It started with 9/11 (part 3)

9/11 had been a traumatic experience for me, but even more traumatic was the realization that came piece by piece that the destruction of the WTC buildings and the attack on the Pentagon was not the work of a group of Islamic extremists headquartered in Afghanistan.
What shocked me most about this was the cover-up of these facts by not only the American, but by all western governments and even by the parliamentarian opposition and by practically all respected western media outlets.
Once you looked with open eyes at the evidence, the incompatibility of the official explanation with physical reality was quite clear for everyone to see, but those who were supposed to point this out just didn't.
For all my life I had trusted the media even more than the Bible, and now I realized that the mainstream media wasn’t trustworthy.
And it was this that drew the ground from beneath my feet and made my world turn upside down.
Some compare this process I went through with the experience of fictional Neo who woke up from the Matrix after taking the Red Pill.
But that’s not how it was for me.
Neo, who felt isolated before, woke up to a community of people like him. He felt slightly disoriented and sick to his stomach but not alone, no longer alone.
For me it rather was a tumble into Alice's Rabbit Hole. I was falling from a state where my mind was close to those around me into a hole where I was all alone, while the world was spinning in surreal absurdity.
Trusting no one any more I had to apply my own logic onto what often seemed beyond logic.
However trust is at least as important to one’s well-being as a roof over one’s head. If there is no trust left your mind is prone to paranoia. You look around yourself and you see enemies everywhere, real or imagined, it doesn’t matter, eventually madness will reign your every thought.
I realized I couldn’t live with that, I had to find a new ground on which to stand, a new trust, a new hold.
And confessing what this hold actually is on a technical site like steemit and in the English to boot, will probably make me as unpopular as it gets, for I found this trustworthy place in my faith and in within the Catholic Church.
This became my ledge, the secure ground from where I can still watch the spinning world, but I have stopped spinning with it. I have made a conscious decision to not doubt this ledge, this ground under my feet.
How is it that possible so many of you would say, how can any reasonable person still trust the Catholic Church with all its scandals?
And if you'd ask me persoanlly I'd say, I looked at the foundation and the foundation is good, the ultimate good, God.
I’d say as Catholics we are a Church of sinners, the saints are in heaven.
Scandals have been part of the Church’s history since the man who on Pentecost became the first Pope had a few weeks earlier, on the night to Good Friday, denied the very Christ who had called him to be the rock on which He would build his Church, had denied Him three times.
Sure some sins are a lot worse than others, and still those sins are aberrations, they do not define the Church.
The Church is the Body of Christ, composed of all its members, not only the clergy, but including the clergy.
I’m not blind to the Church’s past or present scandals, but I have read the Encyclica and the other documents coming out of the Vatican, and my own logic and conscience has told me that those writings describe a good foundation for the respect of the human person, for social justice and for peace. Through these documents I can see a loving God working in the minds of men.
Some say, the Church is “in it” on all the evils of financial or corporate capitalism and “in it” with the power-elites of the western world, she is itself a multi-billion dollar corporation.
I’d say, the money the Church has at the moment are mostly donations by not very rich ordinary people. And this money is just barely enough to keep up buildings and pay the salary of employees and to be used in those thousands and thousands of charities helping millions upon millions of poor people.
The Church's charities do not only provide food for the hungry but also for instance shovels and machines to build wells for watering crops, so the hungry can grow their own food.
The ideas of solidarity and subsidiarity, the Church documents talk about, are implemented in many practical ways throughout the Church's many organizations. And they are a step into the direction of a decentralization of power. Both these concepts are part of Charity in action and show respect for the human person.
What gives me the greatest confidence, that the Catholic Church, including the leadership in the Vatican, is not “in it”, is the fact that she does not budge on the doctrines surrounding sexuality, doctrines which make the Church so misunderstood and even hated by the outside world.
If the Catholic Church leadership was “in it”, they would have given in on the birth control issue at least, if not on the abortion and homosexual issues as well, as the liberal protestant churches have done.
The Malthusian ideology of a human over-population threat has become a pseudo-religious doctrine that is no longer being questioned, both for the media as well as for academia. And for decades now it has come to the point, that even many Catholics do not understand why the Church opposes artificial birth control.
The fact however is, that the Church does allow for family planning, but a natural form of it (NPT), in a method that is as effective as hormonal pills and more effective than condoms. It is based on the woman’s awareness of her own body and it’s signs. The method demands more communication between husband and wife. And those who practice the method often testify that their relationship and love has deepened because of this need for communication and closer physical knowledge and involvement with one another.
The method takes a little bit more effort than popping pills, but not much. It is a lot cheaper than the artificial methods, and it can be learned by all women, literate and illiterate ones as well. And since this method is not build on an artificial hormone confusion in the female body it has no side-effects that would go with that. These side-effects include besides other health issues a higher risk for a later infertility of the woman and contamination of water resources by female hormones which might lead to male infertility.
The Church also opposes “in vitro fertilization” methods and what these methods eventually will lead to namely the cloning of human beings and/or human genetic manipulations, the stepping stones to transhumanism.
It would have been so easy for the Church to give in on the pressure by everybody else, but she didn't.
And with this the Catholic Church is the only major institution in the world that consistently opposes Malthusian and Eugenics ideologies, the only organization that consistently defends the right to life and dignity of the human person and the genetic integrity of the human race.
While the nourishment I can find within the Church is in most parts spiritual (or psychological, if you want to see it in secular terms,) my firm decision to find this nourishment in the Catholic Church and in no other denomination or religion is based on the above facts and my secular logic and knowledge.
And so I confess I'm a Catholic 9/11 skeptic, as well as a skeptic to a lot of other things the mainstream tries to sell to me so hard every single day and now I'm a steemian
The catholic church are mega rich, through assets and ill-gotten gains. They have invested in pharamaceutical companies that manufacture birth control pills, and with weapon manufacturers, and with pornography and gambling, and made $$$ from nazi gold during WW2.
It wasn't until 2011 that the Catholic church introduced legislation to no longer fund terrorists or money laundering. They have a long history of financial crime, with many being still very recent.
I personally can never trust an institution such as the Catholic church. They look at the world in the long term, over courses of hundreds of years. With the paedophilia scandals in Ireland for example, they would not involve the law, and instead just moved the pederast priests to another part of Ireland, and they blamed the victims. Covering things up like this works well for them, because when it all came out, a lot of it was dated, and in a 100/200 years will not be remembered so much.
My main qualms though, are that there is nothing in the bible about a popeking mafioso system. It doesn't make sense how the pope speaks for God, yet can contradict and go against previous popes.
For a long time the finances of the Church, like the Vatican bank, had been in the hand of non-Catholics or pretend-Catholics, that is Free Masons.
The financial scandals of the Church had a lot to do with this fact.
Both this and the pedophile scandal saddens me. It's true the Church had tried to use its own system, send the offenders into therapy or into monasteries and allowed those who pretended to be "healed" to go back to work as priests.
They don't do this any more the Church has now a zero-tolerance policy regarding sexual abuse.
You don't have to trust the Catholic Church, but I do, because I have seen far more good than bad inside the Church and far too much evil outside it in the secular world or among the certain esoteric sects and lodges.
The Church teaches about respect for human life and dignity, while seculars consider human beings as worthless animals and esoterics believe human value depends on the level of their enlightenment and most humans have no value at all.
My choice stays with the organization that proclaims that every human being is of highest value, even though some among the clergy and the ordinary church members do not act accordingly.
And the Pope is neither a Mafiosi nor a king, but that's just my opinion, and I'm just an uneducated church member, someone like you will call me stupid.
This is the no true scotsman fallacy. And even if the pretend-catholic claim holds up (despite many of these people having been high level people within the church), the histroy is still steeped in getting rich people to pay their way into heaven, and burning anyone who disagrees with their teachings.
"Despite the "zero tolerance" stance on sexual abuse, Fittipaldi says around 1,200 plausible complaints of such incidents from all over the world have been brought to the Vatican in Pope Francis' first three years. Of the 20 such cases in Italy last year, some of the accused priests have reportedly been convicted of abuse and yet the church has not implemented any disciplinary action against them."
"One such case is Australian Cardinal George Pell, who has been accused of protecting serial abusers under his jurisdiction decades ago. Pope Francis was the one who appointed him to reform church finances, and he has stayed in his position despite the allegations against him."
"Another priest featured in "Lussuria" is Mauro Inzoli, who was convicted of molesting kids in 2012 by the church body investigating sexual abuses, and a judge even slammed the Holy See for not surrendering evidence in the case. Pope Benedict defrocked him that time, but his punishment became lighter under Pope Francis' term, and he was eventually able to return to his ministry under limited conditions."
This is just an opinion not based on fact. A counterclaim to the church having respect and dignity for human life could be made towards their treatment of church pederast victims (including past and present), or towards their contempt for human life in regards to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases which could have easily been prevented if they weren't peddling the anti-condom bandwagon for so long. The catholic church shows respect and dignity for money. They have enough wealth to tackle world poverty, but instead only give charity, because they are kind enough to give charity, but not rights to human beings.
I'm sure there are some seculars and some esoterics who might think the way you think they do, but I doublt that applies to the majority of them.
I don't think people are stupid. The world is very complex and beyond us, and we fill in the blanks without having all the facts, and create our own worldviews which don't represent reality.
Why not ditch the organisation? The teachings of Jesus are perfect. You don't need a God's mouth on earth pope character or a religious institution that tries to service both God and the money god to follow Jesus.
Anyway the catholic church has turned many people away from religion and God with its wily behaviour. For me that is unforgiveable.
"A counterclaim to the church having respect and dignity for human life could be made towards their treatment of church pederast victims (including past and present), or towards their contempt for human life in regards to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases which could have easily been prevented if they weren't peddling the anti-condom bandwagon for so long."
The Church including the Pope and many other Church officials have apologized to the victims as well as paid a lot of money.
They have personally met with victims many times.
As for condoms, they actually don't prevent sexual transmitted deceases, statistically seen. In the Catholic Philippines HIV infections are far lower than in mainly Buddhist Thailand were condom use is promoted.
And then there is the fact that those people who engage in extra-marital sex which is considered a sin by the Church couldn't care less about Church rules regarding condoms.
The Cardinal you mentioned was convicted of covering up the abuse instead of reporting it to the worldly authorities, not of engaging in sexual abuse himself.
As for me not ditching the organization:
Why are you trying to convert me to your religion when I'm not trying to convert you to mine?
The way I see it that those interested in getting Catholics to leave the Church the most are those who are not well- intentioned toward humanity. They want to isolate us and then divide conquer us. They are Malthusians and Transhumanists who see the human race as their enemy and the Church as an obstacle toward their depopulation and dehumanization goal.
No, the teachings of Jesus are not perfect without the Church, which is all of us as spiritual Body of Christ. Jesus taught us to be united in spirit and He founded the Church, including calling Peter, the first Pope, the rock on which His Church would stand
I'm not trying to convert you, just curious about your beliefs which you have chosen to share.
"Epidemiologic studies that compare rates of HIV infection between condom users and nonusers who have HIV-infected sex partners demonstrate that consistent condom use is highly effective in preventing transmission of HIV. Similarly, epidemiologic studies have shown that condom use reduces the risk of many other STDs." - CDC
The Philippines is facing one of the fastest-growing epidemics of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the Asia-Pacific region. So even if you compare it to Thailand (a country built around sex tourism) it still is facing a problem due to barriers to condom use. Not to mention Africa which has been massively affected by barriers to condom use.
Many people in philipines for example do not have access to condoms due to church influenced government rules.
This is after the fact of their abhorrent treatment towards them when many of them originally came forward with claims.
I think you have a very "us versus them" mentality. I believe that people are just people. We all want to live by each other's happiness, but we get caught up in our own fears, and see people as being "other", influenced by ingroup outgroup mentality.
Jesus taught that we are all brothers and sisters. Despite being Jewish, he helped non-jews. So personally I feel his teachings go beyond being part of a division or an institution. But I respect your choice to be a follower of the catholic church despite their mired history soaked in the bloodshed of hundreds of millions of humans. I personally cannot get behind any corrupt institution, and believe that every corrupt institution should be destroyed and then rebuilt, and so forth until an incorruptible system is formed; but this is entirely idealistic and maybe not applicable to the real world.
I see more corruption outside than inside the Church and more hatred. But I don't want to destroy your belief system.
So let's just say we agree to disagree.
Thanks for sharing your views by the way 😊
you're welcome