Homeopathy is the scam - and here is why

Short answer - because I can wash my dishes...

My scientific work started in 2010, with the fluorescence spectroscopy. I continued to use EPR spectroscopy and FTIR. I also hang out with NMR/MRI and Raman spectroscopy people. And chromatography people as well.
If you don't trust me:
http://www.imsi.bg.ac.rs/cv_template/?id_zap=123

The basic idea of homeopathy is that the diluted water remembers the substance dissolved in it and somehow enhances the effect.

So, here is the challenge:

• take 20 bottles of whatever you want
• make different concentrations according to homeopathy principles
• mix the bottles
• measure the effect. Measure it however you like. Science doesn't have to understand it
• and simply show the right gradient of concentrations

Simply as that, and the homeopathy would be proven.

Here are the problems I have with the idea:

• distilled water is very, very dirty thing in comparison to a homeopathic solution.

  • How can you dilute something pure with something dirty?
    http://puretecwater.com/deionized-water/laboratory-water-quality-standards

• how can you dilute something beyond the limits of the single molecule?

  • If you start with a 1 mol of the substance, you will have 6 x 10E23. If you dilute the solution in the range of 10E23, you could end up with 1, or 2 or 253 molecules. How do you control this statistical unavoidable error

• bacterias are everywhere and those nasty creatures would easily spoil your solution once opened

• once you take the remedy, how it is not affected by saliva, stomach, intestine, blood, cell membrane...

Now the practical side, where the memory of water is contained?

• in some ions?
  • NO! It would be observable using pH meter, by measuring conductivity. Not there...

• In some energy of motion?
  • NO! It would affect the freezing point, melting point, vaporization point, could be measured by calorimeter and so on

• Ok! It is in a form of electrons in some energy levels...
  • NO! If would be observable as the phosphorescence or fluorescence, guess what, we could measure that as well

• Something similar, but not exactly that?

  • Like Raman? NO! Again, it is measurable
    

• In some vibrations, rotations?
  - NO! Measurable again, by vibrational spectroscopy, NIR, FTIR

• It is beyond the vibration it is some property of the electron.
  • NO! We have EPR spectroscopy.

• Ok! It is in the nucleus...
  • NO! We have NMR spectrometers.

In conclusion, if you can't measure something, you can't draw the conclusions.
It is simply a logical error.

If you have any questions or the ideas that were not covered in this post, please writte the comment and I will improve it.