In contrast to the staircase as opposed to Newton,

In contrast to the staircase as opposed to Newton, he believes that space and time are our subjective way to order this manifold that comes to us from without and from within. This means that I have a simple and time at least in the form in which we can talk about human space and time it does not exist It would seem like some monstrous mouse that even includes us, perhaps, by the natural sciences Your time was not friends but it was not so much more than that we can say One of Kant's early works of 1755 Well, like Id The real work is devoted precisely to the problem of the origin of Xylenus, the universal natural history and the theory of the sky so-so that has left an indubitable mark in the history of natural science. Well, Kant speaks according to our human knowledge. And it is of fundamental importance for him to show that our way of knowing essentially determines the results of this knowledge in this, strictly speaking and his papernik consists therefore of reasoning about objects. Since if they existed and were known to us outside our way of knowing, Kant does not give us. And by the way, we can say ska It's very difficult to return to this conclusion with a statement of the critic of pure reason, but it seems very difficult to me. How to return this conclusion only which makes the question of criticism of pure reason from this point of view of existence not in the oath of geometry Speaks absolutely of another Call to make and the thing suggests he will remain in the correspondence pure reason Kant does not talk about what kind of theoretical constructions we can create to think and to know an object that is not the same thing we can do with anything but with it, so that we know our thoughts must correspond. What is called Zerzaliya