Zero Archation PrinciplesteemCreated with Sketch.

in #libertarianism7 years ago

Image

With regard to the Theory of Relativity, Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity came first. It worked OK, but there was something missing that kept it from working "generally". So, in time, Einstein came up with the General Theory of Relativity which applied much more generally, since it included acceleration, which is a common variable in the real world.

In the same way, there is the Zero Aggression Principle: "No human being has the right, under ANY circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, nor to advocate or delegate its initiation." It works great, where aggression is involved.

But aggression isn't the only thing you don't have a right to commit. I have always said the ZAP is essential, but not sufficient.

Some people tried to get around this inconvenient observation by defining other acts as "aggression", but it was always an awkward fit.

Part of the problem was that there simply wasn't a word which covered all those acts which no one has a right to commit.

So I created one: archation.

Now, rather than only having a Special Theory Principle of Relativity Libertarianism, we can have a General Principle of ... whatever you want to call it.

The Zero Archation Principle.

"No human being has the right, under ANY circumstances, to archate, nor to advocate or delegate archation."

This new, general ZAP is shorter and more comprehensive than the "special" ZAP that laid the groundwork. Sure, you'll have to define "archation", but admit it-- you've always had to define "aggression" anyway.

I'm not ditching the Zero Aggression Principle. It still works for so many cases, and is at least somewhat familiar to those fellow travelers who read. But in my own head, I have already switched over to the new ZAP- the Zero Archation Principle. Feel free to join me if you want.

.

Thank you for helping support KentforLiberty.com.
Donations and subscriptions are always appreciated!

Sort:  

I'm interested in knowing what additional things you think people should be prohibited from that don't fall under "aggression."

Check that, I just read an explanation in another post.

I never said anything about prohibiting anything. I said "things you have no right to do".
I don't think anyone has the right to initiate force ("start it").
I don't think anyone has a right to take or destroy other people's property.
I think that's the whole list, unless you can think of something I'm missing.
And, if I am not talking about "prohibiting" those things, what do I mean? I mean if you do those things which you have no right to do, then your victim (or someone coming to their rescue) has a right to stop you-- with force if that's what it takes.

i just upvoted 2 of ur posts can u do the same for me too please :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 62094.36
ETH 2436.39
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50