Human Nature = Nature of Work
Human nature is never fixed. It is very much a product of thought. Personally, I believe that it can be designed as well. Unlike material technologies, social technologies are far more persistent in influencing individuals and nations. iPhones may one day disappear just like rotary dial phones, but ideas? Ideas can live on forever.
Is Adam Smith's idea of human nature just a belief or is it grounded in reality? Unpopular opinion, but I'm actually a non-believer and know that things can be entirely different. We are the "unfinished animals", afterall. Different platforms / set-of-tools will inspire different kinds of human behaviour.
If you think the world rewards selfishness far too much, what about designing something that rewards selflessness? To add to the discussion, here's a great talk by Barry Schwartz on "The Way We Think about Work Is Broken".
Work, money, society.
Today, you can choose which money you want to build which society you want.
The world does not reward selfishness, the selfishness rewards the selfish ;) However, it might seems that the world roots for the selfish because they, being very narrow target of reward, they seem to be getting more than the selfless, whose reward is shared between... whomever they want. Reward is redistributed. Like by a good charity. How about designing something where redistribution (flow) is the reward?
Sounds good, any examples of such an activity? I think u might mean distribution instead (not re-distribution)
Distribution, yep, that's more what I meant. Examples going towards "new designs", which might not be new, but they are rather scarce comparing to the usual model of "owner/shareholders get most of the profit" would be cooperatives, where people get and work together and distribute profits equally. Or reasonably proportionally at least, where "reasonably" means just that, not "owner gets $90, 9 workers get $1 each". Next step would be, for the profits, to go directly to... all. I'm going to write a post about it one day, it requires much more explanation, so it doesn't sound so communist ;) The main point being that all humans are shareholders of the sum of our endeavors.
Here is an idea-
I can live without work (as equated to reward) but I must have activity (as equated to purpose.)
Yup, maybe a better word for "work" would be "sustainable activities", since money is still a thing.
nice post brother
thank you :)
You are welcome :)
This post has been ranked within the top 25 most undervalued posts in the second half of Feb 07. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $11.89 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Feb 07 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.