Scientific Inquisition ... Answers to Stephen Hawking
Scientific Inquisition ... Answers to Stephen Hawking
In recent years many scientists have been propagating their ideal atheist and have gone further, saying that after death there is nothing ... One thing is not to believe in the existence of God other is that they dare to go beyond and to say that miracles are not compatible with science and to say that after death there is nothing afterlife ... Arrogance and fame have made them forget many scientific principles, laws of physics and documented historical facts ... Here the scientific arguments
"What I meant when I said that we would know 'the mind of God' was that we would understand everything that God would be able to understand if it existed. But there is no God. I'm an atheist. Religion believes in miracles, but these are not compatible with science. " Stephen Hawking
It would have been convenient for the scientist to explain the Miracle of the Sun of the Virgin of Fatima ... How is it that a 6-year-old peasant girl could predict with zero margin of error in date and time a physical, climate and visual event with an estimated 70,000 witnesses including numerous newspapers, additional that there are photographs of the fact ... Is this what he calls miracles are not compatible with science? Nor with the use of satellites today can a child and peasant step to make such a prediction ... I am depriving all the religious importance to the fact to speak from the purely scientific point of view ... The Sun literally moved in circles.
! [img_6.jpg] (
)
! [Actualidad_208490063_32659810_1024x576.jpg] (
)
! [images.jpg] (
)
! [cova_da_iria.jpg] (
)
"I think of the brain as a computer, that it will stop working when its components fail, there is no posvida or a paradise for broken computers, that is a fairy tale for people who fear darkness." Stephen Hawking
A very simplistic vision of energy, without energy we did not have life, the fundamental basis of string theory lies in the existence of several dimensions and several parallel universes ...
Laws of physics:
1- Law of the force of gravity of Isaac Newton: P = M. G ....
2- Law of relativity E = M .C2
3- Principle of energy conservation. Energy neither creates nor destroys, only transforms you ... When do you die that happens with that energy? or that spirit?
Four . String theory: The scientific theory of the strings supports the existence of up to 10 dimensions to explain the matter, if we apply quantum physics to all of the above, the result is the existence of parallel universes or multi universes.
This has got to be absolute nonsense.
Otherwise, the whole world would be creming themselves. Which they're not. So, good luck with Darwin maybe? Should you accept the challenge.
How about... When you turn off a light, does the lightbulb go to heaven?
(They're the same ballpark, are they not? I think we all know the answer to my particular riddle.)
When you turn off the light bulb, you are no longer passing energy to a body ... But the energy that you did not let go did not disappear or did it?
How I see it: Kinetic energy powered the light bulb whilst it was switched on. Obeying all the laws of physics, the lightbulb converted this kinetic energy to light and heat. On switching the light off, the light stopped drawing electricity from the mains.
When you die, the 'light' that is your mind is no longer being produced as you are brain dead. Whilst alive, your brain requires nutrients and oxygen just like the rest of your body for respiration. To enable the brain to function exactly as it does. A dead brain will no longer require such nutrients so the body energy reserves (eg. fat deposits) will then simply remain until they have rotted away.
That is correct, what I mean is that you are not a body, you are that source of energy ... If the body to which you give energy no longer works, the source of energy also ends? Physically that is not correct ... If you have a source of energy directly linked to only one element and that element is turned off, the energy is still there, if you apply the quantum theory, the principle of the strings you will realize that physically and scientifically energy could pass to a parallel universe or another dimension ... Another thing is the degree of consciousness that you have at that moment.
What does cremation have to do with energy? if when you die and your energy is transformed into something else or passes to a parallel universe or another dimension ... All the above is based on the theory of strings and quantum physics, so I do not understand what is silly. In fact, the theory of the strings speaks of 10 dimensions ...
Creming oneself has nothing to do with cremation. Lol! I have to apologise but I just don't think what you've written answers anything a genius like Hawking ever wrote. Maybe I just couldn't understand what you wrote?
When you die, your energy DOES NOT pass into a parallel universe or another dimension or anything else for that matter. It stays in your body. Being dead, you stop using it yourself just as you also stop further calorific intake (as you're no longer eating). But all your fat / protein / carbohydrate deposits in your body remain exactly where they are until your body decomposes fully and the putrefying bacteria have broken it all down.
Is this not obvious?
In fact, for your information, he concludes that God does not exist by the theory of the ropes, when they could demonstrate firing a beam of electrons against a metal plate that the other On the side of the plate electrons were fired, hence the conclusion of the quantum physics that existed physically but at the atomic level, that is, we tied them traveling between the parallel universes through something that he called tubes ... From there is born the quantum mechanics that would disintegrate an object into electrons and send it through these tubes and rebuild it again ... In any case I see that your answers are based on the chemical and medical point of view and do not touch on any comments none of the theories of physics that the same genius used .... I also see that he is silent about the comment that miracles are not compatible with science, there are many cases that I have read that the same science catalogs like
It can not be explained by scienceThat is inquisition, but can you explain it to you does not exist the fact? It is the same of the religious inquisition, what religion could not explain what was classified as heresy.Hawking was a genius if ... But I'm simply basing myself on real facts that he himself defended and proposed at different times ... But at the end of his years I do not know if by age he began to say things that in my opinion contradict those principles or the alter ego made him want to challenge.
I think there's something of a language barrier and my understanding of theoretical physics theory is probably nowhere near your level. That said, could you define the word miracle for me please? Because my understanding of it is that it is something that can't be explained by nature or science. So, they're an illusion, a metaphor? They're certainly not concrete. For anything and everything that exists or will come to exist can be be explained by nature or science. There's no real bona fide magic in this universe.
Not understanding how something happens hardly makes something a 'miracle'. After all, to play on the phrase, one man's meat is another man's poison, how about:
One man's miracle is another man's 5- minute bedtime puzzle?
I can understand certain things but if I'd tried explaining them to my dear old mother before she passed on I'd have been banging my head against a wall as she failed to grasp even the basics.
So what is a miracle? Can you give me one? How about a dozen? It's just a weasel word with no real value to it as far as I'm concerned. Often used by religious people to justify all their deceit.
As a fan of Liverpool football club, I often hear of the Miracle of Istanbul. 2005, a particularly average Liverpool side reached the final of the Champions League in football (soccer). They faced one of the two teams with a greater history than them: AC Milan. Milan scored 3 in the first 45 minutes.
It looked to be over.
Liverpool stormed back in the second half scoring three goals themselves. Extra-time saw the Liverpool goalkeeper do an amazing double save from the great Shevchenko. On penalties, Shevchenko failed to score the very last spot kick so Liverpool were crowned champions.
It's the greatest comeback in any football final, arguably. With more drama than most I'd say.
Did god really intervene that night? How about the butterfly effect / chaos theory?
Or did they just get lucky by making their own luck? (If you give up and start crying too easily, you don't tend to win much.)
What do you reckon?
We have in common that we are followers of Liverpool ... That feat was made last year in Eufa against Sevilla, by the hand of Kloop ... Well that is not a miracle because it is within the statistical and scientific explanations.