RE: Open Letter to @GrumpyCat
Sick burn! Also - way to downvote my comment that @firedream upvoted to somehow prove your point that grumpycat shouldnt flag people that are using bots to self upvote.
So your solution - let me get this straight - is for me to delegate my SP to some as yet unnamed person who will then flag people who use bots? Why would I do that as 1- I am a minnow, 2- grumpy is already doing it.
Your argument: whales are not the solution, delegate your SP to a whale, it's up to curators, whales are not curators... and I am the one being contradictory?
And again I asked you to suggest a solution to how we will fix this in the future if we let the bots destroy everything , and your response: @grumpycat is the bad guy!
Great thoughtful structured argument! Actually, you convinced me - as you said - let's let the bots destroy the reward pool, and if anyone acts against it, then the system isn't worth fixing!
I'm sold.
No. That is not what I said. I said to give SP to someone you trust as is suggested by the delegation instructions. Someone that will vote the way you want them to vote (like a voting bot LOL. I guess that's a whale. You can always trust it to vote the way you want though.)
https://steemit.com/steem/@blocktrades/voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change
Build your own whale, but no, it's not contradictory. It's what I've been saying since the beginning, you just have bad reading comprehension.
WE ARE THE ANSWER
There. It's huge and bold. Not sure if that helps. Maybe.
After this, I'm muting you.
Sorry for not answering this, but unlike @grumpycat, I use downvotes appropriately. I simply adjusted your payout what I believed it was worth. Unlike @grumpycat, I didn't do it because I thought downvoting you might aid me in getting electricity to Puerto Rico.
How a Downvote Should be Used