Indeed but exactly what is the error though, what proposition is made or simply suggested that pegs such a gambit/tactic/operation as fallacious, because to me it seems like a complete 180 of a fallacy: a truth - breaking apart opposition in order to conquer it in parts instead of whole, which arguably is a sound way of thinking should it be about conquering adversaries or adversity.
Indeed but exactly what is the error though, what proposition is made or simply suggested that pegs such a gambit/tactic/operation as fallacious, because to me it seems like a complete 180 of a fallacy: a truth - breaking apart opposition in order to conquer it in parts instead of whole, which arguably is a sound way of thinking should it be about conquering adversaries or adversity.