Can cell phones really cause cancer? NIH researchers confirm link : Pittsburg
So here it is... the proof is here!!!
Come on regulatory boards... stand up and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!
Where are our non-thermal biological effects standard. Stop looking after industry and start looking after the people!!!
I just have to point out... there are a few editorial miss communications in the end part of this... but otherwise this is awesome!!!
5g sounds like it may be very bad for us to:(
Oh yes my word... the 5G system works on millimeter wave lengths, while it doesn't penetrate the body as deep as some of the others the damage it causes to the surfaces of our body will be great. Eye problems are expected to increase as well as skin cancers. A study was also done that found our hair shafts (all hair) work as antennas taking the RF deeper down into our tissue - which for 5G can't be a good thing. Keep in mind though that the 3G and 4G networks are still operational, so this will be something else again on top of what is already happening.
Thanks i did not know about the hair working as antennas like that.
Yeah, that was discovered by accident though a different experiment. I'd have to hunt that down, we will have it on file somewhere here. A lot more research would need to be done obviously but that's a scary thought. A lecture held on the risks of 5G and they got the discovers in to talk and explain their findings as it will greatly impact all of us on the 5G network. It was really interesting...
Yes i have heard 5g will be very bad.
Here's is the video... sweat ducts rather...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=15&v=VuVtGldYXK4
Cheers thanks.
Great post.
Your information matches my research results.
No amount of media coverage is going to change the storm that this is stirring up in the human body, and all life forms. Despite media coverage, look at how we REFUSED to get rid of cars operating on gasoline.
My hunch is that some sadistic minds are enjoying and making lots of money from the mutations created by this technology.
Before becoming chronically ill, I worked for an environmental corporation. I have to be careful about the information I provide, but do know that we have been "too late" for years now. But we can find ways to combat the issues that arise.
The outcome isn't necessarily bleak, it's offering a shift in the collective human consciousness.
My husband does a lot of research into the subject. He's attended lectures from visiting scientists from around the world, he's made communications with many Dr's, professors and scientists from around the globe who are working in this field whom he has also received copies of their research papers. He was also recently contact and asked to join a board for an organisation who works to challenge our governing bodies. So he is a little bit in the know : ) I should be a little bit careful too ; )
No you are right... the subject gets very little attention from mainstream media but it is slowly starting. As you said though... the longer it continues, the more damage is done to society. I think a lot of society are so addicted that they just can think beyond their addictions. It's not until it is too late that anyone wants to make changes, but it is too late then, the damage is done! So many also have superman thinking - it will never happen to them. While it is damaging to all of us... it is today's children who worries me the most.
There is a lot of money to be made in the telecommunication industry and when you start to delve into it all, it is all so corrupt. Like the safety standards that are bases on 20 year old information, technology 20 years ago was very different to technology of today - and the way we use it. The standards are also only based on thermal heating, no consideration has been taken into the non-thermal biological damage that has been found with double strand DNA breaks.
It just goes on and on and on.
People are starting to get sick though. The question is how sick will everyone have to get before something changes? I hope not too long but I fear it may be another 10-20 years. I too have become ill with a number of health issues, one is that I have developed EHS which isn't recognised here in my county yet. : (
EHS is a very real illness. If the medical industry were to officially recognize it, they'd have to recognize other environmental illnesses that cripple so many citizens.
You mentioned a 10-20 year timeframe, let's think of a few worldwide precursors that must happen in order to kickstart this process. I know we're only guessing, but it's worth a shot.
Here's one of my thoughts:
Currently, World War 3 is a cultural, religious, ethnic, and genocidal war that is bringing attention to the fact that the global majority of citizens don't want to invest their blood, sweat, and tears and lives into this fiasco.
Due to the internet and social networking, this shift in global consciousness is novel, and it could set into motion the global temperament that can foster collective bans and divestment of these products that are mutating (in ways that most citizens disprove of) the entire planet.
Citizens with ideas and patents for revolutionary resources would build an economy that bolsters a high number and quality of industry and jobs suited to physical and mental wellness within all regions of the world; making our differences our strength by giving us a wide number of diverse discoveries in diverse areas.
Some countries do already recognise EHS as a debilitating medical condition, I can only hope with time more awareness is seen in the medical industry. The problem with EHS is that it is variable... and science doesn't support variable. Symptoms from one can be different from another. What one may feel quickly it could take time for another... and so it goes on. Collectively though there are a lot of similarities and I don't believe this is something that can be dismissed just because it is variable.
I say 10-20 years because if I use the tobacco industry as an example... we once saw Dr's pushing cigarettes for ones health, that took 40 years to turn around and look at it now. Also if you look at the studies... lets use mobile phone users as an example... they say after 10 years of heavy use you're at a greater risk or developing cancer. If you look back through the files it is people who were in professions that required them to be on the phone a lot eg. Real Estate Agents, that started developing tumors before "regular society" but with the way people are using these devices today, that puts just about everyone at risk. Taking into account that it takes time for the damage to be done, we are only going to see an increase in cancer rates. Now we are putting RF emitting devices into every school room, every hospital room, every business and our homes... the results are going to be frightening if we continue on this path.
New standards need to be made including non-thermal... we need to protect our children since they are 10 times more vulnerable than we are for the simple fact that their brains are still developing, their skulls and skin tissue is a lot thinner than ours meaning the low levels of radiation penetrates deeper into their heads putting them at even more risk. The current standards were set off a group of army personal (men). The men were approx 90kgs, with big heads and thick skulls, it was one of these men who a dummy head was made for testing. If you look at the dummy head they do the testing on, it is huge, 90% of the population wouldn't have a head this size... yet out children are being compared to this size head. It's crazy and it's wrong!
If the science can't get our governing bodies to make the changes that are needed... everyone is going to have to get sick first. Cancer is already on the rise (as much as people try and mess with the data to make it look like it's not), it is and how bad is it going to have to get before someone starts listening to the science and acting on it?
We're all just being used as guinea pigs in someone's brilliant money making scheme.
@jayclar30 yet again, your research matches mine! So few people know about these recent results.
My mom had breast cancer, her sister had it twice, and their brother died a year ago from cancer. Because of this, we had BRAC testing and due to the results, I now see a breast specialist twice a year, that's in addition to seeing my gynecologist.
My dad's two sisters died from very aggressive cancers, neither reached the age of 50. And my uncle died from very quick and aggressive pancreatic cancer.
I appreciate all the recent research that the medical field has put into the RF issues in children. These results are sobering. We're left with a puzzle: how many minutes per day? One researcher humbly and honestly assessed that 10 minutes is enough. That blew my mind. My 12-year-old son and I have been going back and forth about console gaming, which we both enjoy. At the same time, he's homeschooled and is always outside soaking in the outside RF and UV. We live in the suburbs and have so many of the dangerous luxuries. The same researcher said that it takes until age 21 for boys' brains to fully develop.
You were saying that we'll have to get sick first. That made me think about the old plagues that destroyed a huge portion of humanity. So this is a "technological plague" of sorts?
And you know what, I bet "medicinal" cannabis and meditation via Virtual Reality is going to be the drug and treatment they use to treat this technological plague.
I'm so sorry to hear about all of your family! That is a lot, it's good that you're proactive. I lost my Dad at 56 and I thought he was young!
The standards are based on single one 6 minute call. I'm trying to remember what is classed as as heavy user, I'd need to look it up, but yes it wasn't very much. My husband is saying it also accumulative hours too... once you reach around the 1400-1600 hours your risk doubles to triples. if we're living in it 24/7, that is going to add up quickly.
Ah yes... game consoles. Which one do you have? Do you have a meter at all to take RF readings? We have an XBOX, my kids don't play it anymore, hardly ever. I think the last time was maybe a couple of months ago and they will only play it for a short time and they put a shield up in front of it to reduce the RF. The time before that I think was over 6 months ago. : )
Here is what I can tell you about the XBOX... the readings that out of that machine is off the charts!! We can walk 2 rooms away from where it is and the readings are STILL REALLY high. This is the part that shocked us though... even when it isn't turned on and working it is still pushing out those high readings of RF. We had to physically unplug it from the wall to get it to stop. So there is something to consider and maybe a change you might like to make. Unplug it always after use!!
I have read that children's brains aren't fully developed until they are 25... if you're not familiar with Devra Davis, check her out, she's really good and heavily concentrating on children.
Yes about the plague... of sorts it is. Did you know that Russia was radiating the US embassy without them knowing for years... there's a list that you can find of all the health problems and cancers that the US were suffering/suffered from. And then going back to war times... they often used RF control people/crowds. At stronger strengths of course as they, the recipients would start hurting straight away. Check out Barry Trowler, he's the best source of information on this.
Cannabis wise... maybe but of course at a huge cost! Monsanto are getting their fingers into this trade... they'll ruin it of course!