WWBHSASH? — What Would Bill Hicks Say About Sandy Hook?: Part One — by Hugh Mungus
THE BIG SNOW GLOBE
"We sailed away
We walked two thousand miles
And then we slipped away
We looked so hard
But couldn’t seem to find just what
The world was for
Now we know
Just what the journey’s for
Looking out to the stars
Think about what you are
What do they think of you
Animals in their zoo
They haven’t got the time
Landing’s not on their mind
How do they have the nerve
We’re animals in preserve" *
― Zebra *
- Zebra:
Humanity is on a roll like radioactive sushi following the Fukushima meltdowns. Deluding ourselves we live in a paradigm where slavery is abolished, we rarely stop to appreciate the fact we’re all slaves.
What’s different between you and a peasant living in bondage during the 1700s? You perform work you wouldn’t engage in if not being coerced; you’re held in check from experiencing all life offers, forced to remain in a restrictive area ― known as Earth.
Money comprises your shackles, but only so long as you allow it to. Even though you don’t physically see your implements of incarceration, you experience them every time you can’t take a trip because you don’t have the cash. You feel these restraints when spending weeks on end in your house, unable to venture out because you’re broke.
So, who does this system benefit? In a protracted sense, nobody ― since we could all be victims of a natural occurrence that annihilates us while we’re busy playing house. Yes, in such a scenario, it seems even those acting as our jailers would suffer. In the short term, a small faction ― possibly one percent ― are reaping rewards of this prison infrastructure, while the rest of us struggle to stay alive.
So, what’s better? Seeing your servitude, or remaining oblivious to it?
The former. You’re not living a lie ― spending your days aboard It’s a Small World in Fantasyland. Thus, you understand there’s a problem, and can do something about it.
Still don’t believe you’re a slave? The next time you’re incurring a verbal ass whipping from an enraged customer, or losing a limb inside the jaws of occupational machinery, tell yourself you’re free. How many times a week do you wake up elated to go to work? Everywhere you turn, miserable individuals are clock-watching ― counting the minutes until they can leave their jobs for the day.
“How’re things, Ed?”
“I’ll be a hell of a lot better in half an hour [the time when Ed is allowed to step away from a hazardous container of boiling grease he continually fills with GMO foodstuffs].”
You hear it constantly. Some version of the above is probably more often uttered than, “If only I could win the lottery.”
Even when you’re told soft stool is chocolate pudding, it remains shit. Just because you’re informed it’s a job, it’s still slavery. If you have any lingering doubts, ask yourself if you’d go to work if you weren’t getting paid. There’s your answer.
What’s more, folks not only embrace their imprisonment, they fight to retain it. The initial action someone usually engages in, when fired from a job, is the desperate search for new employment ― hence, further enslavement.
The powers that be ― who’ve created this serfdom ― must find it amusing people aren’t only willing to be vassals, they seek it out.
But jobs are necessary, right? By engaging in them we’re doing our part for the benefit of our species, correct?
Wrong. With the current level of human technology on this planet, almost all jobs we’re informed are essential can be executed via automation; i.e. machines. **
** Berkowitz, Matt; Joseph, Peter; McLeish, Ben. (2014). The Zeitgeist Movement Defined: Realizing a New Train of Thought. CreateSpace. ISBN: 1495303195
So, how did all this begin? Are we experiments? Lab rats in a maze created by a more technologically advanced species? Known as the zoo hypothesis, it may be more possible than we’ve been previously lead to believe.
Termed Goldilocks planets, outside of Earth itself, Kepler-22b was the first of its kind discovered by humans. *** **** This class of celestial bodies possesses the necessary attributes to support life. In the limited scope of scientists, that equates to close enough to the star it’s orbiting to melt ice ― creating water ― but not so close this precious life-giving commodity evaporates. In addition, a Goldilocks planet is one with a size relative to Earth. Goldilocks: not too hot, not too cold; not too big, not too small. Just right.
*** Goldilocks planets:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstellar_habitable_zone
**** Keppler 22-b:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler-22b
Of course, it’s always possible innumerable, exoplanetary species can survive without water ― perhaps on methane gas, pure hydrogen, etc. To placate the narrow spectrum of propagandists doubling as scientists, when it comes to Goldilocks planets, we’ll adhere to the official definition.
That said, it’s speculated by astronomers perhaps 40 billion of these potentially life-sustaining celestial bodies exist in the Milky Way, alone. Believed the above galaxy is one of hundreds of billions within this Universe, we’re talkin’ trillions of planets able to support life.
Since many of these viable biospheres are billions of years older than Earth, it’s a certainty other species have had far more time to advance than we have. Asserting humans are alone in this Universe is a position more filled with shit than an impacted bowel. Thus, we might be no more than entertainment for others looking on.
If the above is true, is it possible humans on Earth are existing inside a snow globe, watched by interlopers of advanced acumen? Sounds more plausible than being observed by some gigantic, invisible, gray-haired asshole in the sky, who obviously doesn’t care about us. Still, most go with the latter.
Concerning the snow globe analogy, everything within this pristine milieu appears idyllic. That said, figures inside remain stagnant. Sounds like humanity, doesn’t it? People allegedly stopped going to the Moon 42 years ago, and haven’t returned since, nor anywhere else in this Solar System. As a substitute, we’ve managed to murder each other in droves.
Statues inside the snow globe look cheerful, even though they’re drowning underwater. When you consider the current state of our species ― unknowingly enslaved by money, unwittingly forced to consume poisons, and ignorant of the radioactive fallout deluging us ― we resemble those fixed figurines. Submerged in a lethal environment, we smile ― garbed in prison uniforms, disguised as suits ― and do nothing to end our plight.
Even though quotes from astronauts, government and military representatives, pilots and scientists ― regarding the validity of UFOs ― are ubiquitous, you may still believe this is a phenomenon only experienced by individuals certain “each other” is one word, of the mindset “are” and “our” mean the same thing, and adamantly convinced Democrats are different from Republicans. “You know? Morons.” *****
***** Blazing Saddles:
What follows are portions of official government documents proving otherwise:
In 1947, Four-Star General ― and former Chief of Staff for the U.S. Air Force ― Nathan Twining, wrote what is known as the Twining Memo. This letter was intended for General George Shulgen, who was interested in those bizarre “flying discs” so many had been reporting:
"It is the opinion that the phenomenon being reported is something real and not visionary or fictitious. The reported operating characteristics such as extreme rates of climb, maneuverability (particularly in roll), and action with which must be considered evasive when sighted…lend belief to the possibility that some of the objects are controlled either manually, automatically or remotely."
A 1949 FBI Memo ― known as Protection of Vital Installations ― discussed concern regarding aerial anomalies over Los Alamos nuclear facility. Said conundrums ― according to “Airline Pilots; Military Pilots, Los Alamos Security Inspectors, and private citizens” ― maneuvered at speeds upwards of 27,000 miles per hour. This memorandum was sent to J. Edgar Hoover ― director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation:
"Army intelligence has recently said that the matter of 'Unidentified Aircraft' or 'Unidentified Aerial Phenomena,' otherwise known as 'Flying Discs,' 'Flying Saucers,' and 'Balls of Fire,' is considered top secret by intelligence officers of both the Army and the Air Forces."
A subject clandestinely deemed confidential, even though the public was led to believe UFOs were nothing more than mirages, misidentified man-made aircraft and natural occurrences.
Known as the 1952 Chadwell Memo, the following was sent from H. Marshall Chadwell ― CIA Director of Scientific Intelligence ― to General Walter Bedell Smith ― Director of the Central Intelligence Agency:
"At this time, the reports of incidents convince us that there is something going on that must have immediate attention…Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitudes and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles."
Termed the 1954 Maxwell Air Force Base Emergency Report, the following was forwarded to the CIA, NSA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
"…pilot of helicopter wished to stress fact that the object was of a saucer-like nature, was stationary at 2000 ft."
Here’s a germane question: What aircraft in 1954 was circular and able to hover?
The internal document below references the Minot Air Force Base Incident of 1966 — an enigmatic encounter corroborated by three missile installations, and lasting almost four hours. Military radar painted this object ― which ascended as high as 100,000 feet ― and was visually observed by an Air Force strike team:
"When the team was about ten miles from the landing site, static disrupted radio contact with them. Five to eight minutes later, the glow diminished, and the UFO took off. Another UFO was visually sighted and confirmed by radar. The one that was first sighted passed beneath the second. Radar also confirmed this. The first made for altitude toward the north, and the second seemed to disappear with the glow of red."
Regarding a 1976 UFO encounter over Tehran, Iran, the U.S. government had the following to assert:
"An outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria necessary for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon:
a) the object was seen by multiple witnesses from different locations…and viewpoints.
b) the credibility of many of the witnesses was high (an Air Force general, qualified air crews, and experienced radar operators).
c) visual sightings were confirmed by radar.
d) similar electromagnetic effects (EME) were reported by three separate aircraft.
e) there were physiological effects on some crew members (i.e. loss of night vision due to the brightness of the object).
f) an inordinate amount of maneuverability was displayed by the UFOs."
Although countless humans cavalierly cavort about as though they’re the epitome of intelligence, are we no more than microbial pond scum in someone else’s Petri dish? Perpetually smiling figurines within a cosmic snow globe?
Since our kind is held captive on this planet, unable to escape, should the heavenly hammer strike, it definitely seems possible.
Sources:
Books:
Berkowitz, Matt; Joseph, Peter; McLeish, Ben. (2014). The Zeitgeist Movement Defined: Realizing a New Train of Thought. CreateSpace. ISBN: 1495303195
Dolan, Richard M. (2014). UFOs for the 21st Century Mind: A Fresh Guide to an Ancient Mystery. Richard Dolan Press. ISBN: 9781495291609
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: PART ONE
"It’s all about money, not freedom, y’all, okay? Nothing to do with fuckin’ freedom. If you think you’re free, try going somewhere without fucking money, okay?"
― Bill Hicks
The United States Constitution is not valid. Thus, you're not bound by it. This is something most people don't know.
The Constitution is a contract between government and citizenry. Such is clear.
In this document, rules are established regarding how the bureaucracy will operate, and the populace will conduct itself.
One of the striking inconsistencies, regarding the Constitution, is the benefits bestowed upon government, at the expense of the population. Via the above agreement, bureaucracy reaps rewards, while the masses receive nothing in return.
Don't believe me? Consider the following:
Congress can tax you. Can you tax Congress?
If you don't pay these taxes, the government can extort from you; i.e. steal your home, your cars, your bank accounts, etc. Can you do the same to the government?
The U.S. hegemony "magically" makes laws you're forced to abide by. Can you create statutes out of thin air that bind it? Moreover, if this bureaucracy doesn't adhere to your mandates, can you throw it in jail?
The answer to the above questions is: "No," so why would you sign such a lopsided pact? Do you often find yourself scrawling your name in agreement on obviously unbalanced arrangements?
"Let me get this straight: You're gonna force me to do things that only benefit you?"
"Yep."
"And you're gonna charge me for this coercion?"
"That's right."
"On top of this, if I don't pay, you've given yourself the power to throw me in prison?!
"You got it."
"Where do I sign?!?"
Speaking of signatures, when — in this fucked-up system we refer to as "legal" — are contracts binding?
When you sign them, of course.
Being the U.S. Constitution is a contract, did you sign it? I know I didn't. In fact, none of the common citizenry signed the fuckin' Constitution!
"Wait! I thought this was a democracy; you know, a government by the people. If none of the people signed it's main mandate, how can it be anything but a government by somebody else?"
Since none of the common populace — neither alive during its inception, nor kickin' today — signed the Constitution, how can we the people be bound by it? Only those who did sign it — politicians who've been dead hundreds of years — should be obligated to it.
Like a fully-charged digital camera, you're getting the picture. So, a bunch of monetarily affluent psychopaths — many of them slave owners — scrawled their signatures on this agreement that imprisons us on our behalf. Ask yourself, who doesn't trust a slave owner? Somebody willing to subjugate another person is willing to subjugate you — since you're another person.
Why, then, wouldn't you expect a group of rich overlords to attempt to enslave the population of an entire country? We're talkin' deal of a lifetime here! Individually, they may have owned a few hundred folk, at most. With the implementation of their Constitution, they had the opportunity to own a few million!
According to No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, by advocate of natural law, Lysander Spooner:
"It is a general principle of law and reason, that a written instrument binds no one until he has signed it. This principle is so inflexible a one, that even though a man is unable to write his name, he must still "make his mark," before he is bound by a written contract. This custom was established years ago, when few men could write their names; when a clerk — that is, a man who could write — was so rare and valuable a person, that even if he were guilty of high crimes, he was entitled to pardon, on the ground that the public could not afford to lose his services. Even at that time, a written contract must be signed; and men who could not write, either 'made their mark,' or signed their contracts by stamping their seals upon wax affixed to the parchment on which their contracts were written. Hence the custom of affixing seals, that has continued to this time."
What's more, the U.S. Constitution was enacted hundreds of years ago, before you or I were born, let alone old enough to sign anything. How can a contract created centuries ago bind you, me, or anyone else living today? Wouldn't we have to be provided a copy of this agreement, and then given the choice to sign it on our own, before we were obligated by it?
Typically — again, according to our insane code of "legalities" — we're not bound by contracts unless we're sent copies of them. Were you provided a copy of the Constitution?
I wasn't. Hence, according to the "rules" we've created for ourselves, this dissolute document isn't binding upon us.
If I was sent a copy of this insanity, there's no way I'd sign such a forfeiture of my natural abilities. Abandon the freedom we all possess prior to being under government rule? I'll pass like soft stool through a greased sphincter.
Again, in 1870, Lysander Spooner summed up the situation:
"Moreover, a written instrument must, in law and reason, not only be signed, but must also be delivered to the party (or to some one for him), in whose favor it is made, before it can bind the party making it. The signing is of no effect, unless the instrument be also delivered. […] The Constitution was not only never signed by anybody, but it was never delivered by anybody, or to anybody's agent or attorney. It can therefore be of no more validity as a contract, then can any other instrument that was never signed or delivered."
If you don't receive a copy of your phone bill, how can you pay it? Moreover, how can you be bound by it? You can easily win the case you weren't provided proper notification of this contract — which is the reason citizens aren't bequeathed copies of the Constitution. If they were, few would be stupid enough to sign them.
To quote Lysander Spooner:
"If the people of this country wish to maintain such a government as the Constitution describes, there is no reason in the world why they should not sign the instrument itself, and thus make known their wishes in an open, authentic manner […] But the people have never been asked to sign it. And the only reason why they have never been asked to sign it, has been that […] it is not what any sensible man wants for himself; nor such as he has any right to impose upon others. It is, to all moral intents and purposes, as destitute of obligations as the compacts which robbers and thieves and pirates enter into with each other, but never sign."
Are we to believe powers — self-bequeathed those who created the Constitution — magically transfer to their descendants? Since a bunch of slave owners gave themselves the right to rule our ancestors, their lineage today has the right to rule us?
The more you research the U.S. Constitution, the more you realize it's just another tool for control. It's no different than any other corrupt government's dogma employed to enslave its citizenry. The Constitution isn't even better camouflaged than the propaganda promulgated by other regimes.
Are we foolish enough to believe Hitler informed the German populace they were mass murderers, annihilating innocent men, women and children?
Of course Adolf spun his diabolical designs to make genocide delicious — a benefit of the greater good. And the people obviously bought it. No matter how evil der Fuhrer was, he couldn't have killed millions of humans, himself. He would've required the population of a country, willing to pull the triggers for him.
The same holds true for George Bush or Barack Obama. Both are psychopathic mass murderers, but it would've been impossible for these two clowns to exterminate over a million people in Iraq, if U.S. soldiers hadn't done it for them.
In the words of songwriter Donovan:
"And he's fighting for Democracy
He's fighting for the Reds
He says it's for the peace of all
He's the one who must decide
Who's to live and who's to die
And he never sees the writing on the wall
But without him
How would Hitler have condemned them at Dachau?
Without him Caesar would have stood alone
He's the one who gives his body
As a weapon of the war
And without him all this killing can't go on.
He's the Universal Soldier and he really is to blame" ***
*** Donovan:
Since taxation is extortion, consider the gall displayed by the government in its criminal demands. When a thief robs you at gunpoint, at least he's honest. His intentions are clear, and he doesn't lie about them. When the government purloins from you, it claims to do so for your benefit. As perceptively stated by Lysander Spooner:
"The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the roadside, and holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful.
The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit. He does not pretend to be anything but a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a 'protector,' and that he takes men's money against their will, merely to enable him to 'protect' these infatuated travelers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection. He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful 'sovereign,' on account of the 'protection' he affords you. He does not keep 'protecting' you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands."
You've heard it before: Politicians are public servants; representatives of the people. It's a lie. How can you be subservient to someone if you can tax them, but they can't tax you? How can you represent somebody if you can force laws upon them, but they can't do so to you? Obviously, we the people are the servants here, and the government, our masters — even though we're brainwashed to believe otherwise.
And how about the process by which our overlords become such? We're talkin' selection by secret ballots. Anything that has to be done clandestinely should be viewed as suspect.
You vote, but since such is conducted in secret, how can we be certain the government hasn't lied to us about the results? It lies to us about everything else. Why should we suddenly believe bureaucracies when it comes to outcomes of elections?
In the words of Lysander Spooner:
"Men honestly engaged in attempting to establish justice in the world, have no occasion thus to act in secret […]
The secret ballot makes a secret government; and a secret government is a secret band of robbers and murderers. Open despotism is better than this. The single despot stands out in the face of all men, and says: I am the State: My will is law: I am your master: I take responsibility of my acts: the only arbiter I acknowledge is the sword: If anyone denies my right, let him try conclusions with me. […]
The gross number of these secret votes, or what purports to be their gross number, in different localities, is occasionally published. Whether these reports are accurate or not, we have no means of knowing. It is generally supposed that great frauds are often committed in depositing them. They are understood to be received and counted by certain men, who are themselves appointed for that purpose by the same secret process by which all other officers and agents of the band are selected."
So, you've got votes tallied in secret by record keepers — who were, themselves, appointed surreptitiously. The Constitution awards whomever wins these ludicrous elections powers we, the people, don't possess. These abilities allow for thievery of us, under threat of extortion and imprisonment, should we not comply--
Does a dick have to be un-lubed before you realize it's fucking you?!
In addition, a secret ballot means those elected won't be accountable for their promises. You voted for a politician because he pledged a freeway that would reduce your drive time to the slavery known as your job. Once this slug is in office, he fails to keep his word, and no freeway is built.
You're pissed, asserting you voted for this loser because he made a commitment he's refusing to honor. That said, you have no recourse. You're mired in a system which elects its leaders via secret ballot. There's no way you can verify you voted for this guy. Hence, he can simply claim you're lying, and there's nothing you can do about it. Your anonymous ballot is somewhere amongst multitudinous other anonymous ballots.
Speaking of politicians, how many times have you heard this crap:
"As a nation, we're so far in debt it's crippling us. Our children are our future, and unless we can pay off this financial obligation, our progeny may not have a country to call their own."
Aw, fuck! The keyboard's covered in shit!
First off, money's debt. Anytime you provide something with intrinsic value, in exchange for useless pieces of paper called cash, you're in arrears. Hence, as long as there's money, there's debt. Great news, though. Money also doesn't exist. Its value is illusory, and only a factor as long as we believe it so. Hence, if we stop giving legitimacy to money, that "debt" these fucknuts keep crammin' down our throats — which never existed in the first place — fails to be a problem for us.
Second, I never signed any contract — known as the Constitution — claiming I'd pay the debt these politicians have accrued. Hence, according to your own legalese, I don't owe anything.
"You spent a trillion dollars bombing yet another territory filled with brown people, and now you want me to pay your debt so you can create more weapons and do it all over again? Fuck off! Where's the contract I signed obligating me to pay your debt? You can't produce it, because it doesn't exist."
Gotta reference ol' Lysander again on this one:
"On general principles of law and reason, debts contracted in the name of 'the United States,' or of 'the people of the United States,' are of no validity. It is utterly absurd to pretend that debts to the amount of twenty-five hundred millions of dollars are binding upon thirty-five or forty millions of people, when there is not a particle of legitimate evidence — such as would be required to prove a private debt — that can be produced against any one of them, that he, or his properly authorized attorney, ever contracted to pay one cent.
Certainly, neither the whole people of the United States, nor any number of them, ever separately or individually contracted to pay a cent of these debts."
Why do we afford the U.S. Constitution — a contract that enslaves us — special privilege we'd never provide any other agreement? What the hell's wrong with us?!
The government will force you to do this, and strong arm you to do that, but — should you view the situation logically — it's a paper tiger.
First off, none of us own anything. See The Red Pill blog **** for proof of that, but the government really doesn't own anything. Ponder the depth of the bullshit pool you have to be drowning in to believe the government owns something!
**** The Red Pill: Take It:
http://www.theredpill1.weebly.com/
"Step away from the White House lawn, or I'll be forced to shoot you! This is government property!"
Are you kidding me? The taxes we the people paid funded the White House, its lawn, the maintenance of that lawn, the guard pointing the gun at you, the gun itself, the bullets in that gun, etc. The government doesn't own anything! If there were human owners of this crap — which there aren't — it would be the people.
L.S., take it away, brotha':
"They [the government] do indeed pretend to own large tracts of wild lands, lying between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, and between the Gulf of Mexico and the North Pole. But, on general principles of law and reason, they might as well pretend to own the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans themselves; or the atmosphere and the sunlight; and to hold them, and dispose of them, for the payment of these debts."
Ruminate on the absurdity of man-made laws, which are no more than threats.
"If you don't do what we demand, we'll take away everything you have!"
"If you contradict the rules we've made for you, we'll throw you in jail!"
Reduce it to fundamentals, and see if it doesn't sound ridiculous. If you were told you could be imprisoned for taking a leaf across an imaginary line, would you believe it?
Of course not.
Yet, purchase pot in Colorado "legally," and drive into Kansas, and you can be arrested, and thrown in jail for years. What part of this bullshit doesn't sound insane to you? What portion of it doesn't wreak of control? You have a plant in your possession, and you just crossed a make-believe line, for fuck's sake!
So, the next time you're buying fireworks in preparation to celebrate your "freedom" on July 4th, ask yourself what you're free from. Autonomy? Logic? Sanity? How can you be free, if your entire life consists of doing things you abhor, cowering to threats others have forced upon you and battling extortionists? Yeah, you've been duped. We all have. Now, do something about it.
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: PART TWO
The United States Constitution is a bombastic version of the playground bully demanding your milk money, in exchange for "protection." We're talkin' unexpurgated Mafia intimidation here.
In this literary lunacy, the U.S. government simply bequeaths itself "powers" out of thin air. Then again, what would you expect from a document written in secret by monetarily upscale slave owners?
Since most people have never read the Constitution, but take for granted it has their best interests in mind, let's go page by page, and break this maniacal missive down, dispelling such a fallacious belief.
The document in question begins with:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union…"
Translation: "We the slave owners who wrote this document in secret…"
Next up, we've got:
"ARTICLE 1
Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."
Who gave Congress these "Powers"? Not the public. Once again the slave owners who wrote the Constitution bestowed them from the ether. It's as if they, themselves, waved Tinkerbell's magic wand, and these rights appeared.
"Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States…"
The House of Representatives is chosen via secret ballot, tallied by the slave owners. Leonard Nimoy will do a cameo in the next Star Trek movie before outcomes of these polls are recorded honestly.
"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union…"
Taxes are extortion. Period. "If you don't pay us what we demand, we'll take everything you have, and throw you in prison!" These slave owners granted themselves the power to steal from us.
"The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and the other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."
So, the people can't impeach? Only those the slave owners placed in positions of power can? Being tied to a chair, during a candlelit dinner with a ravenous cannibal, is starting to sound more appealing than believing in the Constitution.
"Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy […]."
No chance for suppression and lies there.
"If I don't wanna tell you something, I now gave myself the power to declare it a 'necessary secret' — for your own good — and I can hide whatever I want from you, the populace."
How many times have we been told we — the people who supposedly run this non-existent thing called America — must be kept in the dark for the sake of "national security"? Talk about a catchall phrase in which those in control can hide whatever they want.
"Well, I fucked 12 kids, your wife, three deer and the couch cushion you're currently sitting on, whilst shitting in that stew you just ate, as I simultaneously drained your bank account. The reason I didn't tell you this before was because such information is detrimental to 'national security.' "
"Section 6. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States."
A "Law" which the monetarily wealthy slave owners wrote.
"Think I'll pay myself $10,000,000."
Potential corruption? How?! Like an over-excited penis in your face, you can't see this coming?!
"Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it becomes a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approve he shall sign it […]."
Nowhere here are the people involved in this process. Man-made laws are nothing more than threats: "Do what we demand, or be thrown in prison."
"Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…"
Congress, which is the government, just gave itself the power to tax; i.e. the "right" to extort from you.
"The Congress shall have Power To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States…"
When the government creates money, it's "legal." When you do the same, it's counterfeiting?! Again, I thought this was a democracy — a government by the people. If such was the case, shouldn't the money the people create be "legal," while money anyone else produces, counterfeit?
"The Congress shall have Power To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court…"
The supreme court is that which created this Universe, not some man-made group of pasty-white psychopaths wearing stupid wigs.
"The Congress shall have Power To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia […]."
The government has just given itself the right to organize a group of people to fight other people — our own species — because they live far away, have a different skin color, and/or speak a different language?!
"The Congress shall have Power To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department of Office thereof."
Translation: The government has granted itself the power to carry out the threats it forcing upon you, so their enslaving document is perpetually adhered to, and none of you sheep escape the pen.
"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
You've granted me the "privilege" to a trial in one of your courts, should I not conform to a threat you created and levied on me?! Adhering to a strict regimen of Orson Welles' Six-Pack Abs is more insane!
"No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time."
You make the laws; you make the money, and this is all done in secret? Then you expect us to believe you'll provide an accurate account of your expenditures?!
"Ice pick lobotomies! Get your free ice pick lobotomies here!"
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States…"
Except, of course, fucking president!
Are plumbers chauffeured around in limos? Do TV repairmen have entire jet planes at their disposal? When was the last time you were aware of high school janitors being able to take multi-million dollar vacations on the public's dime? What about being president doesn't scream of nobility?! The fact you're not referred to as a king?
"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay Duty on Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State [...]"
Doesn't the above wreak of the Ten Commandments? Don't worship others, show allegiance to me, etc. It's a plausible conclusion both were written by scared entities, fearful they'll be usurped of "powers" they've granted themselves.
"ARTICLE II
Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."
If a democracy is a government by the people, why does one person have paramount power here?
"The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately [choose] by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner [choose] the President. But in choosing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representatives from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there shall remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall [choose] from them by Ballot the Vice President."
First off, what the fuck—?! An infant's initial babbling is easier to understand.
Secondly, a secret ballot is more easily rigged than a card game in which you provide the cards, and none of the other players are allowed to see the hands they're dealt.
Third, where is the populace represented in the above?
"Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: — 'I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.' "
"He," as in a male, will protect and defend the Constitution — which only protects and defends the rich, ruling slave owners who wrote said document.
"[H]e [the President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
Translation: El Presidente will make damned sure the threats levied upon us by the rich slave owners are carried out.
"ARTICLE III
Section 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."
The people aren't allowed to levy the verdict?
"The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained."
The people can't determine who's treasonous? I thought this was a government by the people.
"ARTICLE IV
Section 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States."
"Privileges" bequeathed by the rich slave owners, but "privileges" we already had, prior to the implementation of government.
"Section 3. New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."
Translation: You're free and autonomous…as long we allow you to be.
"The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needed Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State."
"Property"? Whatever created this Universe owns everything in it. Neither we, nor the United States — the latter of which doesn't exist — own anything.
"ARTICLE VII
The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.
Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth IN WITNESS whereof We have hereunto subscribed our names,"
Were the people present for, or involved in, this ratification?
"That the Electors should meet on the Day fixed for the Election of the President, and should transmit their Votes certified, signed, sealed and directed, as the Constitution requires, to the Secretary of the United States in Congress assembled, that the Senators and Representatives should convene at the Time and Place assigned; that the Senators should appoint a President of the Senate, for the sole Purpose of receiving, opening and counting the Votes for President; and, that after he shall be chosen, the Congress, together with the President, should, without Delay, proceed to execute the Constitution."
Election by secret ballot, that's tabulated by individuals appointed by the slave owners. How fuckin' weak a foundation are you prepared to build your house on? An active mudslide, on top of a pit of quicksand, with just enough plutonium-239 to poison the fuck out of you, whilst drinking from a mercury-filled stream nearby, during construction?
For the sake of brevity, numerous depraved passages from the U.S. Constitution were omitted from the above. Suffice it to say, this document — many of us hold sacred — is the same thing a Mafia enforcer tells a small shop owner: "I make the rules, and you comply. If you don't, I'll destroy you."
Sources:
Books:
Spooner, Lysander. (1870). No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. Free Patriot Press. ISBN: 9781938357008
Online Sources:
No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority:
The preceding blog was written by Hugh Mungus. Feel free to contact the author directly here on Steemit, or via his personal E-mail address: [email protected]