RE: Was The Moon Landing Fake? Of Course It Was.
If the reason you had to get to the moon first was to get to the ruins first, would you show footage of it?
If you knew what the earth and moon really were, and your entire mission was occulting, would you show any real footage?
Things like, you can't see stars in space. If shown to be true, what does that do to every science book?
NASA constantly hides things. They have never, not once that I am aware of, given straight feed from any of their space ships or satellites.
Many say this is because of UFOs that visit them all the time. (or fly by) And others, its because of what is really there: Richard Hoagland https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1360067.Dark_Mission
Many many NASA photos are known to be fake. NASA is known to reuse old photos as new photos. NASA is known to lose photos. NASA is known to deny that they created a photo, when many say they did.
NASA a group that does such secret work, that they had to be a public company so that they are never under the freedom of information act.
Of course the moon landings were faked. I love how the trolls roll out "ruins" and "flat earth" everytime someone has his head straight enough to question the moon landings.
I just love how simpletons finally see enough evidence to say the moon landing footage was hoaxed, and then can't believe anything deeper or stranger happened. I love it because once the door is opened a little, they get more and more evidence. And soon, they will be like me, knowing everything I was taught in school is wrong. Everything! All of it.