You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Where has "pure libertarianism" worked?
Yet if you approve of democracy and argue that regardless of what democracy is, "reality" is different so "deal with it" or "play the game" you agree that democracy or Might is Right, Majority Rules, is ok, and, even if that's only a "majority that chose to play the game", you cannot abide by NAP, wouldn't you agree?
I don't approve of democracy. For the reasons you gave. If the majority wants to attack you, yes, in a democracy it might be ethical, but it breaks the NAP. The NAP should be the supreme rule, not the majority. So I do agree.
I am a capitalist, so I think people should rather vote with their money.