Should everybody be allowed to have as much children as they want
Another difficult question
Should society allow everybody to reproduce unlimited ?
I see some Pro's and Con's
Pro
- Reproducing is a natural urge and difficult to contain
- New generation will support older
- It is bringing meaning to people's life
- It allows our kind to evolve. Is this still happening :-) ?
Con
- World is getting overpopulated !!!
- Some cultures that promote having lots of children will start dominating the world
- It costs money to society
- It is proven that less educated people have more children therefore we could assume a negative impact on society in the long run
If we want to mitigate what could we do
- Limit the amount of children per couple
- Stop incentives to promote having lots of children
- Limit the amount related to proven capacity to support them
- Forbid some people to have children. Difficult one but could be beneficial in theory
- Invade some planets :-)
But giving life to somebody ia a holy thing. I think we should have as much as children as we can but we made a lot of unnecesary needs that are stoping as from having a lot of children
But the world is getting too crowded. Isn't it better to find a peace full solution to this early on ?
On this red areai lives more people that in blue
You highlighted Bangladesh right ? Don't you mean India because I think Russia has a bigger population that Bangladesh
Nonetheless I agree there are very crowded places on earth. But in my opinion it will start getting like this everywhere.
It's a simple numbers game...
Interesting topic. You make some good points. I find a couple that I do not necessarily agree. For example, "the world is overpopulated". I'm not so sure. Flying over most of the USA or Canada there is a lot of empty space. It is not built up today, but certainly if places become too crowded people can migrate to lots of virgin territory. The overpopulation myth seems to focus solely on cities.
I do agree on the very important point of education (and by extension, standard of living) and birth rates. The higher the standard of living, the less children people have. Typically children were had due to the boost in labor. Nowadays it is for different reasons (in the West).
I would argue against using force to limit the number of children people have as this is immoral. Any initiation of force is immoral. However, your second point hints at a solution. By removing the welfare state, there is no benefit to people having children for the sake of an income. If, on the other hand, we work towards improving education and raise standards of living, then the birth rate will naturally decrease.
One thing to note, though, is that if birth rates fall too dramatically, this signals a death spiral for a given society. That is, less newborns to replace an ageing population. Japan is an example of this. So we really should be careful what we wish for. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for your good reply
I agree there are still relatively empty spaces in the world. But there are also reasons for that : deserts, mountains or other less favourable locations. But space is not the only thing : we need to feed all those people and I'm not sure if that is sustainable. But I agree it's not a critical issue right now
Agreed also on the immoral part. The welfare state I'm not so sure. Some people will still just have the children and don't think about consequences. They know we will not let them die...
Indeed of there are too many grey people supported by new blood there is indeed another issue. Maybe we should reform social security into a individual supporting system to mitigate.