Capitalism, Harvard And Goldman Sachs

in #life6 years ago

"I am a critic of Capitalism. I don't like it, I don't think it works real well and I think the human race can do a lot better. Is that clear?"


800px-Longfellow_Hall,_Harvard_University,_Cambridge_MA.jpg
Longfellow Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge MA
source: Wikipedia


Those are the opening words of a lecture by Richard D. Wolff from 2017 with the title "Capitalism Has Failed". If you've read some of my posts, you'll know that this man has been a great source of information to me. Unlike myself, mr. Wolff did finish his education and did so at the most famous schools in the world: Harvard, Yale and Stanford universities. The funny thing is that, while these most elite educational institutes are designed te deliver the next generation of political leaders and captains of industry, he turned out an outspoken Marxist.

Now, I won't go on an in-depth critique of capitalism this time, but I'd like to share some of Richard Wolffs experiences to illustrate how deeply sick the current state of the world economy, and how capitalism is responsible for that, or rather how our unshakable belief in the market-economy is responsible.

From his introduction at Harvard University he tells about the speech from the director to the assembled freshmen of his first year, at 17.5 years of age. The director asked the attendants to look at the person to your right, and then at the person to your left. He then said to realize that one of them will become a next captain of industry and the other will become a future political leader, the next president maybe. "Here at Harvard we do not educate you, but we are preparing you to run the world."

He also said that at Yale one of his classmates was a woman named Janet Yellen, the former chair of the Federal Reserve; it's clear that these universities are meant to teach anything but Marxism, and they indeed don't. Another thing I heard from mr. Wolff, in another talk, is that taking economy class essentially meant taking capitalism class: other economic models are mentioned in the sidelines, as failed experiments in the past, as examples of how not to organize an economy.


Richard_D._Wolff_in_2015.jpg
Richard D. Wolff in 2015 - source: Wikimedia Commons

I can't verify any of these anecdotes of course, but I have heard similar stories by other people who attended these institutions; they really seem to act as the breeding ground for the next generations of our leaders. If so, it would be only natural that the things taught there would be the things necessary for keeping the (belief in the) current order of things intact. Marxism doesn't fit that bill. And that's because Marx and Engels wrote the best criticism on industrial capitalism as they saw it emerge around them. And that's all they did: they admired the system greatly for it's ability to accelerate the process of creating material wealth and comfort, but also saw the fatal flaws inherent in a system in which laborers would be alienated from the capital and eventually even the work itself. They foresaw the crisis of overproduction we are in the middle of right now, as well as the inherent instability that we now experience every 4 to 7 years, the frequency in which small and large "downturns" happen.

Wolff said often that every American President since F.D.R. made the same promise, could make the same promise because of this boom-bust-cycle; "if you vote for me and follow my plans, I promise to get us out of the current economic downturn". So left and right, liberal and conservative, Republican and Democrat, they all devise their own narratives about how we got here and how we get out of here. But it's all fake.

Back to Harvard; very recently he talked about a disturbing development concerning Harvard and Goldman Sachs. Harvard University's president, Drew Faust joined the board of Goldman Sachs, only a couple of days after she resigned as president of Harvard. She receives an initial one time payment of $500,000 .00 plus an annual retainer of $75,000.00, for which she has to attend a couple of board-meetings. Wikipedia proves to be very up-to-date in this case:

Faust retired as President of Harvard College in June 2018, succeeded by Lawrence Bacow. Just four days after retiring from her position as president, she joined the board of Goldman Sachs. She retains her title as a professor of History at Harvard.

Wolff goes on to explain how the University of Harvard screws the common people of Massachusetts, and how the rich use the university as a large post for tax deduction. They donate billions to the educational institute, money they would otherwise have to pay taxes on. Wolff then makes the connection on how this mechanism hinders the political process to raise the minimum wage in the state. If you have some time left, I'd invite you to listen to this speech; it's good and eye-opening to see how deep the mechanisms to protect the status quo are rooted in society and to see it illustrated by current events. It starts with the Harvard memories and the specifics about the Drew Faust promotion to the board of Goldman Sachs, but the rest is pretty interesting to.


Global Capitalism: Immigration & Trade War [July 2018]

This video is part of the Democracy At Work YouTube channel, where Richard Wolff releases many videos on the current state of the economy as seen fom a Marxist viewpoint. I'm not a Marxist as none of the "isms" are all right and none of them are all wrong. But these times call for a serious and critical look at the market economy that's clearly failing.


wave-13 divider odrau steem

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>Why Consciousness Exists
Godless Morality: A Short Reflection On Our Fading Moral SkillsHonest Ads?
Screwing The CustomerAkira's 30th Birthday
NothingEOS Games: One Way To Mass Adoption

wave-13 divider odrau steem
Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!
Helpienaut_post_banner_02-01.png

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented. If you would like to be scouted for @helpie , please drop a comment on THIS POST or contact @paintingangels on discord at paintingangels(serena)#3668.

wave-13 divider odrau steem
Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:

Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO

Sort:  

It is a contradiction to claim that someone went to all the right schools where they teach nothing but capitalism, which they don't. In order to have a capitalist system one has to have a free market. Never have had that all through history.

What they are teaching is confusion and feudalism. That is and always has been what capitalism is without a free market. This is the ole trick of renaming a thing so that people don't recognize it.

Thanks for the support and the comment, @commonlaw, I appreciate that a lot :-)

That is and always has been what capitalism is without a free market.

So, what does a "free market" look like? And can you point to any time in human history in which markets have been "free"? I have to agree with @k9disc; a "free market" is a contradiction in terms. It cannot exist. The simplest way to understand why markets can never be free and have never been free, is to define for yourself the term "ownership". How do we determine what's mine and what's yours?

What you describe is a plutocracy, which is the end result of all capitalist experiments throughout our history. The crony capitalism @lucylin mentions is the practice of the highly mutilated capitalist ideology, just as communism is the practice of the highly mutilated Marxist ideology.

Well said.

I've never had a an argument with a marxist who recognizes (or refuses to recognize) the difference between capitalism and crony capitalism.

To do so would blow all models out of the water, and even more - the self realization that they are, actually, control freaks! lol

Low IQ arguments are the only ones they can make.

Like it or not, markets are governed and regulated by man. Someone will always be "the crony", be it the worker, the manager, or the owner. "Someone" will always be structurally weak or strong.

I think the same kind of ideological myopathy happens with proponents of lassiez faire in regards to a properly "free" market.

It doesn't exist, and cannot exist, as it is a construct and institution of man.

like it or not, markets are governed and regulated by man.

No they are regulated by supply, demand and scarcity - whether you like it or not.
The tr to be governed by the narcissist believes otherwise.

"Someone" will always be structurally weak or strong.

Correct, but conflating 'crony' to this dynamic (in context of crony capitalism is incorrect.
'Crony' in this context refers to corruption, price fixing etc.

I think the same kind of ideological myopathy happens with proponents of lassiez faire in regards to a properly "free" market.

Free market capitalism occurred naturally - 'you scratch my back I'll scratch yours.'
It is not an ideology. It is a natural system.

It doesn't exist, and cannot exist, as it is a construct and institution of man.

No it's not.
Ask the ant and the aphid..is that a construct of man also?
It is a dynamic present throughout nature..

Thinking of capitalism in money terms is myopic.

Money and markets are man made, artificial constructs dependent upon the whims, fears, and feelings of man and the mob. To cite the "free market" as some kind of natural law is absurd. Money and markets are of man, for man, and by man, and as such go well beyond the laws of nature.

And notice that I accept the distinction between crony capitalism and capitalism. I just understand that capitalism requires rules and those rules are written and interpreted by men with all of our hopes, fears, feelings, and future wrapped up in it.

Like a natural system of water rights. Or a natural system of real estate. Absurd.

Money and markets are man made

Money is, markets aren't. The sexual market in every sexually reproducing species, for example?

Money and markets

Conflating the two is absurd, as a principle.
Have you never swapped anything? lol

Money and markets are of man, for man, and by man, and as such go well beyond the laws of nature.

Philosophically speaking, you are delineating 'man' from nature? How does that work? That's absurd, mate
Philosophically speaking - if we are a part of nature , then there isn't a single thing that we can ever do that is not an extension of that same nature.
Ergo it does not go beyond the laws of nature.
That's philosophically impossible.

just sayin'...

Conflating water rights with property rights is absurd.
You don't believe in property rights?
Is your body not your property?

If you don't believe in property rights, but you keep your own wealth, that's either just hypocritical or you don't really believe that to be true...

???

I believe that property rights, like water rights, money and markets, are concepts created and negotiated by men. The end.

Those concepts do not function under any kind of "natural law" because they are governed by the rules of men.

The only time the rules and concepts of men can be boiled down to natural law is when might makes right.

I believe that property rights, like water rights, money and markets, are concepts created and negotiated by men. The end.

No not the end...far from.

Does a lion have property rights with its territory?
Or ants with their nest...

Hardly man made...?

Animal borders...mmmmm..the construct argument fall apart there a little..?

Those concepts do not function under any kind of "natural law" because they are governed by the rules of men.

So you are positing that humans are not natural?
Anything that is a product of nature, is by definition, also a product of nature.

How separate do you see our biological units different than other animal. Why separate?

If you don't believe property is real, send me your steem- none of it's real, right?

Or it's not real but you compromise your principles and whore your soul within the system?

If you don't believe in property rights (starting with the self), you have no problems with your wife/daughter husband or son, being sexually assaulted? - there is no natural property, it's just a construct, right?

I'll wait for your steem.....cheers! lol

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 10

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 64761.00
ETH 3425.94
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.55