Sort:  

It's not "the same." Female genital mutilation is objectively far more harmful.

I am shocked to see that people actually believe that cutting body parts off a girl is worse than it is for a boy. You would not believe how many babies die in the US every year from their lungs exploding during circumcision and I am not claiming that it's worse or better, because amputating either child is a barbaric practice.

Most def not the same - female genital mutilation is designed to remove a woman's ability to experience pleasure during sex!

Yeah sorry, it's not exactly the same in what is done, and it's not the same in all female "cutting" or mutilations cases either. Sometimes it's the skin that covers, just like in a man, and in a man it also removes pleasure from sex due to lack of sensation. It's not to the same degree again. So sorry for not being precise enough with my words. Genital mutilation is being masqueraded through social and cultural conventions everywhere, and in some places it is indeed worse as is the case with this post.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 58095.37
ETH 2464.09
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.32