Hundreds of thousands of disillusioned people are scared of Trump as president and are "protesting him in advance".  How silly.

So let's look at our demographic of people who are protesting Trump.

A survey was done*, and 100% of anti-trump protesters have a TV, or have seen TV in the last year.

The anti-trump protest survey also reports the following:

Of the 100% Trump protestors who have watched TV in the last year, 100% of them heard a mainstream news broadcast mentioning something that Trump could do, or might do, but has yet to be proven to be a fact.

Of the 100% Trump protestors, they admit they are scared and worried of what things Trump may do as president, and even before he gets a chance to do anything that could be wrong, it's better to protest him now!  (If you wait until protest him later, then he has less chance of inauguration they say).

Protests is what decides who the U.S. President is..  ..right?  The election system is not legally binding, right? Trump protestors actually might think so...

Here's another startling part of the survey:

When asked: "In the 2002 Movie Minority Report a specialized police department arrests pre-crime criminals who have not yet committed crimes, but might in the future...  do you agree that we should persecute new presidents BEFORE they do something too?"

Unbelievably the survey reports, that YES!  Anti-trump protesters believe in pre-crime as a valid reason to arrest someone now, because they could create a crime later.

So the anti-trump protests we are seeing now must make sense in this case..

Protest your new president for things you are fearful he might do.  Here, Trump is guilty, because of what the mainstream media reports, and exaggerates, he might do in the future.

Ever say something you didn't mean?  Every say you were going to do something that you ended up not doing it?

Well that's Trump.  It's easy to say something at a podium during a campaign, and another thing to actually perform the act.  Protesters would be smart to wait to protest something that has happened, or is happening.

For example, if Trump doesn't start building the wall near Mexico, don't protest it, until he starts building it.

Instead, anti-protesters are protesting the future. 

They are protesting things that have NOT happened yet.

So instead of pre-crime, we have pre-protests.  

In 2017, we now protest the future.

In 2017, mainstream media continues to be out of control

In 2017, the public at large is quite illogical

In 2017, I can give you the anti-trump survey results and anger a lot of people by doing so.  But don't get mad at the messenger. This blogger is simply explaining the results of the survey.

* Survey details, disclaimer, and margin of error, etc follows below:

The result of the survey explained herein, was conducted about the upcoming 2017 inauguration of Donald Trump.  The results of the survey has a margin of error that may not coincide with the actual readers of this blog post.  Should you require more definitive figures for the survey, you may contact the conductors of the survey for further information even if they choose to remain anonymous.  This information has attempted to be provided to you, but comes with the disclaimer that the survey information may not be completely acurate. The margin of error is considered to be 100% out of 100% of all survey questions and answers given. The participants of the survey were limited to the opinion of a single survey participant. The legal ramifications of conducting surveys such of this is to illustrate that mainstream media can conduct their own surveys in a similar nature.  The headline that "the results of our survey" could mean that they're simply polling people in the news office and they never actually hit the streets to get the data.  Any type of pseudo-fact or pseudo-survey or similar report can contain a high margin of error.  However, as you can see, the truth can be distorted and still regurgitated by a large population of society to their family and friends without further investigation. It is for this regard that the survey indicated herein is a full illustration of the disinformation that is spread in the wild and is legal to do so when you include fine print that describes such survey.

QUESTIONS:

So what do you think of pre-protests?

Is protesting future events, before they happen, something we will continue to see?