Genetic Engineering: How Would You Modify Your 'Ideal' Child If You Could Change Its DNA?

in #life7 years ago



Soon, we will be able to genetically modify our children and eventually even ourselves.

I've already written several posts about CRISPR Cas9, the gene editing method that will allow us to change parts of our DNA, therefore changing specific features about our body our personality as well.

With the innovation of CRIPSR came many ethical questions - are we going to have genetically modified "designer babies" in the future, who are all good-looking and talented in every way?!

We don't know if that will happen anytime soon, but still it's an interesting thought experiment.
1,000 participants (500 from the US, 500 from Europe) participated in an Online Survey to answer questions about exactly this scenario:

What would you change about your baby if anything was possible?

Here are the answers!

img


Differences between Europeans and US-Americans

- Personality Traits -

First, let's look at how Europeans and Americans would design their perfect baby's personality traits.
For both, Intelligence is the most important factor (half of the votes!), closely followed by creativity. It's interesting to note how highly creativity is ranked compared to the other traits!
Next, Americans would want their kids to be kind and then charismatic, while Europeans are tied between courage and kindness. Courage isn't even considered by Americans.
On 5th place, we have charismatic on the European side and independent on the American side. Again, interesting to note how "independent" isn't even on the list for Europeans, but seems to be quite important for Americans.
This is a strong signal for the US' individual culture, which (contrary to Asian cultures for example) focuses on the individual and achieving things by yourself.

img


- Physical Traits -

When regarding physical traits, both nations voted in quite a similar way.
They both prioritized health with about half of the total votes.
Next is a tie between weight and attractiveness - 13% of both Europeans and Americans voted for that.
Athletic ability is preferred by Americans (9% compared to 6%), and the last factor is height, which was also more important for Americans.

As for the physical appearance, Europeans were voting for a blonde, blue-eyed girl that's slightly taller than average.
US-Americans preferred black hair and blue eyes in a boy, and also slightly taller than average height.

img


Now we know how the different people in Europe or the US would genetically engineer their baby.

But what about the different choices amongst men and women? Does a certain gender prefer certain attributes?


Differences between men's and women's choices

- Personality Traits -

The top 3 most voted personality traits were the same for both men and women: intelligence, creativity and kindness.
Around half of the total votes were regarding intelligence, followed by creativity with 15-16% and kindness with 9-11%.
9% of men voted for courage as a personality trait, and 6% for charisma.
The women's votes were tied between charisma and independence, both with 7%.
It's interesting to note that "independence" was only voted by women, and wasn't even mentioned in the men'S voting ranking!
"Courage" on the other hand is an attribute that only men voted for!

img


- Physical Traits -

When looking at men's and women's votes for physical traits, almost half of all the votes were once again for health. But there's a 9% difference between men's (46%) and women's votes (55%).
Both men and women are almost tied for the next 2 physical traits, 14% of women and 15% of men voted for weight, and 11% of women and 12% of men voted for attractiveness. (Surprising, 1% more male votes for attractiveness!)
1 in 10 men voted for athletic ability - and NO woman did! 0% ! That's such an interesting fact which tells us so much about gender roles and stereotypes.
While 5% of women and 8% of men voted for height, only 5% of women and 0% of men were interested in changing their kids' eye colour.

Women would ideally give their daughters black hair and blue eyes, with an above average height.
Men were in favor of a blond-haired, blue-eyed son, with only 50% of votes for an above average height.

img


Conclusion

In conclusion, intelligence and health were the most desired by all participants - Americans, Europeans, Women and Men.
When looking at physical traits, it's interesting to note that men and women from both Europe and the US voted in quite a similar way.

The differences were according to the participant's gender, rather than his culture.

Male voters were slightly more concerned with attractiveness and weight than women, and women on the other hand were not interested in athletic ability at all.

As for the character traits, creativity is ranked very highly after intelligence.
While Europeans and men in general consider courage to be important, Americans and women didn't vote for it at all.
"Independence" on the other hand was only voted for by Americans, not Europeans.

These statistics can tell us so much about the different cultures and different genders - and it shows how beauty standards and stereotypes influence us!




Images: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4



Want to get featured on my blog? Register for Steemit Promo

- Instagram -

- Steemit FB Group - 


© Sirwinchester


Sort:  

This has already started to happen to some respect for the wealthy. There was a professional basketball player named Carlos Boozer who was able to cure his kids sickle cell anemia with the stem cells of his other twins which the produced in a lab and then chose the ones that weren't going to have sickle cell anemia. It was crazy.

If I understand what you're saying, these pre-birth triplets? Since they weren't born yet, they could choose which ones lived and died from the sickle cell anemia? Jeezz... That's crazy.

One was born with it and was alive for 2 years. Then they took and fertilized eggs in a lab environment and got 7 potential offspring but then kept two of them that were healthy. They put those in the mother and then she had those and they kept stem cells from the new twins to cure the kid that was a couple years old. It was nuts. It was experimental and cost millions of dollars.

AMAZING! Thanks for elaborating.

Yeah I was blown away when I saw a documentary about it.

WOW! That's even crazier than I thought. That is some next level stuff. I'm not even sure how I feel. Happy they cured the living baby or horrified so many needed to die?

Yeah it is pretty trippy because they threw the other embryos away because they had sickle cell anemia.

great!

Since they now believe that 1 in 2 people will get some form of cancer in their lifetime, I'd put health as number 1.

Without your health, the rest don't seem to matter.

IMHO

I agree. The only thing I would change are things that I would try to change post birth anyway -- all health related.

ITS THE FURTURE

I don't know with you people
but I'm really against the idea of us playing God

Why? Somebody has to...

Cg

Personally, I think designer babies are unnecessary and unethical. Babies are neither pets nor the avatars in our games. Genetics modification on babies should be restricted to only health-related issues. It is fascinating how fast science is progressing. In fact, I just made a post on achieving human immortality through science. Perhaps the readers here might find it interesting as well. Here is the link: https://steemit.com/life/@bba/eternal-life-vs-eternal-youth-if-you-have-to-choose-what-would-it-be

that's a crazy topic! expecially with the new technologies coming up with CRISPR!

Yeah, let's face it, hereditary disease would be a number one thing to wipe out. Then I'd give her perfect sight, and the lobster gene that would allow her to live as long as she wants in perfect health.

The rest I'd leave up to nature and nurture :-)

Cg

Welcome to the future... Steem On!!!

That's actually really neat!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.12
JST 0.027
BTC 60231.85
ETH 3263.34
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43