I didn't insult anyone. I only said that physicists are mostly not discussing that at all. This is a fact. You can check the programs of the key conferences and workshops on particle physics. His theories are not even mentioned. If this is not a legitimate answer, please tell me what it is...

His theories are quite compelling and I have not seen any credible scientific rebuttal on them to date

His theories have not been peer-reviewed, that is already one thing. Either he has tried to have them published in renowned journals and failed (that is a bad sign), or he didn't even try (that is a bad sign too).

From what I have heard (from people I trust), his proofs are not proofs. The "proofs" (with quotes) are circular. In other words, they are no proofs at all, and without foundation. This is not what science is (i.e. the scientific method is).

As for other physicists, check out Brian Cox or Elizabeth Rauscher.

Check them for what. This is not the topic...