You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The problem with being human and the brain bottleneck in leadership
Another argument for having AIs to be unbiased leaders who take care about the well-being of us. At least better than the politicians we have right now. Just who will set the rules, how far they can go in protecting us, if we are the worst enemy for our own environment?
Probably better to stick with the flawed brains, and just more often replace them (before damage occurs).
AI doesn't have to be the leader. AI just has to be a better calculator. The humans can be the leaders and have improved leadership capacity due to AI.
Replacing flawed brains means limited ability to lead. Can a human brain process the wants and needs of 10 million people? How about 1 billion people? It will never scale no matter how often you replace one limited brain with another. Better ability to process information means better ability to make complex wise ethical decisions.
then it is not AI... sorry. The Hive Mind will not be our friend
I blog about the AI conflict and its silent assimilation... the human brain has flawed when the environment is coercive only.