RE: Omg look! A UFO! Quick! Let's grab the shittiest quality camera we have!
If UFOs, at least the ones who have visited us are real, why are the evidence always in shit quality?
First of all, of course UFOs exist. If you dont know whats flying around its a UFO. misread your post.
Secondly its not like people would usually have the time to go grab their camera. Their reaction would be to use their phone. Which is probably the shittiest camera they own.
If alien UFOs dont exist, why have their been wide spread reports and depictions of them since way before man was able to fly?
If ghosts are real, don't you think actual scientists and not reality-tv ghost hunter stars would actually do something about it?
Dont believe in ghosts, but this sounds like the no true scotsman fallacy.
If psychics who can see into the future real, why don't they just win the lottery in secret and stop with their walk-in readings?
Dont really believe in psychics, but maybe they do?
I think the camera quality in our phones today are a lot better than what we see today.
Can you explain no true scotsman fallacy? Sorry, I just googled it but I don't really get it. Why don't you believe in ghosts though?
Haha maybe psychics do .You heard of James Randi? Check out him:
Brilliant speaker and ex-magician who debunks psychics.
Thanks for commenting dude!
The camera quality in our phones is getting much better. But expecting to get a quality picture from the average persons phone of an object possibly miles in the air is a little unrealistic.
No true scotsman fallacy is like saying "anyone who is pro-life isnt a feminist". Basically you made the claim that people researching ghosts arent true scientists because some have a reality show.
I have heard of James Randi, have you heard of Annette Martin and other psychic detectives who have correctly predicted the locations of missing people?
I see. Thanks!
Nope I haven't heard of them. Let me go read up on them.
As for the fallacy, well, the point of my post is about going back to common sense. Yes, going deeper is important to find the truth, but I find that going too deep, and evading one's common sense is dangerous.
It sounds paradoxical, but yeah.
Isn't it a bad thing to overthink, overanlayze to the point you forgot why you started in the first place?
Common sense once told us that the world was flat, and man would never fly. Thanks to people who overthought, went to deep and evaded the "truth" we are were we are today.