You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Should the United States Ban Guns?

in #life8 years ago (edited)

#1 get this guy on Steemit!

I'm of the "molon labe" crowd in America, so i realize my bias is to justify firearms ownership rights. i understand the case against disarming people, i just consider it a blunt force one-dimensional "solution" that ushers its own consequences:

-guns also save lives, permitting less capable to defend themselves against predators. Disarming those who care about the law is doing them a disservice.
-the video did a good job covering the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. Gun deaths MUST also include those inflicted on people by their own governments, and if you count the 20th century, Europe will be orders of magnitude ahead of the U.S. for centuries. The 2nd Amendment makes regimes like the Nazis, Spanish and Italian fascists, etc. much more unlikely to manifest in the U.S.
-Ending the Drug War would slash gun deaths by some massive %. Most gun violence in the U.S., at least, is caused by capital flows to gangs and subsequent gang violence. Banning guns doesn't even address this issue, just gives gangs an even greater asymmetric advantage over the rest of us. If there truly is a desire to cut gun violence, then first start with the low hanging fruit...end the Drug War and assess from there.
-Mass shootings have more to do with copycat psychology than guns. Deranged people will still try to mimic these events; certainly more difficult if they need to acquire weapons from the black market, but they will occur.

It's not always about stats, though, not that the stats even stack up in the anti-gun side of the argument. Just logically, it is counterproductive to disarm decent people who have never shown propensity to harm another. I'm one of these people. I've never considered harming another person in my life, and I regularly conceal carry my Glock. Disarming me and those who are similarly highly trained and responsible makes society less safe. Sure, disarming those with intent to murder would make society safer, but there are few better ways to screen than already exist with background checks.

Sort:  

I'm with you Brother! I'll be happy to turn over all my weapons just as soon as I run out of ammo...next year some time!

You only have a year's worth of ammo? Time to stock up while prices are coming down!

You have to be careful what you admit to online lol!

Great points mate and it should also be noted that banning people from having guns which we almost have here in the UK - you can get guns but it is very restricted, does not eliminate gun crime. The criminals can still get guns. That means that as a civilian you are at a double disadvantage. Even if you are a ninja you can't defend yourself against a criminal with a gun.

Also agree with you that governments like to ignore the deaths that they cause through war!

ha, yeah even ninjas are vulnerable to guns :)

Guns absolutely increase your ability to protect yourself, your family, and those around you. It's a tad immoral to deprive people of this right in hopes of simultaneously preventing extremely low frequency events. Not sure on the stats, but something like thousands of violent crimes are thwarted annually bc people have guns. Leaving these people vulnerable to predators is irresponsible, certainly doesn't make society as a whole safer.

Yes. Unfortunately we don't have the option here.

Sorry to hear that...hopefully you, and no one you care about, ever need one.

Thanks yes for sure.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 63793.25
ETH 3410.80
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.59