The philosopher of the era of patristics say so

"
he philosopher of the era of patristics say so had in mind the philosophy of antiquity of the Middle Ages, the philosophers assumed that the philosophy of antiquity is the servant of modern theology of theology about modern theology habek philosophy our Soviet times their thoughts were repeated in a different way. So that theology was trampling philosophy. It did not drag theology and theology there is a piece quite complex and the philosophy is very organically involved in it in the reason it really is for the Middle Ages a synonym for almost theology. But then to where the epoch of modernity begins The new time is conventionally read from the Renaissance and up until the 20th century the philosophy of pants was considered a science and even such a definition was given to the Soviet science in the general framework of Soviet philosophy, the only scientific sounded so philosophy is the general laws of the nature of society and cognition and then begins already within the framework of Soviet philosophy some disagreements expressing the fact that this definition is also not complete and also enough Kursk philosophy the science of the most general laws the nature of society and cognition and thinking the science of the general laws of the nature of society and thinking And how thinking relates to knowledge and why only these three spheres A can we say that philosophy is the science of the most general laws of culture that are not nature and can not be reduced only to society only to thinking only knowledge is a special education according to the laws of which we now live with you also a limited representation of the foreign in fact no philosopher in general is concerned with the question What is philosophy tions at all but every philosopher knows mean well knows what his own philosophy and that's