . This implies that is the smallest period of (similar reasoning, as well).

From this example, we can naturally define the fundamental period as follows.


Definition 2. (Fundamental Period)

For periodic function , we define


to be fundamental period of if .


The existence of is clear by completeness of Real numbers; since the set of periods of periodic function is bounded below by . The real question is then,

Is always true for all periodic functions?

For the particular case when the functions are trigonometric, the answer was YES; we've just showed that . However, in general the answer is NO!


Example 1. Periodic Functions with no Fundamental Period

Consider

Take to be any positive rational number. Then for all regardless of the fact that is rational or not. (Check it!). This means that the whole set of positive rational numbers is period of ;


From this example, we can deduce some important facts about periodic functions not having fundamental periods. What does it mean for a function to be periodic with no fundamental period? Well, it is stated in the following theorem.


Theorem 1.

If is non-constant, continuous at one point and periodic, then has fundamental period. Furthermore, the fundamental period itself is also a period of .

Proof.   Assume that has no fundamental period. Then we can construct a strictly decreasing sequence of periods of ; namely such that .   Define


The function is well defined, since is compact and is continuous. Since is a period, supremum and infinium of at is equal to supremum and infimum at whole set . Now, taking , by continuity of , . This implies that the global oscillation of is zero; a constant function. This is contradiction; should have fundamental period . Again take a sequence of periods of ; such that . Using continuity,


and we are done.


This theorem tells us that except for constant function, any example of periodic functions with no fundamental period should be discontinuous everywhere (as we have seen in Example 1). But we are not done yet. The final question remains.

Classification of Periodic Functions???

The question is directly related to examining the set



We only examined the** infimum**, not the whole set itself. This will be discussed in Math talk #2.

Conclusion of Math Talk #1

  • Periodic functions not always have fundamental period.
  • If it does not have fundamental period, then it should be discontinuous everywhere or constant.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.33
JST 0.093
BTC 62737.20
ETH 1764.48
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.39