Ganymede Hypothesis and Evolution

The basic idea of the Ganymede Hypothesis is not complicated and could be explained in one or two paragraphs...

The thing about the four bodies with the rough 26 degree axis tilts (Saturn, Neptune, Mars, Earth) says to assume they were captured as a group. The sun, Mercury, and Jupiter with axis tilts under ten degrees should be assumed to have been an original basic system. That says that our system was originally a dual system with a very bright part to the North and a very dark part (Earth, Mars) inside that Saturnian plasma sheath to the South. The old creatures of the Earth (Hominids, dinosaurs, lemurs, tarsiers, owls...) all had the same huge dark-world eyes; humans and dolphins with the smallest relative eye sizes of advanced creatures should be assumed to have originated within the bright Northern part of the system. Ganymede, for a number of reasons, would have amounted to an ideal home world for humans and dolphins at that time.

If I wanted to make two paragraphs out of it, I could mention the fact of humans being aquatic mammals (Elaine Morgan's aquatic ape thesis) despite there being no fossil evidence of any kind of an aquatic ape on earth and there never having been a body of water on earth which would be safe for humans to live in. Ganymede, it turns out, would have been a freshwater ocean world some tens of thousands of years ago with both anchored islands and floating bergs of pumice with luxuriant vegetation. The ultralow moment of inertia of Ganymede is due to a deep outer mantel of pumice and not salt water as is commonly claimed.

An original human world would need to be:
1 Bright (the relatively tiny human eyes)
2 Wet (the aquatic adaptations which Morgan mentions) and
3 Safe (both from sea monsters and from cosmic radiation)

Some tens of thousands of years ago, Ganymede had all that. The most major thing which protects us from cosmic radiation is an intrinsic magnetosphere; the two rocky bodies in the system which have that are Earth and Ganymede.

Some might ask how Neptune, Saturn, Mars, and Earth might have been captured by the sun as a group in such a way as to produce the same roughly 26-degree axis tilts. Basically, they were in an electromagnetic alignment (Herbig/Haro string); they flew into the plane of the sun's system from the South at roughly a 26 degree angle and as the individual bodies spun out and began to orbit as they do now, ordinary gyroscopic force caused them to retain the 26 degree approach angle in the form of axis tilts.

There is an interesting question as to what if anything the Ganymede hypothesis does for Chuck Darwin and the theory of evolution...

Consider that early on, our system was a dual system: a very bright northern system consisting of the sun, Jupiter and its moons (particularly Ganymede) and Mercury; and a very dark southern system including Neptune, Saturn, Mars, earth, and a few other bodies INSIDE the plasma heliosphere of Saturn, which was a dwarf or sub – dwarf star at that time.
Likewise there were two distinct living worlds: the living world of the Saturnian system consisting of creatures adapted to the purple Dawn environment with their huge eyes (hominids, dinosaurs, tarsiers, lemurs, owls, probably most monkeys); and then the creatures of the bright northern system with their relatively smallish eyes (humans and other aquatic mammals)...

Those two environments were separated as thoroughly as if they were 50 light years apart; there is no way to believe the one was descended from or in any other way derived from the other. And yet both were based on the same DNA/RNA information code and show the same basic design parameters for large animals (two eyes, two nostrils, two ears, teeth, four limbs, fur/feathers etc. etc.).

It should be fairly easy to see what that does to Chuck Darwin: what are the odds that to completely separated living worlds would ever develop in exactly the same manner, by random chance???

Cosmos in Collision completely wrecks any kind of an idea of humans being descended from hominids such as the Neanderthal. Hominids were advanced bipedal apes adapted to purple Dawn conditions. The Neanderthal is usually presented as a kind of a poster child for kum-bay-ah religion, i.e. just a slightly different version of a modern human. He was always viewed as a primitive human rather than as an advanced ape due to the size of his brain... Nonetheless, the Neanderthal brain was dominated by the area of the brain associated with vision and that combined with the huge Purple Dawn eyes tells us that the Neanderthal brain was largely the neurological equivalent of the circuitry for a military night vision device. Danny Vendramini's reconstructions give us a much better idea of what the Neanderthal actually looks like.

The idea of any kind of a hominid to human evolution simply does not pass a basic sniff tests for logic. For any hominid to have ever evolved into a human, that hominid would have to have lost everything he needed to live, thrive, and survive. Particularly, he would have to have lost:

1. His fur, while ice ages were in progress
2. Almost all of his night vision while trying to make it as a land prey animal (and surrounded by large predators which could all see perfectly well in the dark).
3. Almost all of his sense of smell while trying to make it as a land prey animal, which would have been instantly fatal.

An aquatic mammal, of course does not require much of a sense of smell.

The basic reality, as described in Cosmos in Collision, is that hominids were native to earth, while humans were native to Jupiter's moon system, particularly Ganymede.

Danny Vendramini's Neanderthal Reconstructions: