Sort:  

I believe I answered the original question though an yes, it is scary stuff.

Scarier is that most of the upvotes I have gotten are from accounts that appear either fake or propagandists. Very few real people detected. Which is to say, by writing these although I have earned a little, I have attracted a lot more negative attention from the bad guys.

Here is a question for you - how do you determine if someones ultimate goal is to further the deep state or to get rich and boost their own ego?

This is maybe the most difficult question, how do you tell in a super complex environment like this who you can trust.

First, I spend most of my time with my most trusted sources. That way when something is not trustworth, it will always have a way of staying out.

Second, I have my own personal list of questions and priorities, and my trusted sources list of questions and priorities. Untrustworthy sources have completely wrong priorities, they are trying to throw you off. (id someone who is still more concerned with hillary than trump, or who is obsessed with disproving the dnc hack)

Third, I directly put the question to the people and see how they respond. If they ignore all my questions and attack me personally, that is a dead giveaway.

Fourth, actual journalists don't appear out of nowhere, they have been writing for a long time and have been on record somewhere. Suzie3d and Elizabeteh Lea Vos appeared completely out of nowhere in 2017, then were hyped as big time new voices on steemit by v4 and that entire gang. When I couldn't even get a resteem, very suspicious.

Disobedient media, the conscious resistance and the activist post fails all these tests. Then once I have a list of known disinfo, anyone who won't even consider the concerns I have about them or who outright attacks me for asking questions, they just get added to the list.

Last year I noticed a huge spike in the number of popup sites that had no history and seemed to have 75% reposts of known stuff and then 25% stuff that was propaganda.

I write about this in privacy workshop, as having good sources is required for privacy, otherwise you are inviting surveillance and liars into your head. I go into my reasoning extensively and in the posts where I actually call out disobedient and TCR, i go into a lot of detail about how they actually responded to basic questions.

I guess I could summarize them also as not having an open attitude, and journalists and writers should be generally open to questions and ideas.

That entire group was completely manipulative in every way, everything is sketchy, like parts are missing from who these people are. You may not see my face on steemit but you will get from my writing a very, very clear picture of what is going on with me I believe. And if you compare that to the entire collection of work from those sources, it will clearly stand out I believe.

I guess I could say also, disinformation agents besides always personally attacking those who dare question them, and having a bad attitude, and resteeming the same crap together to push a daily agenda, not a single one of them even considered a single post on my blog after I started asking questions.

I spent a ton of time looking into what they wrote, trying to get their story, who they were, and they show not a single sign of considering anything I've written. So, a remarkable incuriosity and refusal to consider anything outside of their own agenda stands out.

And in general, their posts and their conspiracy 'research' is impotent. Their writing is uncompelling, bad even. They call themselves investigators but only investigate things that are already in the public domain.

@dbroze is a perfect example, he has like 30 posts on activistpost and not a single new piece of information, it is all just rehashing.

Also, they claim to be anarchists but show neither sign of understanding the theory, or acting out any practical aspects.

They also write about things I know to be cop operations like the rainbow gathering, but don't mention any undercover cops.

So it's clear to me at least that TCR/Kenny simply go to rainbow gatherings in the summer and anarchulpulco in the winter and just surveil everything from the inside. I know those two are cops, what is surprising to me is how they are so well intertwined with russian disinfo, it makes me wonder if it's the fbi/cia are using them to support trump.

One does not have to know exactly who someone is to know they can't be trusted as a source, or friend.

Hope this helps. I write more about it in the Truth Now vs Truth Never post. Sure we don't want to be divided but we don't want to be infiltrated by obvious agents either. Living with a spy is hardly privacy. If you read my back blogs, I know from experience, I had a lover that was one of them and my best friend was one of them. That was back when I was of that school where 'it's bad form to be suspicious all the time, just chill'

Not anymore.

There are many ways to identify shills, controlled op or deceived people (yes some are just deceived and not shills). One of the quickest ways I've found (though it is not absolutely foolproof) is when a person will not discuss these 3 topics.

  1. 9/11 was a Mossad/CIA operation as is the 'War on Terror'.
  2. Central bankers control the world eg Rothschilds
  3. Zionism is the #1 problem in the world today

I've yet to see Assange, Snowden, Putin, Trump, Ron Paul or any other leader state these facts. Shills like Alex Jones speak about 1 & 2 but not 3. That does not mean that anyone not talking of all 3 is a shill, they may just know that it would be career (or literal) suicide to do so which keeps them muzzled - they may also be deceived.

When you see someone speak of ALL 3 you tend to move them a little further up the 'trust scale' but truth be told, you shouldn't trust anyone 100%.

i agree, people like noam chomsky or amy goodman put out a lot of good information but it is clear that their jobs depend on them maintaining a line.

you can see it pretty clearly, the deep state is a term i've been using for around 10 years, but now it's a term everyone uses.

check out my privacy workshop when you get a chance. /u/mindhawk on reddit has all of my attempt to discuss zionism on a zionist run platform, all my controversial posts over 6 years were obvious statements of fact about the concentration camp they have turned palestine into and how they illegally control the united states congress.

im going to post soon about the global debt spike that's underway in a pictoral exploration.

i agree though, anyone who refuses to acknowledge these three things will never be 100% trusted as a source.

I just had a quick look at dbroze and he seems to be posting about two posts a day of often interesting content - how does his posting a wide range of content including health and personal issues further an agenda? (I'm still trying to work out what the agenda is)

http://theconsciousresistance.com/2018/01/stop-calling-skinny-dealing-body-issues-man/

And when you say "cop" I think fat moronic American law enforcement agent - these people, if they are doing what you are suggesting, are beyond cunning - what do you mean by cop?

I'm very curious to hear your take on this:

https://steemit.com/life/@suzi3d/why-i-have-gone-silent

suzie is overdramaticizing her entire story, and it's a shaggy dog story, none of her details makes any sense. she is playing a victim and casting a bunch of suspicions all over without any details.

everything i say about her i document in my post, her entire story about why she needs asylum doesn't make any sense at all.

dbroze sets himself up as a spiritual leader of a cult like anarchist movement and then writes like is a teenage girl. his 'books' are weak, they don't say anything interesting or compelling, it's bad writing. look at all of his activist post articles, he just reports on what other people report on and interviews people to gain credibility from their vicinity.

FBI agents are not fat cops, they are ex military, they are brighter, they have degrees, and they work long term cons to infiltrate any and all movements like anarchy or the peace movements.

i write extensively in privacy workshop with links to movements like earth first who have had experience with this for a long time and people have gone to prison for years.

ask suzie yourself to tell you exactly how she was being harassed in new zealand, she refused to give me a single detail and the links she sent me to interviews about it were dead, and she never addressed that like 'oh sorry those links were dead, her is where they are now', no it was like it didn't happen and she just called me names.

New to Steemit?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.25
JST 0.038
BTC 104977.10
ETH 3338.75
SBD 4.34