life
People use better understanding to give names to everything, and share them according to different criteria. And how to identify them themselves? They also found many differences and closeness. Each character has its own character, based on which, the division into good and evil has occurred.
Good person is kind to everyone. He is witty and well behaved. Always try to help suffering, protect others. Meanwhile, the bad are always trying to make mud for others. Even if not.
These definitions are easy to understand, but these characters are only in children's tales. These descriptions are very simplified, and indeed it is a complicated thing. There is not, really, evil, but there is bitterness, spoiled, volatile, and incorrectly raised. There are no good-hearted goodies, but there are decent people and high morals.
Contradiction of character.
Bipolar creatures, there are many conflicting qualities. For example, a man with good external data, always well-groomed, polite and glowing, just a prince on a white horse. Dig deeper, and show that he is squeaking, arrogant, cowardly who will escape in the first sign of danger. Another, imagine, in a leather jacket with nails, bike and brush on his head. Rough and restless, always somewhere missing. But if a friend gets in trouble, he will come to the rescue, even at his own expense.
Perhaps it is possible to determine the choice of the closest environment, if everyone just tell the truth? Unfortunately, but this is not a magic cure. If people themselves only know when they lie, when they tell the truth. Now someone completely convinced of the feelings of light, the end of the search for the second half, after a few months already can not tolerate it. There is still an unintended lie when he lied, he did not understand why. In addition, the mistakes seem to be trying the common good, but in the end, you only do worse.
Selflessness within the rules.
Perhaps it would be better to divide them into atheists and Anawites? Misjudgment also, everything is not as it seems. These definitions also have differences. Almost everyone in the world is selfish, to some extent. There are very few atheists. This quality is usually manifested only in part, and then more ostensibly.
You'll see the person who casts the big money for charities, as a beneficiary. They still have a lot, they get one thanks to them, and only one of the long-range plans.
On the desk offers a chocolate bar, but himself secretly hoping to refuse. Why then share? Just do not want to know as greedy, and should show politeness.
I found a cell phone on the road, why not leave it to myself? He threw the old card, and no one would find it. No, you sort the list of names, and you give it to the owner of the house. Sounds like, you want to keep on yourself, parents can not explain the emergence of a new phone, even sticks of conscience.
If you find Etherost correct, then what? Of course
It's good to know a person who is always willing to help. Only he will probably help you not only you, but all that remains. The company will also be taken, until then, there is no preventive mechanism, and he is willing to sacrifice himself for the benefit of all.
So it turns out that you need to identify the person, not only through the procedures, but also by the character, the original design and a bunch of other things. One can not say good or bad work without looking at it from all sides. Everyone has his own, that's right, that's why it's up to him to decide what's wrong, but what's good, he has to make himself.