Universal Basic Income Is A Control Mechanism

At initial face value, universal basic income sounds like a good idea, a way to equalize opportunities for all. I believe it would destroy for many their own ability to grow and become as good as they can be because it squashes incentive to learn and work hard before those qualities are able to take root in a growing person. It would also take away the very thing they think they would be getting, real freedom. By guaranteeing a certain amount of income, I guarantee a large percentage of people will become slaves to the system. This is of course the goal of the elites as slaves are easily controlled. People that are in need of real help I am not blind to , but they fall into a different category than this one size free money for all no matter the situation.

The problem for the masses is the large multinational corporations have too much power over the people already. The elites pull the rug out from under everyone by moving factories and jobs from one country to another while simultaneously debasing the purchasing power of the local currency. This problem is not isolated to just the United States either, they have become equally adept at screwing people in any country of origin. There is always some place with a better exchange rate, cheaper labor, more favorable tax codes and a fresher supply of workers available to move to.

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, one of the elitists referenced, states that meaningful roles will be created for the benefactors of this income in his recent speech at Harvard. http://blogs.plos.org/publichealth/2017/05/29/mark-zuckerberg-supports-universal-basic-income/
It will of course do the opposite,this plan as it ruins initiative to do much more than play video games in the basement. He knows what this plan and other plans like it will result in. This is why he is building his own life as far away from the masses as is possible in isolated areas of Hawaii with giant walls around them. Maybe Zuckerberg should offer universal basic armored redoubts like the ones he is accustomed to living in? Ultimately, he knows the score, and is protecting himself from the false utopian world he is trying to sell to you.

I hope I am not alone in being able to see past the flowery promises by simply using my own senses, logic and personal awareness. I remember when a speech at Harvard was thought to be an intellectual endeavor, not some indoctrinational mind control. Zucker’s speech sounded like like it was aimed at little children in safe little spaces. Indeed it was, the very children he seeks to control. I guess this is all we have at schools of ‘higher learning’ these days, no thought, no discussion, no debate, just the programming of the helpless, thoughtless audience, faculty included.

MOTOWNGOLD!